In Tunisia, Ennahda calls for dialogue and says it is ready for early elections

After a day of clashes in front of Tunisia's army-barricaded parliament on Monday (26 July), the situation in Tunis has calmed down. Following President Kaïs Saïed's move to "freeze" the parliament's activities for 30 days and dismiss his prime minister, Hichem Mechichi, on Sunday, the latter said he was ready to hand responsibility to whomever the president chooses as his new premier.

The president took these decisions at a time when the country is hit hard by an economic and social crisis accentuated by the Covid-19 pandemic. Anger arose amongst the main party in parliament, Ennahda, who supports Mechichi and denounced on Monday "a coup against the Revolution and the Constitution".

On Tuesday (27 July), following a meeting held the night before, Ennahda said in a press release that it was ready "for the holding of simultaneous legislative and presidential elections to guarantee the protection of the democratic process, in order to avoid that any delay does not serve as pretext for the maintenance of an autocratic mode". The Islamist party nonetheless continues to denounce “a coup against the Constitution and the institutions".

Ennahda declined to call for protests, asking instead for its supporters to stay home to avoid any violence following Monday's street clashes. In a similarly pacifist manner, the party called for national dialogue to get the country out of the political, social, economic and health crisis.

"We have decided to campaign peacefully to defeat this project (of President Saïed) and we call on the president to reverse this decision," Noureddine B'Hiri, a leader of the Ennahda party, told Agence France-Presse (AFP).

Ennahda's desire to avoid any escalation is shared by the international community, which has urged the Tunisian executive to restore the stability and functioning of the country's democratic institutions as soon as possible.

Indeed, several countries have voiced their concern, not only regarding the fragility of Tunisia's democracy, but also in regards to the socio-economic consequences of the current situation. For instance, Italy – one of the main "gateways" to Europe for migrants, especially from the African continent – fears that the protracted crises in Tunisia may result in a drastic increase in migrants arriving from Tunisia. Italian authorities believe numbers could potentially reach up to 15,000 by the end of the year.

According to a source in the Italian Interior Ministry, “the political turmoil could exacerbate the economic crisis in Tunisia, which is already severe due to the impact of the pandemic". In an attempt to avoid such a situation from unfolding, Italian Foreign Minister Luigi Di Maio immediately called on the EU Commission for help, asking for increased co-operation with Tunisia to solve the local economic crisis and discourage the departure of migrants. Like his French and German counterparts, Di Maio believes the Tunisian crisis can be "solved through democracy".

Also on Tuesday, EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, issued a statement in which he said that the EU was following developments in Tunisia very closely, adding:

"The country’s commitment to democracy, and respect for the rule of law, for the Constitution and for the legislative framework must be maintained, while remaining attuned to the wishes and aspirations of the Tunisian people. We therefore call for institutional stability to be restored as quickly as possible, and in particular for parliamentary activity to resume, for fundamental rights to be respected and for all forms of violence to be avoided.

"We will continue to closely monitor the situation as it develops, while recalling the considerable support that the European Union and its Member States have shown Tunisia in the context of a major pandemic and economic crisis. Preserving democracy and stability in the country is a priority."

 

source: commonspace.eu with Agence France-Presse (Paris) and agencies
photo: protests in Tunisia; picture courtesy of al Jazeera, Doha

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)