Opinion: Agreement with Iran on the nuclear file now looks increasingly unlikely

The election of Joe Biden as president in November 2020 raised hopes among the international community that the United States will restore the nuclear deal signed in 2015. Many architects of the deal returned to positions in the White House and State Department. The other signatories of the deal, including the three EU states, China and Russia, were ready to contribute to the restoration of the deal. Conventional wisdom said that Iran should be interested in restoring the deal, too. The economic downturn triggered by the re-imposition of the US sanctions created significant challenges for the Iranian government. Thus, as indirect talks started in Spring 2021, it seemed that all ingredients were there to reach an agreement even before the end of President Rouhani's second and final term in June 2021.

However, the restoration of the agreement proved to be much more difficult. As a response to the US withdrawal from the deal, Iran started to increase the level of uranium enrichment, while the US decision to include the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) on its “Foreign Terrorist Organizations” list in 2019 complicated the matters further. After the June 2021 Iranian Presidential elections, which ended with the victory of Ebrahim Raisi, Iranians asked for a break in the negotiations to allow the new administration to get a better understanding of the developments. Negotiations resumed in late November 2021 and seemed to reach a final stage in March 2022 when the sides almost agreed on the agreement's text. Even the war in Ukraine started on February 24, 2022, and Russia’s unexpected demand for written guarantees that its economic trade with Iran would be exempted from US sanctions imposed on Russia since its start of hostilities did not derail the negotiations.

Alas, since March 2022, negotiations entered into a stalemate, due allegedly to the Iranian demands to remove IRGC from the “Foreign Terrorist Organizations” list. Another issue of contention was Iran’s demand to provide guarantees that future American administrations will not withdraw from the agreement, repeating the President Trump move taken in May 2018. Meanwhile, the Republicans in the US House of Representatives and Senate pressured the Biden administration on Iran’s issue. On March 14, 2022, forty-nine Republican Senators signed a statement claiming they would not support the revived Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with Iran.

Israel also was taking steps to prevent the resumption of the nuclear deal. In late February 2022, Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett stated that the new nuclear accord between Iran and P5+1 states would be weaker than the original 2015 agreement. Israel ratcheted pressure against the US administration to keep the IRGC on the terrorist list. In late May 2022, President Biden finalized his decision to keep Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps on a terrorist backlist and conveyed his decision during a May 24 phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. On May 22, 2022, gunmen riding on motorcycles opened fire on a senior officer of IRGC outside his home, killing him in his car in the capital, Tehran. Iran blamed the assassination on “elements linked to the global arrogance” – its term for the United States and its allies, including Israel.

Tensions raised further as on June 8, 2022, International Atomic Energy Agency adopted a resolution criticizing the Islamic republic for failing to cooperate. The resolution – the first to criticize Iran since June 2020 – was approved by 30 members of the IAEA board of governors, with only Russia and China voting against it. House before the vote, Iran said it disconnected some International Atomic Energy Agency cameras monitoring its nuclear sites.

The EU made a last-minute effort to push forward the negotiations, as Josep Borrell, the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, met Hossein Amir-abdollahian, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Iran, on June 25, 2022, in Tehran. Iran and the United States launched another round of indirect talks in Qatar, mediated by the EU. However, the talks, which were held on June 29-30, did not bring any results. On July 1, 2022, a senior US official told Reuters on the condition of anonymity that chances of reviving the 2015 Iran nuclear deal were worse off after talks in Qatar.

The drama surrounding the potential restoration of Iran’s nuclear deal flows parallel with evolving Russia – West confrontation. As the West, led by the US, seeks to isolate Russia internationally, Kremlin attempts to deepen its relations with non-Western powers. Russia participated in the BRICS summit (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) held on June 23, 2022, followed by BRICS + summit on June 24 with the participation of leaders of Algeria, Argentina, Cambodia, Egypt, Ethiopia, Fiji, Indonesia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Senegal, Thailand, and Uzbekistan. On June 27, 2022, Iran and Argentina applied to join BRICS.

As Iran seeks to deepen its relations with the non-Western world as a part of the “Look to the East” foreign policy, Tehran hosted Russian foreign minister Lavrov in late June 2022. During negotiations with Iran’s President and Foreign Minister, Lavrov stated that for all countries experiencing the negative influence of the selfish line taken by the United States and its satellites, there is a need to reconfigure economic relations. In this context, the prospects for restoring Iran’s nuclear deal are becoming less and less tangible while Iran seeks to counter the US through activating its involvement in non-Western institutions.   

 

source: Benyamin Poghosyan is the founder and Chairman of the Centre for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan.
photo:  Talks in Vienna on restoring the Iran nuclear deal have been going on for months. (archive picture)
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Not quite there yet!

Not quite there yet!

The presidents of Ukraine and the United States were both upbeat after their talks on Sunday (28 December), but clearly there is yet no agreement on how to end the war in Ukraine. Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky said progress had been made during Florida talks but the US president admitted the problem of territory remained "unresolved". While both the US and Ukrainian presidents described the talks as "great", Trump said "one or two very thorny issues" remained outstanding - most notably on the issue of land. Addressing reporters at Mar-a-Lago, Zelensky said they had come to an agreement on "90%" of the 20-point peace plan, while Trump said a security guarantee for Ukraine was "close to 95%" done. Zelensky later said US and Ukrainian teams would meet next week for further talks on issues aimed at ending Russia's nearly four-year war in Ukraine. "We had a substantive conversation on all issues and highly value the progress that the Ukrainian and American teams have made over the past weeks," Zelensky said in a statement on the Telegram messaging app. Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, and Moscow currently controls about 20% of Ukrainian territory. A proposal to turn the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine, which Russia largely controls, into a demilitarised zone remains "unresolved", Trump said. "Some of that land has been taken," he told reporters after the meeting. "Some of that land is maybe up for grabs, but it may be taken over the next period of a number of months." Moscow currently controls about 75% of the Donetsk region, and some 99% of the neighbouring Luhansk. The regions are collectively known as Donbas. Russia wants Ukraine to pull back from the small part of the territory it still controls in Donbas, while Kyiv has insisted the area could become a free economic zone policed by Ukrainian forces. The US president has repeatedly changed his own position on Ukraine's lost territories, and in September stunned observers by suggesting that Ukraine might be able to take it back. He later reversed course. "[That] is a very tough issue," he said. "One that will get resolved." Security guarantees for Ukraine are "95% done", Trump said, without formally committing to logistical support or troop deployment to help protect Ukraine from future attacks. Trump floated the possibility of trilateral talks between the US, Russia, and Ukraine, saying it could happen "at the right time". Immediately after their bilateral talks, Trump and Zelensky held a one hour meeting with European leaders. European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, wrote on X "We had a good hour-long conversation with President Trump and Zelensky. Several European leaders were present and discussed future peace talks. Good progress has been made. Europe stands ready to work with its partners to consolidate this."  

Popular