Kazakhstan rebuffs talk of joint EAEU response to Western sanctions

The government of Kazakhstan, in a statement issued on Saturday (5 June) rebuffed suggestions that the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) may respond jointly to Western sanctions against some of its members.

The idea of such a joint response was raised last week by Russian deputy foreign minister, Alexander Pankin, who said that the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), which brings together Belarus, Kazakhstan, Russia, Armenia and Kyrgyzstan, was working on a “consolidated response” to Western sanctions against some of its members. This was in reference to new sanctions imposed by the EU and the US against Russia and Belarus, including a recent EU decision to ban Belarusian airplanes from flying over EU airspace or landing in EU countries.

However, the foreign ministry of Kazakhstan, in a terse statement issued on Saturday, dismissed the suggestion, insisting "that the integration processes within the EAEU are of a purely economic nature", and reiterating that Kazakhstan was against "the politicization of the association".

The statement in full said:

"According to the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union, signed on May 29, 2014, the purpose of the association is to ensure freedom of movement of goods, services, capital and labor, to create conditions for the stable development of the economies of the member states in order to improve the well-being of their peoples.

"Kazakhstan adheres to the position that the integration processes within the EAEU are of a purely economic nature. Traditionally, we note the unacceptability of endowing the bodies of Eurasian integration with unusual functions, we oppose the politicization of the association.

"In the context of discussing initiatives that go beyond the subject of regulation of the Treaty on the EAEU, including the application of retaliatory measures to sanctions actions of third countries, we proceed from the assumption that Western sanctions are based primarily on political motives and are directed against individual states, and not the entire EAEU.

We note that the Republic of Kazakhstan does not conduct any negotiations on "consolidated measures" of the EAEU countries in response to sanctions from other states. In working with partners in Eurasian integration, we can only talk about joint actions to prevent the negative impact of such sanctions on the socio-economic development of our states."

related content on commonspace.eu: Opinion: Kazakhstan, Central Asia's giant, is stirring and the Russians are not amused

 

source: commonspace.eu with the press service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan
photo: The building of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan in Nur Sultan (archive picture)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.