EU reiterates its support for peaceful resolution of the Karabakh Conflict

The EU delegate to the OSCE Permanent Council in Vienna on Thursday reiterated the committment of the EU to contribute towards a peaceful solution of the conflict through support for the Minsk Group, the work of the EUSR for the South Caucasus and initiatives such as EPNK.

The EU delegate was speaking at a meeting of the Permanent Council of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), which took place in Vienna on Thursday, 9 November. The Permanent Council heard reports from the co-Chair of the OSCE Minsk Process, the Special Representative of the OSCE Chairmanship and the Head of the High Level Military Planning Group dealing with the conflict.

In its statement to the Permanent Council the European Union reiterated its support for the Minsk Group and declared its full trust to the co-chairs in their work to advance the search for a political, equitable and sustainable solution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, essential for the future of the region.

It added:

"We invite parties to take better advantage of the efforts deployed by the co-chairs. The European Union is following closely developments in the Karabagh region, which remains highly volatile. The past year has again seen far too many victims and there are almost daily violations of the cease-fire. Cases of heavy artillery use or targeting of the civilian population are of particular concern. We reiterate our condemnation of all use of force and call on the parties to avoid any action likely to fuel tensions. To this end, We call on the parties to strictly respect the ceasefire, in accordance with their commitments.

In general, the parties must observe restraint, both in the field and in their public statements.

The European Union welcomes the resumption of contacts at the highest level with the holding of a presidential summit on 16 October in Geneva. We consider very important, the agreement between the Armenian and Azerbaijanis on an intensification of the negotiation process, including at the ministerial level, as well as new measures to reduce incidents along the line of contact.

We continue to support the implementation of the confidence-building measures approved in 2016 at the Vienna and St. Petersburg Summits, including the expansion of the office of the Personal Representative, the humanitarian measure on exchange of data on the disappeared from the conflict under the auspices of the ICRC, and further discussions on the establishment of a mechanism investigation of incidents.

The European Union reiterates its commitment to a peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh, on the basis of the fundamental principles of the Charter of the United Nations and the Helsinki Final Act. It recognizes the unsustainable and dangerous nature of the status quo and calls for the development of a comprehensive peace treaty. The European Union remains mobilized, through his Special Representative in particular, to provide support to conflict resolution efforts. It is engaged as part of its program for facilitating contact between societies divided by conflict - The European Partnership for the Peaceful Settlement of the Conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh (EPNK). It remains available for setting up other confidence-building measures in support and full complementarity of the Minsk Group.

The European Union wishes to thank on this occasion Ambassador Herbert Salber for the work done as Special Representative in the last three years and wishes a full success to his successor, Toivo Klaar.

Mr President, We wish to share our positive appreciation for the work done, sometimes in difficult security conditions, by the Representative of the Chairman-in-Office Ambassador Kasprzyk, and his team. The European Union attaches the utmost importance to the unimpeded pursuit of its ceasefire monitoring activities on the LOC and along the border between Armenia and Azerbaijan. We thank Ambassador Kasprzyk for providing other examples of the activities carried out by the Office, such as in the humanitarian sphere. All of these activities unquestionably contribute to reduce tensions in the region and are a valuable instrument for the implementation of confidence-building measures on the ground. The office of Personal Representative represents, since the closure of the mission to Yerevan, the only OSCE presence in the region. We encourage the good faith implementation of the decision to extend the Office of the Personal Representative, which should include: intensification of observation missions. This would be an important step for build trust between the parties and advance the process of conflict resolution.

Mr President, The European Union also reiterates its full support for the activities of the planning for the deployment of a peacekeeping mission conducted by the HLPG under the guidanceof Colonel Lampalzer. The deployment of a mission, however, will depend on the parties' on the basis of the principles identified for a peaceful settlement of the conflict under the auspices of the Minsk Group. We support the measures taken to improve the planning capabilities of the HLPG, such as participation of HLPG members in the monitoring exercises of the Personal Representative, the OSCE Global Approach (the "whole-of-OSCE" approach ") and continuing contacts with other international organizations working in the field of peacekeeping. The organization of a reconnaissance visit to the field, which was not possible for years, would be useful in this regard.

In conclusion, the European Union renews its full support to the Co-Presidents of the Minsk Group, Ambassador Kasprzyk, as well as the HLPG. These processes form essential components of the architecture for the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The European Union also reiterates its determination to work closely with the Parties in promoting stability and prosperity, and the consolidation of democracy and the rule of law in the region, and to strenghten its relations with the region particularly in the framework of the Eastern Partnership.

The full text of the statement is available in the original French version here

source: commonspace.eu with the press service of the Mission of the European Union to international organisations in Vienna.

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)