Mali coup leader named as president

Mali's constitutional court on Friday (28 May) named coup leader, Colonel Assimi Goïta, as the country's transitional president. Col Goïta had already declared himself interim president on Wednesday, two days after seizing power in a military coup. The court said this was due to the "vacancy in the presidency".

This was the second military coup led  by Colonel Goïta in nine months. Goïta led the first coup on 18 August 2020, which removed the elected president, Ibrahim Boubacar Keïta, from office. The military intervention was justified on the basis of Keïta’s weak leadership and tolerance for corruption, which had led the public and opposition politicians to welcome it. 

This year’s coup, however, was met with far less approval from the Malian population, as well as considerable condemnation from civil society groups, national politicians and the international community. 

On 24 May, the transitional president, Bah Ndaw, and transitional prime minister, Moctar Ouane, were arrested and forcibly led to the Kati military camp, mirroring Keïta’s arrest nine months earlier. Goïta proceeded by putting the leaders out of their prerogatives, according to a statement read on national television the following day. Ultimately, the transitional leaders announced their resignation this week, on May 26, prompting their liberation from the camp that same night. 

By liberating Ndaw and Ouane, Colonel Goïta and the other coup plotters complied with a request made by United Nations Security Council on Wednesday. Indeed, at the request of French president Emmanuel Macron, an extraordinary meeting took place in New York where members had strongly condemned the arrests and demanded respect for the initial timetable of the transition directed by civilians. Although the first issue has been resolved, the immediate resumption of a civilian-led transition seems far away as Goïta intends to take head of the transition, diplomats have announced.

As a response, the international community is threatening sanctions. The European Union is “ready in the coming hours to take targeted sanctions” against those responsible, Macron said in Brussels after a summit of bloc’s 27 leaders. ECOWAS also mentioned the possibility of imposing sanctions, as it did after the 2020 coup. The United States, for its part, has suspended assistance to the Malian security and defence forces, the state department has announced.

As Mali is already greatly hurt by its lasting security crisis and by the pandemic, economic sanctions could increasingly weaken the state by causing considerable damage for its population and economy. Moreover, if the country’s government remains internationally unrecognised as legitimate, this risks compromising the Malian army’s collaboration with the French and other European military forces which are currently deployed in operations against the jihadists.

 

Source: commonspace.eu with agencies
Photo: Army officers announce a military coup in Mali in August 2020 (screen grab from ORTM TV)

Related articles

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)