Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
Opinion

Just Peace - "The Hague Speaks for Peace: Rebalancing Security”

5 July 2025

Last week, as NATO leaders gathered in Brussels for their summit, LINKS Europe joined other civil society organisations in a public statement. The Statement was the initiative of The Hague Humanity Hub.

The statement called for a balanced vision of peace and security, one that places people at its heart.

At a time when the focus is increasingly drawn toward defense capabilities and military preparedness, the statement urged equal and sustained attention to and investment in the long-term work of building resilient, inclusive, and just societies. This is not an alternative to security, it is the foundation of it, the statement added.

The Statement

As global leaders prepare to gather in The Hague for the 2025 NATO Summit, we call for a balanced vision of peace and security, one that places people at its heart.

At a time when the focus is increasingly drawn toward defense capabilities and military preparedness, we urge equal and sustained attention to and investment in the long-term work of building resilient, inclusive, and just societies. This is not an alternative to security. It is the foundation of it.

We cannot rely solely on military force to prevent and resolve conflicts. We also need policies that eliminate the social, economic and political roots of conflict. This means investing in resilience, in stable institutions, equitable economies, inclusive and just societies, and the rule of law. Today’s complex and compounding global problems: conflicts and geopolitical tensions, the climate crisis, deepening inequalities all call for a balanced approach. Our collective security and well-being everywhere—including here in the Netherlands—relies on it.

However, while military spending is increasing, investments in prevention of root causes of conflict are decreasing.

We need to act now. Here in the Hague, across the Netherlands and beyond, many individuals and institutions are working tirelessly to prevent conflict, protect human rights, uphold international law, and build the foundations of just and peaceful societies. These efforts are essential to global security and must be valued and resourced alongside defense.

We therefore call on political leaders, civil society, international institutions, and concerned citizens to:

  • Champion policies that recognize addressing root causes as a vital part of our approach to security alongside defense;

  • Ensure that the pursuit of peace remains a shared and resourced priority in both national and international agendas;

  • Increase investments in developing stable institutions, equitable economies, inclusive and just societies, and the rule of law;

  • Recognise and support the vital contributions of peacebuilding and humanitarian organisations and professionals in the Netherlands and worldwide;

As the Just Peace Festival reminds us, peace is not found in the absence of war— it is found in building resilient, inclusive and just societies as the pathway to sustainable peace. Let us not lose sight of that truth. And let us act on it.

We invite all individuals and institutions committed to a more just and peaceful world to endorse this statement and stand together in building a future where peace is not only protected, but cultivated.

 

This statement is an initiative of The Hague Humanity Hub

ENDORSENEDERLANDS

If you have any questions or would like to get in touch with us please drop a line to hello@humanityhub.net

Endorsed by:

Organisations

  • 1646, The Netherlands
  • Asia Justice Coalition*, The Netherlands
  • Asylos, UK/Netherlands
  • Climate Legal Consulting, The Netherlands
  • Civil Society Platform for Peacebuilding and Statebuilding (CSPPS), The Netherlands
  • Cordaid, The Netherlands
  • Commit Global, The Netherlands
  • CyberPeace Institute, Switzerland
  • Defend Democracy, The Netherlands
  • Didi, Israel
  • Find Out Why, The Netherlands
  • Foundation Max van der Stoel, The Netherlands
  • Free Thought, UK/The Netherlands
  • Gender Concerns International, The Netherlands
  • Global Human Rights Defence, The Netherlands
  • Global Shapers The Hague, The Netherlands
  • HiiL, The Netherlands
  • HVFC International, The Netherlands / USA
  • Integrity Initiatives International Europe, The Netherlands
  • International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, The Netherlands
  • International Human Rights Commission-RFT, The Netherlands
  • International Institute of Social Studies, The Netherlands
  • Leaders for Climate Action, The Netherlands
  • Leiden University, The Netherlands
  • LINKS Europe Foundation, The Netherlands
  • MasterPeace, The Netherlands
  • Netherlands Institute for Multiparty Democracy, The Netherlands
  • Oranjeconsult, The Netherlands
  • Partos, The Netherlands
  • PAX, The Netherlands
  • Rhubarb Effect, The Netherlands
  • Somaliland Lawyers Association (SOLLA), Somaliland
  • Stichting HALO Trust Europe, The Netherlands
  • Stichting Takecarebnb, The Netherlands
  • Stichting Vreedzaam, The Netherlands
  • The Global Pro Bono Bar Association, United States
  • The Hague Academy for Local Governance, The Netherlands
  • The Hague Humanity Hub, The Netherlands
  • The Impact Canopy, The Netherlands
  • Topaze, The Netherlands
  • United Network of Young Peacebuilders, The Netherlands
  • Werkplaats van de Woestijne, The Netherlands
  • Women in International Security Netherlands, The Netherlands
  • ZOA, The Netherlands

 

     

