TURKEY'S CRISIS MOMENT PASSES

Turkey's Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, yesterday chaired a three hour meeting of his security team to discuss an escalating security situation in the country's Kurdish populated regions. The meeting took place only hours after the country's Supreme Military Council, which the Prime Minister also chairs, filled the vacancies created last week with the resignation of the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces, and the heads of the Army, Navy and Air Force.

The resignations came at the end of a period of stand-off between the military and the civilian government headed by Erdogan. Emboldened by his recent re-election victory Erdogan had refused the recommendations of the senior military command to promote officers who were implicated in planning a coup against the civilian government in 2003, and in later attempts to undermine the AK Party administration. Forty one Generals or former Generals, and many other senior officers,  are at the moment behind bars in connection with investigations around these plots.

Whilst some in Turkey saw the resignations as a serious moment of crisis, Erdogan used the situation to assert, probably for the first time since Ataturk, the control of the civilian government over the Armed Forces. The government used the scheduled meeting of the Supreme Military Council to quickly fill the vacancies, and to proceed with further promotions in the military which even government critics admit showed that the "established rules of succession were not profoundly shaken". Thus whilst standing firm, Erdogan has also been able to defuse the crisis and to ensure the support of the military in the face of an increasing security threat in the country's southeast.

There have been several serious incidents in the predominantly Kurdish poplulated regions since the Parliamentary elections in June. A number of independent MPs elected in the Kurdish areas have been denied their parliamentary mandates, and some have been jailed, for supporting the PKK, considered by the Turkish government as a terrorist organisation. There have been a number of serious PKK attacks since, which have left many Turkish soldiers dead or wounded.

Turkey is playing an increasingly important role as a regional power in the Middle East and the in Caucasus. Erdogan's victory is likely to help consolidate  the government's position of zero problems with neighbours and increasing use of Turkish "soft power" in projecting Turkish influence in the region. Erdogan however faces a number of immediate challenges in this regard also, including an ongoing crisis in Syria and a failure to unblock problems with Armenia.

This week's standoff with the military also overshadowed problems in the economic sphere which on Wednesday saw the Turkish Central Bank intervening to protect the Turkish lira in the face of ongoing global economic problems  and a widening gap in the Turkish current account balances.


prepared by the newsroom of commonspace.eu

photo: Prime Minister Erdogan chairing a meeting of his security team in Ankara yesterday (4 August 2011) Photo courtesy of the Press Office of the Prime Minister of Turkey

(c) commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Landmines present to the European Union both a contradiction and a dilemma

Finland’s decision to buy one million landmines creates a serious contradiction in the policy of the European Union, and is symbolic of a bigger dilemma facing European countries as they get used to the need to acquire “hard” power to face an increasing threat from Russia. Finland is seeking to acquire one million anti-personnel mines at a cost of 100 million euros. Finland, together with Poland, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia last year abandoned the Ottawa agreement, the international framework that bans the use of anti-personnel mines, which the EU had been instrumental in establishing and supporting. All five countries cite the threat from Moscow as the reason. Colonel Riku Mikkonen of the Army Command told Finland’s national news agency STT that officials are now gathering information from suppliers regarding the deal, the AFP news agency reports. Helsinki would like domestic manufacturers to supply the mines, with contracts signed by the end of 2027 and production up and running by 2028. “It would be useful in many ways if Finnish companies produced the anti-personnel mines in Finland,” Mikkonen said. About half a dozen Finnish firms qualify, he told STT. “However, at this stage, buying the mines from abroad is not totally ruled out,” he added. LANDMINES PROVIDE THE EU WITH BOTH A CONTRADICTION, AND A DILEMMA Eliminating landmine contamination worldwide is one of the EU’s main soft power postures, and it basks in its record as the biggest funder of anti-landmine action in the world. But the fact that 5 of its 27 member states  have now left the Ottawa Treaty dents the EU moral high ground. It is a contradiction that is too big and important to be ignored. It also presents the European Union with a deeper dilemma. The threat from Russia is changing what the EU has stood for decades, namely a force for good able to mobilise its considerable soft power for the greater good of humanity. How the Union will implement this change will define its future. In the meantime landmines have not become any less lethal, benign, or unimportant. They remain in many parts of the world a major threat to life, an impediment to prosperity, and a potential trigger to further conflict. The 22 EU members states that still adhere to the Ottawa treaty must regroup, and be more assertive in their quest against anti-personnel land mines. All the reasons why they supported the Ottawa treaty in the first place still exist. The message must be clear: NO TO LANDMINES!
Editor's choice
News
Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Pashinyan says that he wants peace treaty with Azerbaijan by 2031

Armenia should sign and ratify a peace treaty with Azerbaijan before 2031, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. He described the objective as the top priority for his administration. Earlier, the Armenian prime minister also spoke about a possible land-swap with Azerbaijan Armenia and Azerbaijan should agree to establish a clear, conventional border without enclaves or exclaves, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said. Armenia controls three Azeri enclaves inside its borders while Baku controls one Armenian enclave – those could be subject to a land swap, Pashinyan announced.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)