Mali coup leader named as president

Mali's constitutional court on Friday (28 May) named coup leader, Colonel Assimi Goïta, as the country's transitional president. Col Goïta had already declared himself interim president on Wednesday, two days after seizing power in a military coup. The court said this was due to the "vacancy in the presidency".

This was the second military coup led  by Colonel Goïta in nine months. Goïta led the first coup on 18 August 2020, which removed the elected president, Ibrahim Boubacar Keïta, from office. The military intervention was justified on the basis of Keïta’s weak leadership and tolerance for corruption, which had led the public and opposition politicians to welcome it. 

This year’s coup, however, was met with far less approval from the Malian population, as well as considerable condemnation from civil society groups, national politicians and the international community. 

On 24 May, the transitional president, Bah Ndaw, and transitional prime minister, Moctar Ouane, were arrested and forcibly led to the Kati military camp, mirroring Keïta’s arrest nine months earlier. Goïta proceeded by putting the leaders out of their prerogatives, according to a statement read on national television the following day. Ultimately, the transitional leaders announced their resignation this week, on May 26, prompting their liberation from the camp that same night. 

By liberating Ndaw and Ouane, Colonel Goïta and the other coup plotters complied with a request made by United Nations Security Council on Wednesday. Indeed, at the request of French president Emmanuel Macron, an extraordinary meeting took place in New York where members had strongly condemned the arrests and demanded respect for the initial timetable of the transition directed by civilians. Although the first issue has been resolved, the immediate resumption of a civilian-led transition seems far away as Goïta intends to take head of the transition, diplomats have announced.

As a response, the international community is threatening sanctions. The European Union is “ready in the coming hours to take targeted sanctions” against those responsible, Macron said in Brussels after a summit of bloc’s 27 leaders. ECOWAS also mentioned the possibility of imposing sanctions, as it did after the 2020 coup. The United States, for its part, has suspended assistance to the Malian security and defence forces, the state department has announced.

As Mali is already greatly hurt by its lasting security crisis and by the pandemic, economic sanctions could increasingly weaken the state by causing considerable damage for its population and economy. Moreover, if the country’s government remains internationally unrecognised as legitimate, this risks compromising the Malian army’s collaboration with the French and other European military forces which are currently deployed in operations against the jihadists.

 

Source: commonspace.eu with agencies
Photo: Army officers announce a military coup in Mali in August 2020 (screen grab from ORTM TV)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)