"Peace Bridge" between Armenian and Azerbaijani civil society encounters first challenge

The visit organised by the Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry for diplomats to Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding regions caused a stir in some quarters in Armenian society, and in turn a reaction in Azerbaijan. The controversy exposed the fragility of the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process. For the diplomats, whose governments clearly recognise Nagorno-Karabakh as part of Azerbaijan, the controversy is a storm in a tea cup, but for some Armenians the loss of Karabakh remains a raw sensitive issue.

Caught in the eye of the storm has been the initiative "Bridge for Peace" which was set up in October of last year, by the governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan, as an expression of civil society engagement in the peace process between them. The group has already organised several visits across the old conflict divide.

Another visit, involving thirty civil society Azerbaijani representatives to Armenia was due imminently, but according to reports, has now been postponed.

Both sides of "Bridge for Peace" have issued statements, and it is clear  that the initiative has encountered its first challnege. Yet observers believe that as long as the two governments keep supporting the initiative, it  will survive.

Here are the statements issued in Baku and Yerevan by "Bridge for Peace"

The Azerbaijani view:

The Azerbaijani Initiative Group "Bridge of Peace" expresses deep disappointment over the hostile reaction of the media and the unacceptable tone of public discourse in Armenia regarding the visit of the diplomatic corps to the Karabakh and East Zangezur regions of the Republic of Azerbaijan on September 11-12, 2026.

First of all, the visit of the diplomatic corps to the sovereign territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan should not in itself be a subject of controversy. In particular, verbal attacks against ambassadors and countries for participating in such a visit are disturbing and contradict Armenia's recognition of Azerbaijan's sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Azerbaijan and Armenia are currently in a post-conflict period, and both countries face the difficult task of overcoming decades of conflict. Through peace initiatives, we, as civil society representatives, with the support of the governments of Azerbaijan and Armenia, are taking steps to facilitate the peace process, encourage dialogue, and support confidence-building measures.

The cultural heritage on the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan belongs to the Azerbaijani people and is under the protection of the state.

To ensure justice, cultural heritage issues must be discussed on the basis of reciprocity and open dialogue. To advance these goals, civil society representatives have created a platform for professional discussion of issues that form an integral part of the peace process agenda between Azerbaijan and Armenia.

The peace process must not be allowed to come under pressure from revanchist forces, as this would seriously jeopardize further progress on the path to peace. We call on Armenian society to demonstrate a responsible approach to this issue and not succumb to the provocations of those with malicious intentions both in Armenia and abroad.

Farhad Mamedov
Kamalya Mamedova
Rusif Huseynov
Dilyara Efendieva
Ramil Iskenderli

The Armenian view:

The members of the Peace Bridge Initiative Armenia express their concern over recent developments related to the presentation of Armenian cultural heritage during the visit of diplomats to the Gandzasar medieval monastic complex and its adjacent museum.

At a time when significant progress has already been made in the Armenia-Azerbaijan peace process, and when both societies are expected to continue moving, after decades of conflict, towards a new culture of relations, public statements and actions matter.

Recent developments deepen mistrust and create additional space for those who argue that dialogue is meaningless and that efforts to achieve peace are futile. Building peace requires difficult and honest conversations, attention to each other’s concerns, and a conscious effort to avoid actions that may reopen wounds or reinforce hostility.

We therefore call on all actors involved in the peace process to act with the responsibility required at this moment and to refrain from statements and actions that may be perceived as unconstructive.

Areg Kochinyan

Naira Sultanyan

Boris Navarsardyan

Narek Minasyan 

Samvel Meliksetyan
 

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Armenian and Azerbaijani members of Peace Bridge with Azerbaijani presidential advisor, Hikmet Hacijev

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia

Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia

In elections on both sides of the Atlantic, that are likely to have deep implications for their respective regions, one incumbent won, another lost. In Brazil, Latin America's biggest country, left-wing President Lula won a fourth term in office, defeating his right-wing challenger Flávio Bolsonaro. The 80-year-old, took just under 52% of the vote in a run-off on Sunday. Lula thanked cheering supporters in São Paulo and said he had defended Brazil's democracy. His opponent, Flavio Bolsonaro - who won the first round - says the result is "inexplicable" and called for it to be annulled. His father, ex-president Jair Bolsonaro, is currently serving a jail sentence under house arrest for plotting a coup after losing the last election. This election was bitterly fought - and it bucks a wider regional trend towards right-wing leaders. On the other side of the Atlantic, in Serbia, long-standing leader Aleksandar Vučić has admitted defeat to the student-led protest movement in snap parliamentary elections. "We still do not have final results... it is clear that we have lost these elections," the right-wing populist leader said as he conceded late on Sunday. Preliminary figures from Serbia's election commission indicated a record high turnout, which commentators had suggested would favour the student movement. Celebrations erupted after Vučić conceded. Vučić called the snap elections after two years of protests triggered by the collapse of a train station canopy in the city of Novi Sad, which killed 16 and was seen as emblematic of corruption and negligence. Both election results are going to have a deep impact on their respective regions.
Editor's choice
News
UN Security Council will discuss "Children and Armed Conflict" on Monday

UN Security Council will discuss "Children and Armed Conflict" on Monday

On Monday (26 October), the United Nations Security Council will hold an open briefing to mark the 30th anniversary of the establishment of the children and armed conflict mandate by the General Assembly. Greek Minister of Foreign Affairs Giorgos Gerapetritis is expected to chair the meeting, which is a signature event of Greece’s October Council presidency. The anticipated briefers are Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict Vanessa Frazier; UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell; the Special Envoy for Children Affected by Armed Conflict of the African Union (AU), Jainaba Jagne; and the Director of Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict, Bethany Ellis. Greece served as the chair of the Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict in 2025, but has yet to be reappointed this year due to the ongoing delays in the allocation of subsidiary body chairs. It has nonetheless continued to prioritise the agenda, including by promoting a resolution addressing the impact of digital technologies on the perpetration of violations and abuses against children, which was adopted unanimously on 19 October as resolution 2832 and was co-sponsored by 93 member states. (For more information, see our 18 October What’s in Blue story.) In addition to organising tomorrow’s signature event, Greece invited civil society briefers focusing on the protection of children to two Council meetings—on Yemen and Syria, on 9 and 12 October, respectively—and chaired a meeting of the Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict on 13 October. Greece has circulated a concept note ahead of tomorrow’s meeting, which says that the briefing aims to assess the progress achieved in the 30 years since the children and armed conflict agenda was established as well as the challenges it faces. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)