Georgian women ask for bigger role in politics

Women are playing an increasing role in Georgian politics, but some think it is not enough. Dato Parulava explores the issue in this article for commonspace.eu.

The political temperature is soon to hit boiling point in Georgia, with only two days left before parliamentary elections. As in the rest of the world, Georgian politicians habitually make promises on which they are less than keen. In Georgia, one such promise is establishing gender balance in politics.

Since long before these particular elections, women's rights advocates have been actively campaigning to establish equal gender representation of deputies in Georgia's parliament. An initiative with cross-party support ultimately failed to make it through parliament, but has made its mark on the future prospects for increased representation of women in the legislature.

Although 52% of Georgia's population are women, they make up only 12% of sitting lawmakers. This puts Georgia in 108th place among 140 countries worldwide for female representation in parliament. Aside from this, women represent only 11% of local government members, and not one mayor or governor nationally is a woman.

There have been 3 draft laws discussed in parliament on increasing female representation in the legislative body, but none have been passed. Though some intended to impose mandatory gender quotas, others did not.

One initiative by international NGOs offered proposed a mandatory rule that 50% of all party list candidates should be a woman in order to qualify that party to register with the Central Election Commission. Had this passed, there would have been at least 38 women among the 150 members of the parliament.

Another initiative by MPs from ruling the Georgian Dream party, including vice-speaker of parliament Manana Kobakhidze, offered a 30% in the available budget to every party with an at least 33% female candidate list in a way that there is at least one woman in every 3 person of the list. Ultimately, none of these received parliamentary backing, with arguments for and against varying between 'empowerment of women' and 'artificial intervention in the system'.

Nevertheless, at a meeting organized by the Women's Movement in April, parties shared their opinions about a gender quota system. Though most of the parties present admitted that they did not support mandatory quotas, they did express approval of women's increased participation in politics.

As it stands, parties and blocs running 3 women in every 10 candidates are eligible for an additional 30% state funding, should they enter parliament. The National Democratic Institute (NDI) found, however, that only 4 out of 25 parties and blocs running for office were qualified for this payment.

Polling by the NDI showed that as of 2014, 70% of Georgians believe that at least 30% of parliamentarians should be women. The same polls also show that 74% of Georgians believe women in elected office perform equally or better than men. That said, compared to the 2012 election, the percentage of women running as both majoritarian and proportional list candidates has only marginally increased.

Despite the failure of efforts to legislate for better representation of women in parliament, political parties are trying to emphasize female presence in their lists. This July, when Georgian Dream nominated new candidates for the upcoming election, 8 of them were women. However, the trend of increased female inclusion is stagnant, with only 18 women in Georgian Dream's 155-person electoral list party. At the top, things are even more stark: only 6 of the 20 highest spots on the list are filled by women.

In United National Movement, the main opposition party, the situation is marginally better, with 50 women on a 200-person electoral list, but, as with Georgian Dream, only 6 women among the top 20 candidates.

According to the NDI, of the majoritarian candidates nominated by Georgia's ten largest parties, only 17% are women. As for the list candidates of said parties, women represent only 37%.

Overall, however, women's political participation is growing. A number of prominent women candidates are running in 2016, with ex-first lady Sandra Roelofs' UNM candidacy in Zugdidi only the most prominent. Alongside her are Tamar Chugoshvili, ex-head of a prominent NGO, running for Georgian Dream's list, and Tina Khidasheli, an ex-defence minister and a Republican Party candidate. Though they remain exceptions, rather than rules, if present trends continue, full political gender parity is only a matter of time.

source: DatoParulava is a journalist with the newspaper and website liberali.ge. He contributed this article to commonspace.eu

photo: On 8 March, International Women's day, a demonstration in Tbilisi organised by an independent feminist group asked for "More Women in Parliament".

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)