Opinion: As relations between Russia-Turkey get evermore friendly, should Armenia be concerned?

Turkey's decision to buy Russia's S-400 missile defence system opens a new stage in relations between the two countries. Dr Benyamin Poghosyan discusses the implications for Armenia.

Over the last two years Russia-Turkey relations have gone through tremendous transformations. Immediately after the November 2015 incident, when Turkish military jets shot down a Russian war plane, Russia imposed tough economic sanctions on Turkey and publicly accused President Erdogan of supporting terrorism, including "Islamic State". The situation dramatically changed in summer 2016 when Erdogan apologized for the November 2015 incident. The August 2016 meeting between President Putin and Erdogan paved the way for a rapid normalization of bilateral relations.

The changing priorities of Turkey's strategy in the Syrian conflict - with more emphasise on preventing PKK linked Syrian Kurdish groups from establishing an autonomous Kurdish region adjacent to the Turkish - Syrian border, and gradually abandoning its insistence on an immediate departure of President Assad - create additional good conditions for further Russia-Turkey rapprochement. In late 2016 Russia and Turkey, in cooperation with Iran, launched the Astana negotiation platform which resulted in agreements on ceasefire arrangements and the establishment of de-escalation zones.

Another factor which supports a Russia-Turkey rapprochement is the deterioration in US - Turkey relations. The decision of the Trump administration to supply arms to the Kurdish YPG in Syria, a group which Turkey deems as a terrorist organization, as well as disagreements regarding the extradition to Turkey of Pennsylvania based cleric Fethullah Gulen, who, according to the Turkish authorities, was the key organizer of July 2016 failed military coup, further complicated US-Turkish relations, making Ankara more prone to deepen its cooperation with Moscow.

The growing Turkey-EU disagreements, and especially the unprecedented tensions with Germany resulting in a public verbal onslaught by Erdogan against Germany's political leadership is another factor pulling Turkey closer to Moscow. Influential Western think tanks and prominent experts are publicly casting doubts on the prospects of US - Turkey and EU - Turkey relations, emphasizing that the Euro -Atlantic community should rethink its strategy towards Turkey, and while recognising Turkey's significant role in regional geopolitics, should find a new modus operandi with Ankara.

The latest harbinger of transformation in Turkey's foreign and defense policy was Ankara's decision to buy Russian made S-400 air and missile defense systems. The upgrade of air and missile defense systems is among Turkey's top defense policy priorities. In September 2013 China Precision Machinery Import and Export Corporation (CPMIEC) was selected by Turkey as the winner of a tender for the implementation of a long-range air and missile defense system project. Chinese company was competing with Russian S - 400 and US patriot systems. This decision raised concerns in the US and NATO regarding the compatibility of Chinese systems with NATO ones, and eventually led to the cancellation of 3.4 billion USD deal in November 2015.

But while the deal with the Chinese company was perceived with concerns in the US and NATO, Turkey's decision to buy S - 400 systems from Russia made the West nervous. Since the beginning of the Ukraine Crisis in 2014, Russia-US and Russia-NATO relations have reached their lowest point since the end of the cold war. Russia is accused of clear violations of international laws and its own commitments to international agreements, and of redrawing the borders of Europe by force. In response, the US put forward the European Reassurance Initiative, and NATO in its Wales and Warsaw summits decided to significantly raise its military posture in Eastern Europe. Moscow blames NATO for anti -Russian rhetoric, and accuses the Alliance of bringing its military infrastructure closer to Russia's borders. In such tense environment, NATO member Turkey's decision to buy the S -400 systems from Moscow will only further exacerbate Turkey's relations with the West.

In this geopolitical juncture Russia and Turkey continue their cooperation/competition in the South Caucasus. Here Turkey positions itself as the strategic ally of Azerbaijan, whilst Russia is the strategic ally of Armenia and hosts a Russian military base in Gyumri. Armenia is a member of the Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organization and Eurasian Economic Union. The Karabakh conflict, and the no-peace no-war situation between Armenia and Azerbaijan, put both Russia and Turkey in a delicate position, especially as Russia also has a growing partnership with Azerbaijan, supplying Baku with modern assault weaponry some of which was used during April 2016 escalation in Karabakh. Russia ‘s vague position during the April events, with no clear-cut support for Armenia, raised concerns in Yerevan regarding the efficacy of Russian security guarantees. In such an environment growing Russia -Turkey cooperation is perceived with some anxiety in Yerevan, with concerns about the possibility of an Azerbaijan - Turkey =-Russia trilateral cooperation format, and about Turkey's efforts to make changes in Russia's Karabakh policy.

However, it should be noted that the South Caucasus has more geostrategic importance for Russia than it has for Turkey. As part of the former Soviet Union the region is within Russia's self-declared zone of privileged interests, and Russia is putting extensive efforts to prevent the growth there of influence of any other actor. For Turkey, the zone of vital interest is the Middle East, particularly Syria and Iraq, significantly more now given the scheduled independence referendum in Iraq's Kurdish Region. Turkey is less likely to jeopardise its partnership with Russia in Syria and Iraq by challenging Russian interests in the South Caucasus. The region, and especially its alliance with Azerbaijan, can be a bargaining chip for Turkey in its negotiations with Russia. Russia itself will not tolerate any Turkish efforts to counter its activities in the region. Thus, at least in the short - term, Russian - Turkish rapprochement will not have significant impact on the balance of power between Armenia and Azerbaijan, or on Russia's Karabakh policy.

Dr Benyamin Poghosyan, is the Executive Director of the Political Science Association of Armenia, and a regular contributor to commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular