Tunisian government to be announced in the coming days

On Thursday (20 August), Tunisia's president, Saïed, finally said that the composition of the new government will be announced in the coming days, according to a video footage published by the Tunisian presidency on its official Facebook page. The president announced it during his meeting with the minister of social affairs, Mohamed Trabelsi, and the manager of the ministry of the economy, finance and investment support, Sihem Boughdiri Nemsia.

Almost four weeks after taking power temporarily, Saïed has yet to appoint a new head of government. On 25 July, Saïed cited Article 80 of the constitution to "freeze" the parliament's activities for 30 days and dismiss the prime minister, an act which was characterised by the dominant party Ennahda as a "coup against the constitution and the institutions" and scrutinised by the international community, as several actors feared the events could compromise the country's democracy.

In the video published on Facebook, the president attacked those who talked about a coup: "How can we talk about a coup d'Etat on the basis of the constitution, and Article 80?" he wondered, referring to a peril that threatened the state. "What is most important, the absence of the state or the absence of the government for a short time so that things get back to normal, as the Tunisian people want," he continued, reassuring about the continuity of the State and its public services.

Reacting to those who talk about roadmaps to get the country out of its multiple crises, Saïed pointed out "concepts that come to us from abroad, that some repeat without knowing the meaning", adding that "the only road I would take, with the same determination and the same constancy, is that traced by the people".

Ever since 25 July, it has been difficult to anticipate the president's actions. The Tunisian people and the world are only kept aware of the changes that occur in the government through brief statements, such as the most recent one issued on Tuesday (18 August), in which Saïed appointed Sami Al-Hichri as director-general of National Security and Shukri Riahi as commander of the National Guard.

Additionally, the president's tone has hardened since he took power, notably regarding his desire to eradicate corruption, an issue he insists on at almost every outing. In line with this stance, several MPs and businessmen were banned from travel recently as part of a major anti-corruption campaign. Moreover, when he congratulates medical and military personnel on the success of open vaccination campaigns, he sends a spade to politicians. "We must also vaccinate the country of political bacteria", in his words.

Whilst Saïed's strategy for the future remains unclear, the Tunisian president seems persistently confident about his actions, which he continues to take without consulting the dominant islamist party Ennahda. Although the latter called for national dialogue shortly after Saïed took power, the head of state declared on Monday (16 August) during a visit to Tunis-Carthage airport that he will not discuss with those who speak of a coup to qualify his seizure of power, adding that there will be no going back. 

 

source: commonspace.eu with TAP (Tunis), RFI (Issy-les-Moulineaux) and agencies.
photo: Kaïs Saïed during his meeting with the minister of social affairs, Mohamed Trabelsi, and the manager of the ministry of the economy, finance and investment support, Sihem Boughdiri Nemsia, in Tunis on Thursday, 19 August; Twitter account of the Tunisian presidency.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)