Lavrov explains Russia's role in Karabakh

Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov on Monday (18 January) spoke extensively on the Nagorno-Karabakh issue and developments following the 10 November trilateral agreement between Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia that ended the Karabakh War.

The future status of Nagorno-Karabakh and the role of the Minsk Group

Lavrov dismissed suggestions that Nagorno-Karabakh be annexed to Russia and said that the status issue needs to be resolved between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Lavrov was speaking at the annual marathon new year press conference where he reviewed the work of his ministry in 2020.

He said the issue of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh should be resolved between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Russia is ready to help in finding a solution that will contribute to ensuring peace and stability in the region.  Lavrov indicated that there will be a role for the OSCE Minsk Group in resolving the status problem, clarifying some confusion that had existed since November about the possible demise of the Group and its three co-chair, Russia, France and the United States.

"As for the exotic proposal to include Nagorno-Karabakh in the Russian Federation. You know, as I understand it, the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh is not recognized by anyone, including the Republic of Armenia. We have no such thoughts. We proceed from the fact that all issues of this region should be resolved between the countries located here, primarily between Armenia and Azerbaijan. We will be ready to help the search and finding such a solution that will ensure peace, stability, security in this region, "the Russian Foreign Minister said.  

He added that the status of Nagorno-Karabakh was deliberately not mentioned in the joint statement of the three leaders. "The territory on which the Russian peacekeepers are deployed is the zone of responsibility of the Russian peacekeeping contingent. It is from this that we proceed in our contacts with Yerevan and Baku. Now such nuances are being worked out, I would say the details related to the organization of transport communication, supplying the zone of responsibility of peacekeepers , rendering humanitarian assistance to the people who returned there. Already 50 thousand Armenians have returned there from Armenia, "he explained.

The minister emphasized that "the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs will also deal with the issue of the status of the region." "They have now resumed their contacts with the parties, they are going to go to the region again," he added.

"Exactly because the problem of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh is so contradictory, if we take the positions of Yerevan and Baku, and it was decided by the three leaders to bypass this issue and leave it for later, for the future," Lavrov said.

The minister also stated that there are no secret supplements to the trilateral statement of the leaders of Russia, Azerbaijan and Armenia. 

"[The agreement of] November 9, I believe, is being implemented quite effectively, this is an assessment of both President Aliyev and Prime Minister Pashinyan. With the exception of the prisoners of war question, which, I repeat, in its current form, arose in early December - a month after the agreements were signed. Everything else there, in my opinion, is being done quite effectively, the issue of the mandate of the peacekeepers is being resolved. It should, of course, be the subject of a trilateral agreement, this was discussed in Moscow at the meeting on January 11. There are no secret attachments, and I don’t see what topics can be in such attachments.

The diplomat added that the discussion of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh will become possible in the future, and this topic has yet to be returned, but at the moment it would be premature.

"I really hope that now emotions will be relegated to the background. By the way, this is exactly why now is not the best time to put forward the topic of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh as a priority, it remains for the future," he said.

"And we will have to return to the status. The main thing is that the status should subsequently be concrete, calm legal discussions between Armenia and Azerbaijan on the basis of the good-neighbourliness that we all need to restore in the region," Lavrov summed up.

related content on commonspace.eu: Opinion: The elusive quest for peace in the South Caucasus

Connection between Armenia and Karabakh

Lavrov stated that he sees no reason to obstruct contacts between Armenian officials and Nagorno-Karabakh.

The minister noted that in addition to the agreement on the Lachin corridor, which will have a new route, "a reliable, permanent connection will be laid between the western regions of the main territory of Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan, and this is an agreement confirmed by the heads of state."

"If we agree, and everyone agrees with this, that there should be a connection between the Armenians of Karabakh and the Armenians of Armenia, then I see no reason why it is necessary to hinder contacts at this level," the Russian Foreign Minister said.

He recalled that "Armenian officials are involved in providing humanitarian assistance to Nagorno-Karabakh, which does not cause any negative emotions in Baku, and it would be strange if it were otherwise." At the same time, according to Lavrov, "the fact that these Armenian officials make quite politicized statements in Karabakh probably causes tension."

"I believe it would be better to avoid this. We have already witnessed how emotional statements made from Karabakh or about Karabakh, how a word becomes a material force, in this case, words from different sides have become a very negative material force," - explained the minister. He added that Moscow is now paying special attention to "establishing contacts between the leaderships of Azerbaijan and Armenia, creating an atmosphere of trust."

Foreign Minister Lavrov stressed that the question of cutting off Nagorno-Karabakh from Armenia never arose. He recalled that the agreements between Moscow, Baku and Yerevan contain the agreement of the parties to ensure communication between Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh through the Lachin corridor, which will be under the control of Russian peacekeepers. "No one has ever denied Armenia's connection with Karabakh, throughout all the decades of negotiations there has never been a question of cutting off Armenia and Karabakh from each other. And that is why the Lachin corridor as a concept was not rejected by anyone, and it is still the subject of agreement between the parties, including the consent of our Azerbaijani neighbours" Lavrov said.

Presence of Russian peacekeepers and exchange of prisoners

Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh will ensure the interests of both Azerbaijan and Armenia, Lavrov said.

"I guarantee you one hundred percent that the zone of responsibility of the Russian peacekeepers is a form that will ensure the interests of both the Azerbaijani and Armenian sides," Lavrov said.

The minister also added that Russia is seeking an exchange of prisoners of war between Armenia and Azerbaijan on the principle of "everyone for everyone", the Russian military, together with colleagues from these countries, are checking the lists of those detained in the Hadrut region of Nagorno-Karabakh. doo.

"As for the prisoners of war. This was really discussed, this is part of the agreements that were signed on the night of November 9-10. And also, when the President of Azerbaijan [Ilham Aliyev] and the Prime Minister of Armenia [Nikol Pashinyan] arrived in Moscow on January 11 [2021 These people, abandoned in this [Hadrut] region after the announcement of a ceasefire and all hostilities, should be considered a separate issue, and not as falling under the November 9 (agreement). We, nevertheless, both President Putin and I are in contact with our colleagues, we are still promoting the need to consider this issue (exchange of prisoners of war) in order to close it, guided by the principle of "all for all," he said. According to Lavrov, "now our military [are] in contact with the military of Armenia, these lists of names are being verified with the Azerbaijani military in order to understand where these people may be."

As it turned out later in one of the conversations with Armenian Foreign Minister Ara Avazyan, there were much more prisoners of war than 62, as previously thought, Lavrov pointed out. "The topic exists, of course, and if it were not for our peacekeepers, it would probably be more difficult to solve. But the peacekeepers are doing this. The commander of the peacekeeping contingent, General [Rustam] Muradov [is] in contact with his Azerbaijani and Armenian colleagues," he said Lavrov.

The minister pointed out that while drawing up the lists for the exchange of prisoners of war, "the Armenians had the greatest problems." "Azerbaijan gave such lists, and they were insignificant. Those who were mentioned in the Azerbaijani lists were not immediately returned, but there were no more situations with the missing, with prisoners, with persons held by Azerbaijan.

From the Armenian side, [there were] exchanges of those who were participants in the events that ended on November 9. But now the main issue is one that arose in early December in the Hadrut region, when at the end of November a large group of Armenian servicemen <...> was directed there ", - he explained.

source: commonspace.eu with TASS news agency (Moscow)
photo: Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov
 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.