Armenian leaders, past and present, warn about new dangers of more conflict in Karabakh

Armenian leaders past and present, on Wednesday (20 November) spoke about the dangers of a new Karabakh conflict whilst addressing separate European audiences.

Armenia's former president, Serzh Sargsyan, addressed the issue whilst speaking at the conference of the European People's Party in the Croatian Capital, Zagreb where he was attending in his capacity as the leader of Armenia's former ruling party the Republican Party of Armenia. On the other side of the Adriatic Sea, in Milan, Italy, Armenia's current leader, Nikol Pashinyan was addressing an audience at Milan's Italian Institute for International Political Studies, on the first day of his official visit to Italy.

Serzh Sargsyan's speech in Zagreb was one of the first since relinquishing power in dramatic circumstances in May 2018 following street protests. Sargsyan used his speech to voice his frustration at the policies of the current Armenian government. But he also made reference to the Karabakh conflict, expressing concerns about the current stage of the negotiations for conflict settlement.

"As someone who participated in the liberation of Artsakh in person, I am well aware of the price for peace. From this perspective any negotiation, however inadequate, is preferred to war," he said. "It is very important for the mediation efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-chairs to continue to receive unconditional assistance by the international community. Unfortunately, we see that Azerbaijan continues to arm itself and threaten Artsakh and Armenia. I want to reiterate my message for those in Baku to hear: Artsakh will never be a constituent part of Azerbaijan, and the issue has no military solution", Serzh Sargsyan said.

In Milan, the current Armenian leader, Nikol Pashinyan, gave one of the longest and most comprehensive overseas speeches since coming to power, during which he covered a number of domestic and foreign policy issues. A big chunk of Pashinyan's speech was dedicated to the Karabakh conflict, with the Armenian leader reiterating his mantra that a solution to the Karabakh conflict can only be achieved if it is supported by Armenia, Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh, whilst inviting the Azerbaijani leadership to express such a position.  "I have told Ilham Aliyev that I am the first Armenian leader to announce that any solution to Nagorno Karabakh conflict should be acceptable for the peoples of Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan. I suggest that Azerbaijani president should also make a similar announcement, since it's the main concept and platform for regional stability and peace", Pashinyan said. He added:

"Nagorno-Karabakh is a very difficult and painful issue for the peoples of the region. It cannot be resolved without hard and consistent efforts, without compromise, mutual respect and balance. But if we have taken responsibility for the future of our peoples, then we must make efforts to achieve real change. I mean the Government of Azerbaijan, the Government of Nagorno Karabakh and the Government of Armenia. We are sincere in our pursuit of peace in the region and are ready for a dialogue for the sake of a solution acceptable to the peoples of Armenia, Nagorno Karabakh and Azerbaijan. This is our approach, and we are ready to negotiate on the basis of this new paradigm."

Pashinyan's speech also expressed concerns about the current state of affairs, accusing Baku of preparing the population for war.

In a somewhat bizarre twist, the Armenian prime minister also warned his Italian audience that in case of a resumption of hostilities in Nagorno-Karabakh Azerbaijan can become a springboard for jihadists escaping from Syria to attack Europe.

Commonspace.,eu political editor said in a comment that "the fact that Sargsyan and Pashinyan both made major speeches in Europe on the same day is probably a coincidence. They both appear to be sounding the alarm bells about a possible new conflict in Karabakh, and this despite the fact that the situation in the conflict region has this year been reasonably calm and quiet. However both speeches need to be read also within the context of domestic Armenian politics, with reports of increasing discontent with the current government and with attempts by anti-Pashinyan forces to use the Karabakh issue as a rallying point. But whilst an Armenian audience is used to the rhetoric used by both Sargsyan and Pashinyan it is likely that the international audiences to who the speeches were addressed will be somewhat puzzled by it. And in Baku the speeches are likely to be met with disdain, and more rhetoric. It is very doubtful if any of this is helpful to a Karabakh conflict settlement."

source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Nikol Pashinyan addressing an audience in Milan on 20 November 2019 (picture courtesy of the press service of the prime minister of Armenia)

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
News
G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

G7 foreign ministers issue wide ranging statement after their meeting in Canada

The Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the High Representative of the European Union, met under Canada’s G7 Presidency, in Niagara, on November 11-12, 2025. The Foreign Ministers of Brazil, India, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, South Africa, and Ukraine, also joined the meeting for discussions on maritime security and prosperity, critical minerals, economic resilience and energy security. At the end of their meeting the G7 foreign ministers said: We reaffirmed our unwavering support for Ukraine in defending its territorial integrity and right to exist, and its freedom, sovereignty, and independence. We reiterated that an immediate ceasefire is urgently needed. We agreed that the current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. We are increasing the economic costs to Russia, and exploring measures against countries and entities that are helping finance Russia’s war efforts. We condemned the provision to Russia of military assistance by DPRK and Iran, and the provision of weapons and dual-use components by China, a decisive enabler of Russia’s war. We acknowledged the ongoing discussions on a wide range of financing options, including further leveraging immobilised Russian Sovereign Assets in our jurisdictions in a coordinated way to support Ukraine. We strongly condemned Russia’s recent direct attacks on energy infrastructure and reaffirmed our support for Ukraine’s energy security. We reiterated our strong support for President Trump’s Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict. We welcomed the ceasefire and the release of hostages. We stressed the urgency of returning the remains of deceased hostages. We also welcomed the increased flows of aid, but expressed concern about restrictions that remain in place. We called on all parties to allow for humanitarian assistance without interference at scale, through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in addition to other international institutions and INGOs, as stipulated in President Trump’s plan. It is vital that all parties continue to engage constructively on the next steps outlined in the Comprehensive Plan, in pursuit of a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous co-existence for the Israeli and Palestinian peoples that advances comprehensive Middle East peace and stability. We will also continue to maintain attention on the situation in the West Bank. (click headline to read more)