Ann Linde, the Swedish foreign minister, outlines her country’s priorities for its 2021 OSCE chairpersonship

Ann Linde, the Swedish foreign minister, has today (14 January) outlined Sweden’s priorities during its chairpersonship of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) this year. Speaking virtually to the OSCE’s Permanent Council, Linde – who is also the OSCE’s Chairperson-in-Office during Sweden’s chairpersonship – said that her country will do its part to ensure that the OSCE can make a real difference on the ground and defend the principles on which the organisation was founded.

“In a situation where multilateral co-operation and international law are increasingly being challenged, and our agreements and instruments to strengthen security are being questioned, we need to remind ourselves why we designed them in the first place,” said Linde. “Sweden is convinced that multilateral co-operation is the best way to address our common challenges. Sweden has shown that we are ready to shoulder our responsibility for the multilateral system.”

The OSCE was established on the principles of the Helsinki Final Act (HFA), signed in 1975 by 35 countries in the northern hemisphere – from across Europe, North America and what was then the Soviet Union. The HFA is considered to be the first time that these countries acknowledged the importance of a holistic approach to security, that included respect for human rights – amongst other things – as an indivisible principle of security. In her statement today, Linde re-emphasised that within these shared principles of the OSCE, “the link between security and respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law is crystal clear”.

“By holding each other accountable, we make sure that our commitments remain relevant. By honouring our commitments, we make sure that our region is safe. This is where the unique value of our organisation lies”, she added.

Linde also emphasised that conflict resolution efforts in Europe’s neighbourhood are a high priority, noting the ongoing conflicts and crises in and around Nagorno-Karabakh, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia and Belarus. She also highlighted the importance of women’s empowerment for comprehensive security – something she confirmed would be another focus of the Swedish chairpersonship.

She stressed that the OSCE “is only as effective as we, the participating States, allow it to be”, urging constructive engagement on the OSCE Unified Budget. She emphasised that Sweden, in its position as chair, stands “ready to do [its] part in leading negotiations”.

The full programme of Sweden's 2021 chairpersonship of the OSCE can be found here.

Last year, the OSCE found itself in crisis, without leadership for nearly half a year, after its member states failed to come to consensus on extending the mandates of its four main leadership positions. In December the host of commonspace.eu’s Global Europe Unpacked podcast, William Murray, spoke to Dr Walter Kemp – who has held a number of senior positions in the OSCE – about, amongst other things, Sweden's chairmanship, the OSCE 2020 leadership crisis, the organisation’s principles, and what can be done to ensure that it remains relevent going forward. You can listen to the episode here as well as on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and wherever else you get your podcasts.  

 

Source: commonspace.eu with agencies
Photo: OSCE Chairperson-in-Office Ann Linde makes her statement to the OSCE Permanent Council

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.