Mali suspended from regional organisations, ECOWAS and the African Union, over coup

Last week’s coup in Mali led by Colonel Assimi Goïta – since named transitional president of the country – has been met with severe backlash from both the regional and international communities. Whilst the European Union and France have threatened to impose sanctions on the country, the Economic Community of Western African States (ECOWAS) and the African Union (AU) have both now suspended Mali’s memberships. 

ECOWAS was the first to take the decision on Sunday (May 30). "After long discussions, the heads of state and government have decided to suspend Mali from the institutions of the Community of West African States (ECOWAS)", a press release by the ten heads of state present during an extraordinary summit in Accra stated.

The heads of state called for strict adherence to the transition timetable, that had been adopted last September after the coup of 18 August, and for a civilian prime minister to be appointed with an inclusive government to continue the transition program. However, no economic sanctions have been taken and Colonel Assimi Goïta remains in his post.

Suspension from ECOWAS means that Mali, until further notice, will no longer be able to attend sessions of heads of state, councils of ministers or sessions of the parliament of the sub-regional institution. 

Two days after Mali’s ECOWAS suspension, the AU followed suit and threatened Mali with sanctions were power not returned to the civilian transitional government. Moreover, according to a decision by the AU's Peace and Security Council, laid out in a statement published on Tuesday (1 June) evening, Mali is immediately barred from participating in African Union activities. 

In this statement, the Union said that it was "deeply concerned about the evolving situation in Mali and its negative impact on the gains made thus far in the transition process in the country." It also called for a return to the transition process, the release of all political stakeholders – including the Bah Ndaw and Moctar Ouane, the leaders of the transitional government formed last year, who are under house arrest – and for authorities to respect the 18-month transition period original stipulated in the agreement. 

Furthermore, the AU "strongly urges the Malian military to urgently and unconditionally return to the barracks, and to refrain from further interference in the political processes in Mali." Like much of the international community and civil society groups, the AU urges Mali to give the power back to the civilians to lead the transition. 

 

Source: commonspace.eu with agencies
Photo: ECOWAS emergency summit, Accra, 30 May 2021; Bayo Omoboriowo (President of Nigeria/Official Photographer)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.