ICC reports on war crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has reported strong evidence of ongoing war crimes and crimes against humanity in Sudan’s Darfur region. On Thursday (10 July), the ICC’s deputy prosecutor, Nazhat Shameem Khan, told the U.N. Security Council that current reports describe famine, attacks on hospitals and aid convoys, the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war, and the forced recruitment of children to fight as soldiers. Khan also argued that 'abductions for ransom had become common practice'.

Since the conflict erupted in April 2023 between Sudan’s military and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the ICC estimates that at least 40,000 people have died and nearly 13 million have been displaced. The RSF has been accused of ethnic massacres, particularly targeting the Masalit community in camps such as Zamzam. Furthermore, the systematic use of starvation and sexual violence in these campaigns may now qualify as genocide. The ICC has also found that Sudan’s military may be guilty of war crimes, crimes against humanity, or genocide in the region.

ICC investigators have gathered over 7,000 pieces of documentary and testimonial evidence, including interviews conducted in refugee camps in Chad. Khan warned that conditions in Darfur could still worsen.

Source: commonspace.eu with Al Jazeera and other agencies.

Related articles

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)