French Armed Forces Minister calls Mali's accusations of being abandoned by France “indecent”

Tensions continue to rise between France and Mali. “Unacceptable” and “indecent” accusations, which amount to “wiping ones feet on the blood of French soldiers” is how the Minister of the Armed Forces, Florence Parly, qualified, on Monday (27 September), the remarks made by the Malian prime minister, Choguel Kokalla Maïga, against France, on Saturday, at the tribune of the United Nations.

Indeed, during his speech at the UN General Assembly, Maïga accused France of abandoning Mali with its decision to withdraw the Barkhane force. The prime minister claimed that because of France's move to reconfigure its presence in Mali, the country had to find new ways to ensure its safety with the help of other partners, justifying the recruitment of mercenaries from the Russian paramilitary company Wagner.

During a conference in front of students from the prestigious French university Sciences Po Paris, Florence Parly added that “there is no French disengagement, I want to start by re-establishing untruths [...] When we have 5,000 soldiers and we disengage from three rights-of-way, and we intend to leave several thousand more, when state-of-the-art armoured vehicles are deployed in the Sahel […] this is not the normal attitude of a country which intends to leave.”

“It’s a lot of hypocrisy, it’s a lot of bad faith, a lot of indecency, especially because it was said on Saturday 25 September. However, on Friday 24 September, a 52nd French soldier gave his life to fight terrorism in the Sahel,” Parly said indignantly. A French soldier deployed as part of the Barkhane force was killed on Friday in Mali.

According to Parly, recruiting mercenaries from Wagner would represent a way to avoid keeping the commitments made by Mali vis-à-vis the international community regarding the elections that are planned for February 2022. 

“I have the impression that the date” on which the Malian authorities - who came to power by a coup d'état in August 2020 - committed themselves “does not suit them perfectly, and that they want to prolong the thing. But from there to wiping your feet on the blood of French soldiers, it is unacceptable,” she said.

Choguel Maïga told Agence France-Presse on Sunday that the elections could be postponed for a few weeks or months. Following this statement, at the UN on Monday, Paris reiterated its call for legislative and presidential elections to take place on 27 February 2022 in Mali, in accordance with commitments made to the international community by the Malian junta currently in power.

Earlier on Tuesday, the spokesperson for the French foreign ministry said that “the transformation of [France's] military system in the Sahel is neither a departure from Mali, nor a unilateral decision, and it is wrong to say the opposite.” The adaptation of this device was the subject of “consultations with the Sahel and Malian authorities since the Pau summit in January 2020”.

The commander of the Barkhane force also refuted on Monday any lack of consultations and any abandonment. “The plan to leave Kidal, Tessalit and Timbuktu [...] was drawn up with the heads of state of the G5 zone” (which includes Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso and Chad), declared General Laurent Michon during a trip to Nouakchott, Mauritania, recalling that the peacekeepers of the UN Mission MINUSMA and the Malian army remained present in these three places.

 

source: commonspace.eu with Le Monde (Paris) and agencies.
photo: Florence Parly at the military base of Gao, Mali, on Tuesday (21 September); @florence_parly (Twitter).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)