The statement of the Minsk Group co-Chairmen triggers reaction in Baku and Yerevan

On Saturday, 9 March, the three co-Chairmen of the OSCE Minsk Process, mandated by the international community to facilitate the process for a peaceful solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, issued what for them is an unusually long statement in which they urged the parties to the conflict to remain focused on the upcoming summit between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan under their auspices and underlined "the importance of maintaining an environment conducive to productive discussions".

read more: International community tries to keep Armenia and Azerbaijan focused on conflict settlement

The statement immediately triggered a response from both Baku and Yerevan. The foreign ministries of Armenia and Azerbaijan issued statements through their spokespersons on the same day, both giving their own spin to the statement, and as often happened in the past, highlighting the bits they found most convenient. Over the last forty eight hours, numerous commentators, experts and political parties have joined the chorus in pretty much the same vein. Not exactly what the co-Chairmen had in mind when they issued the statement, but it quite accurately reflects the highly polorised situation within public opinion on both sides of the conflict divide.

This is the background for other events happening these days. In Azerbaijan, the Ministry of Defence launched large military manoevres on Monday morning (11 March). Azerbaijani military sources told the media that "the exercises involve up to 10,000 military personnel, up to 500 tanks and other armoured vehicles, up to 300 missiles and artillery systems of different calibre, multiple launch rocket systems, and mortars, up to 20 army and front-line  aircraft."

The sources said that "in the course of the exercise, troops will implement tasks of preparing an offensive operation, striking an imaginary enemy in several directions, breaking through its defence, and defeating military groups, as well as launching missile and artillery strikes against military and strategic targets located in the enemy's defensive depth. At the same time, combat firing will be carried out in training centres and combined-arms ranges using new weapons systems, including the practical launch of missiles."

Armenia has condemned the exercises and said that Azerbaijan failed to give advance notice, as it was due to under several international obligations.

In Armenia meanwhile, opposition forces of various shades have used the statement of the co-Chairmen of the OSCE Minsk process to attack the government of Nikol Pashinyan. On Monday morning Pashinyan travelled to Stepanakert on a military helicopter and was met at Stepanakert airport by the leadership of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. Pashinyan was accompanied by his wife Anna Hakobyan.

A government source in Yerevan said that Pashinyan has convened on Tuesday a meeting of the Armenian National Security Council in Stepanakert. This is a highly unusual, perhaps even unprecedented step, and it is not clear what will be discussed in this meeting.

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Nikol Pashinyan arrives in Stepanakert on Monday (11 March) and is greeted by Bako Sahakyan, president of the self-declared Nagorno Karabakh Republic (picture courtesy of ARMENPRESS, Yerevan)

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan calls for bigger voice for Central Asia in the UN

Uzbekistan called for a more effective and representative United Nations on September 23, as presidential administration chief Saida Mirziyoyeva used her address to the UN General Assembly to seek support for the country’s candidacy for a nonpermanent Security Council seat in 2035–2036. Speaking at the Assembly’s 81st session in New York, Mirziyoyeva argued that international cooperation remains necessary despite growing geopolitical divisions. She endorsed UN Secretary-General António Guterres’ UN80 reform initiative and called for an expanded Security Council, arguing that international rules should be applied consistently rather than according to the interests of powerful states. Uzbekistan’s planned chairmanship of the Non-Aligned Movement in 2027 was presented as another platform for promoting dialogue. Her emphasis on multilateralism also fits a broader Central Asian effort to increase the region’s role in international institutions. Kyrgyzstan, for example, will hold its first Security Council seat in 2027–2028. Mirziyoyeva also highlighted regional cooperation, pointing to improved relations among Central Asian states over longstanding border and water disputes. On Afghanistan, she urged countries not to view it solely as a security threat, stressing the importance of creating conditions for peaceful development. She linked Uzbekistan’s international agenda to domestic reforms, citing economic growth, falling poverty and expanded education. Climate and water security also featured prominently, with the Aral Sea serving as an example of the consequences of poor environmental management. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)