Opinion: The recent Iran-China agreement has implications for the wider region

The recent signing of a strategic partnership with Iran shows that China is now a significant player in the geopolitics of the wider Middle East. This has implications for the South Caucasus and particularly Armenia, writes Benyamin Poghosyan in this op-ed.

The Middle East has been an arena of great power competition since medieval times. Ottomans were fighting Persians, and then the British Empire and France dominated the region. After the Second World War, the Middle East was among the many areas of US-Soviet Union rivalry, and later the US was the only "kingmaker" enjoying its "unipolar moment." In the last decade Russia returned to the Middle East, launching a military campaign in Syria, facilitating the trilateral Astana process with Iran and Turkey, and cultivating pragmatic relations with Israel.

Until very recently, another global player – China – perceived the Middle East only through an economic lens. China imported a significant quantity of oil from the region, and the UAE became the critical hub for Chinese exports to the region and beyond. However, the growing global influence of China and looming strategic competition with the US started to impact Chinese attitudes towards the region. Whilst the Middle East cannot compete with South East and East Asia to become the top priority for Chinese foreign policy, China has eventually started to look at the region through a geopolitical lens, seeking to increase its political clout there.

Iran was the obvious candidate for China to foment its influence. Iran is the main US adversary in the region and, like China, is a nation with an ancient civilisation, which China respects. Iran–US disagreements have multiple layers, and even if the Biden administration returns to the 2015 nuclear deal, tensions will remain for the foreseeable future. Iran has friendly relations with Russia, which is also a plus for the development of Iran-China relations. From the Iranian perspective, strategic relations with China may provide Iran with much-needed cash and technologies to continue its "resistance economy" policy and deter the US pressure. The harbinger of the new era for the China-Iran relations was President Xi's visit to Tehran in January 2016.

On that occasion the two countries signed 17 agreements on a range of issues and agreed to boost bilateral trade to 600 billion USD over the next decade. The key result of the visit was the preliminary agreement to sign a strategic partnership agreement with 400 billion USD investments for the next 25 years. Since then, bilateral discussions have been underway to finalise the deal. The US withdrawal from the Iranian nuclear deal, the US-China trade war, and the COVID-19 pandemic delayed the agreement's signature. Finally, on March 27, 2021, the two sides signed the deal during the visit of the Chinese foreign minister to Tehran. The agreement may usher a new era for the Middle East, bringing another great power into the regional equilibrium. The US, Israel, and the Gulf Arab monarchies will look cautiously at the development of Iran-China relations. However, except for the US, neither Israel nor the GCC members can prevent the development of China-Iran relations, or put pressure on China. They all have beneficial bilateral economic relations with China and are not interested in jeopardising partnership with the growing world giant.

In the wider Middle East, the developing strategic partnership between China and Iran may have significant implications for the South Caucasus and Armenia too. As a member of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Armenia enjoys an interim free trade regime with Iran, and negotiations continue with a view to signing a permanent free trade deal between the EAEU and Iran. Armenia is the only EAEU member state, which has a land border with Iran, via the Syunik region, and this creates possibilities to transform Armenia into a production hub for foreign companies, which are keen to have tariff-free exports to the 84 million-strong Iranian market. Since 2016 Russian President Putin has floated the idea of establishing the "Greater Eurasian Partnership," which may unite the EAEU, the Chinese Belt and Road initiative, and ASEAN. The EAEU and China signed an agreement on trade and economic cooperation in May 2018 as the first step towards establishing co-operation between EAEU and BRI.

Currently, Armenia is in an acute political and economic crisis due to the defeat in the 2020 Karabakh war. Armenia needs time to stabilise the domestic situation and to stop the economic decline. The flow of foreign direct investments and increase of exports will play a decisive role in Armenian efforts to boost its economy. In this context, the launch of the China-Iran strategic partnership, coupled with Russia-China and Russia-Iran friendly relations, may create additional opportunities for Armenia to become a part of a potential China-Russia-Armenia-Iran cooperation.

