Mali coup leader named as president

Mali's constitutional court on Friday (28 May) named coup leader, Colonel Assimi Goïta, as the country's transitional president. Col Goïta had already declared himself interim president on Wednesday, two days after seizing power in a military coup. The court said this was due to the "vacancy in the presidency".

This was the second military coup led  by Colonel Goïta in nine months. Goïta led the first coup on 18 August 2020, which removed the elected president, Ibrahim Boubacar Keïta, from office. The military intervention was justified on the basis of Keïta’s weak leadership and tolerance for corruption, which had led the public and opposition politicians to welcome it. 

This year’s coup, however, was met with far less approval from the Malian population, as well as considerable condemnation from civil society groups, national politicians and the international community. 

On 24 May, the transitional president, Bah Ndaw, and transitional prime minister, Moctar Ouane, were arrested and forcibly led to the Kati military camp, mirroring Keïta’s arrest nine months earlier. Goïta proceeded by putting the leaders out of their prerogatives, according to a statement read on national television the following day. Ultimately, the transitional leaders announced their resignation this week, on May 26, prompting their liberation from the camp that same night. 

By liberating Ndaw and Ouane, Colonel Goïta and the other coup plotters complied with a request made by United Nations Security Council on Wednesday. Indeed, at the request of French president Emmanuel Macron, an extraordinary meeting took place in New York where members had strongly condemned the arrests and demanded respect for the initial timetable of the transition directed by civilians. Although the first issue has been resolved, the immediate resumption of a civilian-led transition seems far away as Goïta intends to take head of the transition, diplomats have announced.

As a response, the international community is threatening sanctions. The European Union is “ready in the coming hours to take targeted sanctions” against those responsible, Macron said in Brussels after a summit of bloc’s 27 leaders. ECOWAS also mentioned the possibility of imposing sanctions, as it did after the 2020 coup. The United States, for its part, has suspended assistance to the Malian security and defence forces, the state department has announced.

As Mali is already greatly hurt by its lasting security crisis and by the pandemic, economic sanctions could increasingly weaken the state by causing considerable damage for its population and economy. Moreover, if the country’s government remains internationally unrecognised as legitimate, this risks compromising the Malian army’s collaboration with the French and other European military forces which are currently deployed in operations against the jihadists.

 

Source: commonspace.eu with agencies
Photo: Army officers announce a military coup in Mali in August 2020 (screen grab from ORTM TV)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.