"Peace Bridge" between Armenian and Azerbaijani civil society encounters first challenge

The visit organised by the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry for diplomats to Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding regions caused a stir in some quarters in Armenian society, and in turn a reaction in Azerbaijan. The controversy exposed the fragility of the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process. For the diplomats, whose governments clearly recognise Nagorno-Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan, the controversy is a storm in a tea cup, but for some Armenians the loss of Karabakh remains a raw sensitive issue.

Caught in the eye of the storm has been the initiative "Bridge for Peace" which was set up in October of last year, by the governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan, as an expression of civil society engagement in the peace process between them. The group has already organised several visits across the old conflict divide.

Another visit, involving thirty civil society Azerbaijani representatives to Armenia was due imminently, but according to reports, has now been postponed.

Both sides of "Bridge for Peace" have issued statements, and it is clear  that the initiative has encountered its first challnege. Yet observers believe that as long as the two governments keep supporting the initiative, it  will survive.

Here are the statements issued in Baku and Yerevan by "Bridge for Peace"

The Azerbaijani view:

The Azerbaijani Initiative Group "Bridge of Peace" expresses deep disappointment over the hostile reaction of the media and the unacceptable tone of public discourse in Armenia regarding the visit of the diplomatic corps to the Karabakh and East Zangezur regions of the Republic of Azerbaijan on September 11-12, 2026.

First of all, the visit of the diplomatic corps to the sovereign territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan should not in itself be a subject of controversy. In particular, verbal attacks against ambassadors and countries for participating in such a visit are disturbing and contradict Armenia's recognition of Azerbaijan's sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Azerbaijan and Armenia are currently in a post-conflict period, and both countries face the difficult task of overcoming decades of conflict. Through peace initiatives, we, as civil society representatives, with the support of the governments of Azerbaijan and Armenia, are taking steps to facilitate the peace process, encourage dialogue, and support confidence-building measures.

The cultural heritage on the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan belongs to the Azerbaijani people and is under the protection of the state.

To ensure justice, cultural heritage issues must be discussed on the basis of reciprocity and open dialogue. To advance these goals, civil society representatives have created a platform for professional discussion of issues that form an integral part of the peace process agenda between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

The peace process must not be allowed to come under pressure from revanchist forces, as this would seriously jeopardize further progress on the path to peace. We call on Armenian society to demonstrate a responsible approach to this issue and not succumb to the provocations of those with malicious intentions both in Armenia and abroad.

Farhad Mamedov
Kamalya Mamedova
Rusif Huseynov
Dilyara Efendieva
Ramil Iskenderli

The Armenian view:

The members of the Peace Bridge Initiative Armenia express their concern over recent developments related to the presentation of Armenian cultural heritage during the visit of diplomats to the Gandzasar medieval monastic complex and its adjacent museum.

At a time when significant progress has already been made in the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process, and when both societies are expected to continue moving, after decades of conflict, towards a new culture of relations, public statements and actions matter.

Recent developments deepen mistrust and create additional space for those who argue that dialogue is meaningless and that efforts to achieve peace are futile. Building peace requires difficult and honest conversations, attention to each other’s concerns, and a conscious effort to avoid actions that may reopen wounds or reinforce hostility.

We therefore call on all actors involved in the peace process to act with the responsibility required at this moment and to refrain from statements and actions that may be perceived as unconstructive.

Areg Kochinyan

Naira Sultanyan

Boris Navarsardyan

Narek Minasyan 

Samvel Meliksetyan
 

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Armenian and Azerbaijani members of Peace Bridge with Azerbaijani presidential advisor, Hikmet Hacijev

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

In Ethiopia, government forces take rebel capital

Government forces in Ethiopia, have taken control of the town of Mekelle, capital of the Tigray region. Earlier, Ethiopia's federal military said it had recaptured the main airport in the capital of the northern Tigray region, dealing a major setback to an ​opposition alliance in its stronghold. Clashes pitting a rebel alliance led by Tigray's ruling party ‌against the government and its allied forces broke out in northern Ethiopia last week, in the most serious escalation of violence since a 2020-2022 civil war. The fighting has stoked fears that it could escalate into a wider regional conflict, potentially drawing in neighbouring ​countries in the Horn of Africa and the Gulf. In recent days Ethiopia and Eritrea broke off diplomatic relations amid mutual accusations. In Washington, State Department spokesman Tommy Pigott ​said the United States strongly urged Ethiopia and Eritrea to "exercise maximum restraint and return ⁠to dialogue and cooperation as agreed in their 2018 peace framework." "The Horn of Africa cannot sustain another ​military conflict and humanitarian crisis," Pigott said. "A conflict jeopardizes ongoing U.S. collaboration on shared interests with both countries." The ​federal government in Addis Ababa accused Eritrea of supporting the rebel alliance alongside Sudan and Egypt. The three countries deny this. Troops from the Ethiopian National Defence Forces had regained control of Alula Aba ​Nega Airport in Tigray's capital Mekelle,   A Mekelle resident who asked not to be named for security reasons, confirmed the ‌taking of ⁠the airport by government forces and added they could hear gunfire outside the city centre. This source said they had seen some Tigrayan Defence Force fighters abandoning their posts and heading home, and that there was looting of government facilities taking place in the city. Mekelle's airport, which ​is around 10 km (6 miles) from the centre of the city, was ​one of three ⁠airports in the region that were seized by the opposition forces at the start of the fighting on September 23. The taking of Mekelle by government forces would be a major setback for the opposition alliance, although analysts say ⁠it ​would be unlikely to end the conflict. In 2020, federal forces captured ​Mekelle within the first month of the two year war before the TPLF reclaimed it seven months later.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)