Armenian authorities move against opposition leader Gagik Tsarukyan

The Armenian authorities have moved against the leader of the largest opposition party in parliament, Gagik Tsarukyan, searching his house on Sunday morning, and questioning him for eight hours at the offices of the National Security Service. The leader of the Prosperous Armenia Party(PAP) is one of the country's most colourful politicians, and also one of its richest citizens - an oligarch with varied business interests who has so far been considered as untouchable. PAP has 26 members in the country's 132 seat legislature.

On Sunday, Tsarukyan's supporters gathered, first near his house and later at the offices of the National Security Service to protest against his detention. Dozens of people were arrested during some tense confrontations with police. Opposition leaders accused the police of excessive use of force, although there were no reports of anyone being hospitalised.

The National Security Service issued a number of statements explaining what cases where being investigated. They include financial irregularities at Casino Shangri La owned by Gagik Tsarukyan. According to the NSS statement, it operated without a license, which resulted in the loss of billions of Armenian Drams in damage to the state budget.

The case is related to vote buying during the 2017 parliamentary election.

A third case involves illegal transfer of land in Kotayk district.

Tsarukyan has said that the authorities have moved against him after he called for resignations from government for their failure to deal properly with the coronavirus pandemic. The government has insisted that no one is above the law.

As a member of parliament Gagik Tsarukyan has parliamentary immunity. PAP politicians on Monday said they expected the government to address the parliament to lift this immunity.

In a carefully worded statement, Armenia's second largest parliamentary opposition party - Bright Armenia on Monday called on the authorities to desist from selective justice and blackmail. The statement said:

"The Bright Armenia party reaffirms that those who have committed crimes should be prosecuted and sentenced in accordance with the RA legislation.

At the same time, by adhering to the values ​​of the rule of law and the rule of law, we condemn the political influence and control over any criminal prosecution. Anyone who violates the law should be held accountable with the full force of the law, but the use of legal proceedings, as well as the use of blackmail and compromising information as a political tool to silence, suppress and suppress opponents, is unacceptable and reprehensible. Political influence over law enforcement destroys the legitimacy of criminal prosecution.

Along with the above-mentioned processes, the representatives of the political authorities, including the deputies and the ministers, were spreading evidence on social networks that apparently contained confidential information from the preliminary investigation.

Moreover, the above-mentioned officials made statements with a clear violation of the presumption of innocence.

It is noteworthy that criminal cases are initiated on different cases during the same day and the same person is summoned for questioning in the same cases.

The above clearly shows that criminal prosecution takes place under political intervention and control. This already proves the obvious lack of honesty of the ruling political force in the implementation of state policy and being guided by double standards, which is manifested in compromising policy and selective application of the law. The Bright Armenia Party strongly condemns the criminal prosecution and the selective application of the law on the basis of political expediency.

We call on the authorities to fight the epidemic and manage the difficult socio-economic situation, leaving the criminal prosecution only to the law enforcement agencies."

source; commonspace.eu with agencies.

photo: Gagik Tsarukyan (archive picture)

 

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.