What's the end game?

At what point will the lockdown end?  William Murray looks at the WHO Europe's policy guidelines to this question we are all asking, in this short piece for commonspace.eu

On the 23rd of January, the city of Wuhan, China - where the coronavirus emerged - was put into a lockdown, which lasted 76 days until the 8th of April. With most of us having now been living under some degree of lockdown for over a month, people are beginning to ask when preventative measures are likely to ease up elsewhere. World leaders now find themselves at a crossroads and must decide whether to sustain lockdown measures, limiting loss of life and taking the pressure off health services but with considerable economic cost; or to ease measures but risk an even bigger second wave of infection, potentially undoing what has been achieved by the measures in place.

To help countries to responsibly assess requirements for ongoing preventative measures, the World Health Organization (WHO) has published a set of key policy considerations for European states centring around the following six criteria. Countries considering easing up COVID-19 lockdown measures must ensure:

  1. that evidence shows COVID-19 transmission is controlled;
  2. that public health and health system capacities are in place to identify, isolate, test, trace contacts and quarantine them;
  3. that outbreak risks are minimized in high-vulnerability settings, particularly in homes for older people, mental health facilities and crowded places of residence;
  4. that workplace preventive measures are established, including physical distancing, handwashing facilities and respiratory etiquette;
  5. that importation risks can be managed; and
  6. that communities have a voice and are aware, engaged and participating in the transition.

Whilst the WHO emphasises that there is no 'one-size-fits-all' approach - and that even within Europe, there are vast differences in infection rates and healthcare service capacities - such criteria should be taken as guidelines. Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge, WHO Regional Director for Europe, has said: "This document aims to support countries by providing key considerations for the slow easing of restrictions and transitioning to a 'new normal'. While everyone wishes the return of economic activity, it's important to be clear that this will be a gradual process, requiring strict monitoring and a possible reintroduction of measures should there be a new increase in cases." [1]

The WHO has also recommended staggering the easing of restrictions as due to the nature of COVID-19, the knock-on effects of relaxing measures will not be completely clear until 10-15 after the lifting of restrictions. Additionally, countries must acknowledge that there may need to be a quick reintroduction of certain physical distancing measures if further outbreaks occur.

The full document of WHO policy considerations for European states is available to download here [2].

Source: William Murray, Project Officer and Coordinator at LINKS Europe, for commonspace.eu

Featured Sources:

[1] The WHO - 'WHO/Europe publishes considerations for gradual easing of COVID-19 measures': http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/4/whoeurope-publishes-considerations-for-gradual-easing-of-covid-19-measures

[2] The WHO - 'Strengthening and adjusting public health measures throughout the COVID-19 transition phases. Policy considerations for the WHO European Region, 24 April 2020': http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-technical-guidance/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-outbreak-technical-guidance-europe/strengthening-and-adjusting-public-health-measures-throughout-the-covid-19-transition-phases.-policy-considerations-for-the-who-european-region,-24-april-2020

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)