French Armed Forces Minister calls Mali's accusations of being abandoned by France “indecent”

Tensions continue to rise between France and Mali. “Unacceptable” and “indecent” accusations, which amount to “wiping ones feet on the blood of French soldiers” is how the Minister of the Armed Forces, Florence Parly, qualified, on Monday (27 September), the remarks made by the Malian prime minister, Choguel Kokalla Maïga, against France, on Saturday, at the tribune of the United Nations.

Indeed, during his speech at the UN General Assembly, Maïga accused France of abandoning Mali with its decision to withdraw the Barkhane force. The prime minister claimed that because of France's move to reconfigure its presence in Mali, the country had to find new ways to ensure its safety with the help of other partners, justifying the recruitment of mercenaries from the Russian paramilitary company Wagner.

During a conference in front of students from the prestigious French university Sciences Po Paris, Florence Parly added that “there is no French disengagement, I want to start by re-establishing untruths [...] When we have 5,000 soldiers and we disengage from three rights-of-way, and we intend to leave several thousand more, when state-of-the-art armoured vehicles are deployed in the Sahel […] this is not the normal attitude of a country which intends to leave.”

“It’s a lot of hypocrisy, it’s a lot of bad faith, a lot of indecency, especially because it was said on Saturday 25 September. However, on Friday 24 September, a 52nd French soldier gave his life to fight terrorism in the Sahel,” Parly said indignantly. A French soldier deployed as part of the Barkhane force was killed on Friday in Mali.

According to Parly, recruiting mercenaries from Wagner would represent a way to avoid keeping the commitments made by Mali vis-à-vis the international community regarding the elections that are planned for February 2022. 

“I have the impression that the date” on which the Malian authorities - who came to power by a coup d'état in August 2020 - committed themselves “does not suit them perfectly, and that they want to prolong the thing. But from there to wiping your feet on the blood of French soldiers, it is unacceptable,” she said.

Choguel Maïga told Agence France-Presse on Sunday that the elections could be postponed for a few weeks or months. Following this statement, at the UN on Monday, Paris reiterated its call for legislative and presidential elections to take place on 27 February 2022 in Mali, in accordance with commitments made to the international community by the Malian junta currently in power.

Earlier on Tuesday, the spokesperson for the French foreign ministry said that “the transformation of [France's] military system in the Sahel is neither a departure from Mali, nor a unilateral decision, and it is wrong to say the opposite.” The adaptation of this device was the subject of “consultations with the Sahel and Malian authorities since the Pau summit in January 2020”.

The commander of the Barkhane force also refuted on Monday any lack of consultations and any abandonment. “The plan to leave Kidal, Tessalit and Timbuktu [...] was drawn up with the heads of state of the G5 zone” (which includes Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso and Chad), declared General Laurent Michon during a trip to Nouakchott, Mauritania, recalling that the peacekeepers of the UN Mission MINUSMA and the Malian army remained present in these three places.

 

source: commonspace.eu with Le Monde (Paris) and agencies.
photo: Florence Parly at the military base of Gao, Mali, on Tuesday (21 September); @florence_parly (Twitter).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Russia adds pressure on Armenia ahead of key elections; recalls Ambassador in Yerevan for consultations

Ahead of key parliamentary elections,scheduled to be held in Armenia on Sunday, 7 June, Russia continues to attempt to put pressure on the Armenian Government led by prime minister Nikol Pashinyan. On 30 May, Russia recalled its Ambassador to Yerevan for consultations. A terse statement, published on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry, said, "The Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Republic of Armenia , S.P. Kopyrkin, has been summoned to Moscow for consultations in connection with the steps taken by the Armenian leadership to move closer to the European Union, which are detrimental to cooperation within the EAEU." This followed a statement issued the day before, by the leaders of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) that challenges the Armenian trajectory towards approximating to the European Union. Vladimir Putin is undertood to have personally pushed the other four EAEU leaders to issue the statement, which said: "Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union."
Editor's choice
News
The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union.

The leaders of the states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEAS) issued a tough statement warning fellow-member state Armenia of the consequences of its desire to join the European Union. The stark, sharply worded,  warning, comes days before crucial parliamentary elections in Armenia, scheduled for 7 June. The full statement said, “We, the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation, Taking into account the actions of the Republic of Armenia aimed at joining the European Union, including the approval in 2025 by the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia and the signing by the President of the Republic of Armenia of the Law of the Republic of Armenia "On the Start of the Process of Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the European Union", as well as the confirmation by the European Union of the European aspirations of the Government of the Republic of Armenia, expressed in the joint declaration following the first Armenia-European Union summit, adopted on 5 May 2026, Taking into account the significant risks to the economic security of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (hereinafter referred to as the Union) arising in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia for accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent the associated damage to the member states of the Union: decided that the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council from the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Russian Federation will report at the next meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in December 2026 on the possible consequences of the suspension of the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union with respect to the Republic of Armenia. We share the position on the need to hold a national referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on joining the European Union or continuing to be part of the Eurasian Economic Union. Astana, May 29, 2026” A meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council was held in Astana, Kazakhstan, on May 29, 2026. The meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council in a restricted format was attended by Russian President Vladimir Putin, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko , Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev , Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov , Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan, and Chairman of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission Bakytzhan Sagintayev. From the Russian side, the meeting was also attended by Deputy Prime Minister and member of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission Alexey Overchuk and Presidential Aide Yury Ushakov . The heads of delegations from EAEU observer states, including President of Uzbekistan Shavkat Mirziyoyev , Vice President of Cuba Salvador Valdés Mesa, Minister of Industry, Mines, and Trade of Iran Mohammad Atabak, and CIS Secretary General Sergei Lebedev, joined the expanded meeting . Following the meeting of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council, a number of documents were signed .

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)