Menu
Latest
Menu
Latest
News

Morocco elections: prospect of a woman prime minister

24 September 2026

Parliamentary elections were held in Morocco on 23 rd September, and as a result the country is on the verge of appointing its first female prime minister after Fatima Ezzahra El Mansouri's party emerged victorious in parliamentary elections, putting the prominent politician among the leading contenders to head the next government.

The Authenticity and Modernity Party (PAM) won 97 seats in Wednesday’s election, according to preliminary results announced by the interior ministry, making it the largest party in Morocco's 395-seat House of Representatives.

It finished ahead of its outgoing coalition partners, the National Rally of Independents (RNI), which secured 66 seats, and the Istiqlal Party with 65.

The result has turned attention to Mansouri, one of Morocco’s most prominent female politicians and a leading figure in PAM.

If King Mohammed VI appoints her to lead the next government, the 50-year-old would become the first woman to serve as prime minister and only the second woman to head a government in the Arab world, after Tunisia's Najla Bouden.

Under Article 47 of the constitution, the king appoints the head of government from the political party that comes first in elections to the House of Representatives.

That means the next prime minister should come from PAM, but it does not automatically mean the job goes to the party’s leader.

Mansouri is among the names being discussed for the post, alongside other senior PAM figures.

One potential rival is Fouzi Lekjaa, Morocco’s budget minister and president of the Royal Moroccan Football Federation, who joined PAM ahead of the election.

Another name floated in Moroccan media is Mohamed Mehdi Bensaid, who served as youth, culture and communications minister in the outgoing government.

The decision ultimately rests with King Mohammed VI.

PAM will also have to negotiate a coalition after falling well short of the 198 seats needed for an outright parliamentary majority.

Its outgoing coalition partners could provide the numbers. PAM, the RNI and Istiqlal together secured 228 seats according to the preliminary results, although the shape of the next governing coalition has yet to be determined.

Who is  Azzahra El Mansouri?

Born in Marrakech in 1976, Mansouri trained as a lawyer before entering politics following PAM's establishment in 2008.

She rose to national prominence the following year when she became mayor of Marrakech, the first woman to hold the position.

Mansouri returned to the mayoralty following the 2021 elections and was appointed minister of national territorial planning, urban planning, housing and city policy in the government of outgoing Prime Minister Aziz Akhannouch.

She further strengthened her position within PAM in 2024 when she took a leading role in the party's collective leadership.

Her party's victory has now placed her within reach of Morocco’s most senior government post.

Mansouri has sought to present herself as a politician whose career has been built through party politics and local government rather than her gender.

She has also rejected descriptions of herself as an "iron woman", previously describing herself instead as a “free activist”.

PAM emerged as the largest party with 97 seats, gaining 10 compared with the previous parliament.

The RNI, which led the outgoing government, fell to 66 seats, while Istiqlal secured 65.

The Islamist Justice and Development Party (PJD) staged one of the election's biggest comebacks, winning 54 seats after securing just 13 in the 2021 election.

The PJD had led Morocco's government for a decade before suffering a dramatic electoral collapse five years ago.

Its campaign this year included strong opposition to Morocco’s deepening ties with Israel, an issue that has generated considerable public anger since the start of Israel’s war on Gaza.

Morocco normalised relations with Israel in 2020 as part of the US-brokered Abraham Accords, when the PJD itself was leading the government.

The election also took place against a backdrop of economic and social discontent, including high youth unemployment and the aftermath of Gen Z-led protests.

Turnout stood at just 38 percent, the lowest level recorded in a Morroccan Parliamentary Election since 2007.

 source: commonspace.eu with New Arab (London) and agencies.

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?
Trending

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

19 October 2026
Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
News
King calls slave trade a 'shameful chapter' during Commonwealth address
Trending

King calls slave trade a 'shameful chapter' during Commonwealth address

4 November 2026
King Charles has described the transatlantic slave trade as a "shameful chapter of history" that filled him with "profound sorrow" as he opened a summit of Commonwealth leaders in the Caribbean. He said the trade in enslaved persons "still casts a shadow" over the association of nations. There have been calls from some for the UK to make a formal apology for its historic role in the slave trade ahead of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (Chogm) in Antigua and Barbuda, but there was not one in the King's address. Prime Minister Andy Burnham, also at the summit, has said that he is open to Britain issuing a formal apology but has ruled out financial reparations. While there was no direct apology, the King did offer some contrition - and there was also an acknowledgement that he had personally learnt more about the legacy of the slave trade. He said: "The transatlantic trade in enslaved persons still casts a shadow over these islands and other members of our Commonwealth. "As I have said before, that shameful chapter of history is one that fills my heart with horror and my soul with the most profound personal sorrow." (click image to read more).

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest
Trending

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

7 September 2026
Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Dennis Sammut
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”
Trending

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

21 September 2026
There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)
Dennis Sammut