However, to do this, Armenia should not sit and wait until China, Iran, or Russia approach with suggestions. Yerevan needs to develop a strategy towards Iran and China, taking into account the recently signed strategic agreement between the two. Armenia should have a frank discussion with Iran concerning the latter attitude towards the growing role of Turkey in the South Caucasus, and what Armenia and Iran can jointly do in the face of an over-assertive Ankara. Armenia also needs to send clear messages to China underlying Armenia's friendly attitude towards Beijing. These steps may include purchasing some amount of China-made COVID-19 vaccines, starting negotiations to invite Chinese telecom companies to explore the possibility of launching a 5G network in Armenia, and an Armenian decision to cancel its membership in the International Religious Freedom Alliance, which is an irritant for Beijing.              

  

Source: This op-ed was prepared for commonspace.eu by Benyamin Poghosyan, Founder and Chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan. 
Photo:  The signing of the Iran-China Strategic Agreement in Tehran on 27 March 2021.

 

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia

Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia

In elections on both sides of the Atlantic, that are likely to have deep implications for their respective regions, one incumbent won, another lost. In Brazil, Latin America's biggest country, left-wing President Lula won a fourth term in office, defeating his right-wing challenger Flávio Bolsonaro. The 80-year-old, took just under 52% of the vote in a run-off on Sunday. Lula thanked cheering supporters in São Paulo and said he had defended Brazil's democracy. His opponent, Flavio Bolsonaro - who won the first round - says the result is "inexplicable" and called for it to be annulled. His father, ex-president Jair Bolsonaro, is currently serving a jail sentence under house arrest for plotting a coup after losing the last election. This election was bitterly fought - and it bucks a wider regional trend towards right-wing leaders. On the other side of the Atlantic, in Serbia, long-standing leader Aleksandar Vučić has admitted defeat to the student-led protest movement in snap parliamentary elections. "We still do not have final results... it is clear that we have lost these elections," the right-wing populist leader said as he conceded late on Sunday. Preliminary figures from Serbia's election commission indicated a record high turnout, which commentators had suggested would favour the student movement. Celebrations erupted after Vučić conceded. Vučić called the snap elections after two years of protests triggered by the collapse of a train station canopy in the city of Novi Sad, which killed 16 and was seen as emblematic of corruption and negligence. Both election results are going to have a deep impact on their respective regions.
Editor's choice
News
UN Security Council will discuss "Children and Armed Conflict" on Monday

UN Security Council will discuss "Children and Armed Conflict" on Monday

On Monday (26 October), the United Nations Security Council will hold an open briefing to mark the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the children and armed conflict mandate by the General Assembly. Greek Minister of Foreign Affairs Giorgos Gerapetritis is expected to chair the meeting, which is a signature event of Greece’s October Council presidency. The anticipated briefers are Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict Vanessa Frazier; UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell; the Special Envoy for Children Affected by Armed Conflict of the African Union (AU), Jainaba Jagne; and the Director of Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict, Bethany Ellis. Greece served as the chair of the Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict in 2025, but has yet to be reappointed this year due to the ongoing delays in the allocation of subsidiary body chairs. It has nonetheless continued to prioritise the agenda, including by promoting a resolution addressing the impact of digital technologies on the perpetration of violations and abuses against children, which was adopted unanimously on 19 October as resolution 2832 and was co-sponsored by 93 member states. (For more information, see our 18 October What’s in Blue story.) In addition to organising tomorrow’s signature event, Greece invited civil society briefers focusing on the protection of children to two Council meetings—on Yemen and Syria, on 9 and 12 October, respectively—and chaired a meeting of the Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict on 13 October. Greece has circulated a concept note ahead of tomorrow’s meeting, which says that the briefing aims to assess the progress achieved in the 30 years since the children and armed conflict agenda was established as well as the challenges it faces. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)