What happened to the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) natural gas pipeline?

The idea of the TAPI pipeline, designed to transport gas from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan and India, has been around for approximately 30 years. However, in practice, little progress has been made. Clashes between Pakistan and India in May this year and renewed fighting on the Pakistan–Afghanistan border have further slowed implementation (check out Monday Commentary: South Asian nations must avoid a catastrophe, on commonspace.eu for further information).

Despite this, Turkmenistan and Afghanistan recently held a ceremony on Monday (20 October) to inaugurate a small section of the pipeline between the Turkmen–Afghan border (Serhetabat) and the Afghan city of Herat. According to Afghan officials, about 14km of pipe have been laid, with 70km more planned. For now, the focus of the project appears to be on constructing the pipeline as far as Herat in Afghanistan.

There are a few challenges that the TAPI pipeline continues to face. Firstly, security inside Afghanistan remains a major issue, though security conditions have changed under the Taliban. The Taliban, through its imposition of brutal control, has reduced security concerns; however, the problem is far from over. Secondly, the tensions between India and Pakistan raise doubts about whether gas flows can pass through both countries reliably. While the project is designed to increase regional trust and stability, Central Asia analyst Bruce Pannier argues that the pipeline could just as easily become a manipulation tool. If, for example, there is renewed fighting between Pakistan and India or Pakistan and Afghanistan, there is a high chance that Pakistan may stop the gas flow into India or that Afghanistan may stop the gas flow into Pakistan. Thirdly, financing and infrastructure gaps remain large. The pipeline is planned for 33 billion cubic metres of gas per year, but Afghanistan’s infrastructure can handle only a fraction of this.

While the TAPI project is still officially active, its goals are now much smaller and slower than first planned. Turkmenistan and Afghanistan are moving forward with a limited version, but the dream of reaching Pakistan and India is still far away.

Source: commonspace.eu with the Times of Central Asia and other agencies

Related articles

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)