    Individuals

    • Alexander Gunkel, CEO, Space4Good, The Netherlands
    • Angelica Cibrian, Scientist, Naturalis, Netherlands/Mexico
    • Antonietta Elia, Professor of International Law / Senior Legal Adviser / Human Rights Activist, Spain
    • Ali Al Bayati, Founder and CEO, Stichting Defenders for Human Rights, The Netherlands
    • Anthony Forde, Academic / Human Rights / War Crimes Investigations Training, 4RDE Consulting, United Kingdom
    • Benjamin Duerr, International Lawyer and Writer, The Netherlands
    • Christophe Paulussen, Senior Researcher, T.M.C. Asser Instituut, The Netherlands
    • Christelle Menassa, Media Development Expert, The Netherlands
    • Clair Moore, Programme Manager, Centre of Expertise, Global and Inclusive Learning, The Netherlands
    • Claudia Arana, Finance and Operations Manager, The Netherlands
    • Daniel Shynn, Programme Officer, Justice & Peace Netherlands, The Netherlands
    • Daphne Nederhorst, Social Entrepreneur, Sustainability in Action, The Netherlands
    • Edward Meijer, Engineer, The Netherlands
    • Emmanuel Tombe John, Advocate of Peace leveraging traditional Media for outreach, South Sudan
    • Emmylou Aben, CEO, Pitztop, The Netherlands
    • Faatimah Clarke, Communications and Marketing Associate, The Netherlands
    • Gordon Graham, Rotary Club The Hague Metropolitan, Rotary International, The Netherlands
    • Guy van Eijkeren, Manager, Economic Board The Hague (EBTH), The Netherlands
    • Harry Hummel, Human Rights Campaigner, The Netherlands
    • Heleen Weening, Connector, builder, Witte Raaf Realisatie, The Netherlands
    • Ieva Cesnulaityte, Researcher of democratic innovation, Lithuania
    • Ilaria Blasi, Senior Communications & Marketing Associate, Italy
    • Ilse Valkering, Stakeholder Manager, The Netherlands
    • Inge Hutter, Professor of Participatory and Qualitative Research in Population and Development, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Irene Juffermans, International development / Human Rights, The Netherlands
    • Jan Aart Scholte, Professor, Leiden University, The Netherlands
    • Kalina Kalpakchieva, Intern, The Netherlands
    • Karla Espinoza, Fundraising Consultant, The Netherlands
    • Kasper Vrolijk, Managing Director, The Netherlands
    • Katarzyna Gardapkhadze, Senior Manager / Director of Global Programs, Poland
    • Krijn van Beek, Strategy Designer, Policy Design Studio, The Netherlands
    • Leila Prnjavorac, Moderator, public speaker, guest lecturer and peace ambassador of The Hague, The Netherlands and Bosnia and Herzegovina
    • Liane Lankreijer, Wisdom Keeper, Regenboogcirkel, The Netherlands
    • Liselotte de Koning, Lead, Red Cross Princess Margriet Fund, The Netherlands
    • Liv Toonen, Tech Project Lead, Space4Good, The Netherlands
    • Machiko Kanetake, Associate Professor of Public International Law, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
    • Maja Vodoopivec, Assistant Professor of Peace and Conflict Studies, Leiden University, The Netherlands
    • Maria Luisa Avila Jimenez, Innovation Consultant, Spain
    • Maral Khajeh, Programme Coordinator, Justice & Peace Netherlands, The Netherlands
    • Mary Kaburura, Advocate, Isaac Newton Advocates, Uganda
    • Melissa Tepper, Producent, The Netherlands
    • Michiel Hardon, Retired, The Netherlands
    • Mijanou Edink, Editor, The Netherlands
    • Nasya Handzhiyska-Westra, International Business Advisor, The Hague & Partners, The Netherlands
    • Paulien Boone, Consultant, The Netherlands
    • Piero Gandini, Sherpa for Changë, Disяuption, and Personal Transformation, The Netherlands
    • Pieter Wismans, Medical Professional PhD, The Netherlands
    • Prateek Shankar, Strategic Designer, Dark Matter Labs, India
    • Säde Aurora Aalto-Setälä, Communications and Marketing Analyst, The Netherlands
    • Sajad Sepehri, Educational Development and Innovation Strategist, Institute for Social Sciences & Humanities / VU, The Netherlands / Iran
    • Salah, Project Manager, The Netherlands
    • Sara Dzafic, Political Sociologist & Socioeconomic Researcher-Consultant, The Netherlands
    • Sarah Abdelatif, Founder, Propel, The Netherlands
    • Sidney Primm, Student, The Netherlands
    • Siobhan, Fundraiser, The Netherlands
    • Solange Hai, Case Writer, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    • Stefan Noël Hageman, Process Manager, MIRCURY, Netherlands
    • Stéphane Duguin, Chief Executive Officer, CyberPeace Institute, Switzerland
    • Tania Bernath, Self-employed, Gen X for Justice, USA
    • Thirza Pluimer, Corporate Communication Manager, The Netherlands
    • Tomas Kidd, Consultant, The Netherlands
    • Wim Nusselder, Financieel Administrateur, The Netherlands
    • Yvonne Versteeg, Mens, The Netherlands

     

         

        *This does not reflect the views or positions of all AJC members

         

        Latest

        Editor's choice
        Monday Commentary
        Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?
        Trending

        Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

        19 October 2026
        Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
        Dennis Sammut

        Popular

        Editor's choice
        Monday Commentary
        Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest
        Trending

        Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

        7 September 2026
        Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
        Dennis Sammut
        Editor's choice
        Monday Commentary
        Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”
        Trending

        Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

        21 September 2026
        There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)
        Dennis Sammut