Baku reacts to Pashinyan’s speech in Nagorno-Karabakh

The Azerbaijani Ministry of Foreign Affairs yesterday (6 August) issued a statement in response to a speech made by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on Monday (5 August) in Stepanakert. The MFA’s statement accuses the Prime Minister’s “aggressive statements” of “clearly [contradicting] the spirit and the essence of the negotiations on the settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh conflict conducted for many years, including the recent discussions of the meetings between Armenia and Azerbaijan”.

The statement referred to the speech as a “major blow to the negotiation process mediated by the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs,” and that the Prime Minister’s remarks do not correspond to Armenia’s appeal for an “exclusive peaceful settlement of the conflict”.

The MFA’s statement also addressed the 2050 Armenian development goals, which Pashinyan declared during Monday’s speech, saying that the country will not be able to “achieve its ambitions for the next 30 years hiding behind its aggressive policy”. It accused the Armenian leadership of using the goals to deceive the Armenian people, advocating that Armenia “[evaluate] the current situation and [normalise] its relations with neighboring countries”.

The Armenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has responded to the statement by the Azerbaijani MFA, criticising it as “a stark demonstration of failure to adhere to basic rules of civility and decency, incapacity to sustain civilized norms of conduct between nations, especially amongst parties engaged at the highest level in highly complex and sensitive process of conflict resolution.” The retaliatory statement accused the Azerbaijani MFA of “personal attacks” and a “culture of intolerance and hatred towards the Armenian people”.

The Armenian MFA also accused the Azerbaijanis of failing to “understand the context and content” of the speech, defending Pashinyan’s rhetoric as addressing “the pan-Armenian agenda of advancing unity, solidarity, development and prosperity for Armenia, Artsakh and Diaspora”. It defended Armenia as the only ‘guarantor’ for those in Nagorno-Karabakh, condemning Azerbaijan’s unwillingness to involve the de facto leaders of the region in negotiations. It reaffirmed Armenia’s continued commitment to a “strictly peaceful resolution of the conflict” but that any solution “should be acceptable to the peoples of Artsakh, Armenia and Azerbaijan”.

The Head of Foreign Policy Affairs Department of the Azerbaijani Presidential Administration, Hikmet Hajiyev, weighed in yesterday by saying, “By making this destructive and provocative statement, the Armenian side again puts the region face to face with threats and risks, and intentionally escalates the situation to divert public attention from its domestic issues”. Hajiyev accused Pashinyan of contradicting his “recent statements that he 'cannot speak on behalf of Nagorno-Karabakh',” and of misleading the international community In the negotiations.

Observers are concerned that the spat may undermine the feasibility of Pashinyan’s new government to make headway on the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process, and that it may increase the likelihood of ‘war by accident’, with Azerbaijan abandoning faith in a peaceful settlement to the conflict.

Sources: commonspace.eu and agencies
Photo: 
Azerbaijani MFA (picture courtesy of Azertag website)

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.