A timely correction of a misperception. The EU is deeply involved in conflict resolution in the South Caucasus but is shy to talk about it.

There was a wonderful moment at an event in Brussels on Monday, on the margins of the meeting of the Foreign Ministers of the European Union and the Eastern Partnership countries. The Foreign Ministers of Lithuania, (which currently holds the Presidency of the EU), Georgia and Moldova were speaking at an event organised by the European Policy Centre on progress towards the forthcoming Vilnius Summit in November. Faced with a question from the audience Lithuanian Foreign Minister Linias Linkevicius said that the European Union was not directly involved in conflict resolution processes in the South Caucasus, and could only contribute by its moral support. Promptly, the soft-spoken Georgian Foreign Minister Maia Panjikidze shyly intervened to correct Linkevicius and to remind him that the EU is deeply involved in conflict resolution in the South Caucasus. It is in fact the co-Chair of the Geneva Process dealing with the conflicts in Georgia. She was of course right.

The misperception that somehow the European Union is aloof from the process of conflict resolution in the South Caucasus is widely held in Brussels and elsewhere, and Linkevicius was simply reflecting it. Its origin is the absence of the EU from the OSCE Minsk Process that is dealing with the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh. It is the only forum where the EU is not present, and since that particular forum is not going anywhere very fast, it does not seem that the EU is missing much.

Conflict resolution in the South Caucasus is a much bigger and wider challenge than anything currently being dealt with by the OSCE Minsk Process. The EU is as deeply involved in the process to resolve the conflicts in Georgia as could be. The resolution of the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh requires a much more comprehensive approach than what is being considered by the Minsk Process, although that element is also important and essential.

Now with the three countries of the South Caucasus engaged in different ways in developing their relations with the EU institutionally and through bilateral agreements the EU has become by default a key player in all the issues that affect the three countries. The absence of the European Union from the Minsk Process is the exception not the rule - an exception that becomes increasingly an anachronism - neither understandable nor acceptable. If conflict erupts in the region again, as it did in Georgia in 2008 the EU will have even less luxury to be detached than it did in that situation and everybody will be looking for its leadership and its contribution - not least in the capitals of the twenty-eight member states.

It is clear that there is now a need for the EU institutions to up their game with regards to how they manage their involvement with the conflicts in the Caucasus region but first they should stop denying the reality. The EU is deeply involved in conflict resolution in the South Caucasus and should not be shy to say it.

This is an editorial comment by Commonspace.eu.

photo: The Foreign Ministers of Lithuania, Moldova and Georgia speaking in Brussels on 22 July 2013 (picture courtesy of the European Policy Centre).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Situation in South Yemen strains relations between Saudi Arabia and UAE

Situation in South Yemen strains relations between Saudi Arabia and UAE

The relations between Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) are increasingly strained as a result of the different approach of the two countries towards Yemen. Whilst both countries were initially together in resisting the Houthi take over in Yemen, the UAE subsequently focused on the South of the country, backing the Southern Movement (STC), which seeks to restore the independence of South Yemen. South Yemen became an independent country in 1967, at the end of British rule, and only unified with the north in 1990. The Saudi-led “Coalition to Support Legitimacy in Yemen” on Tuesday, 30 December, said it conducted a “limited” airstrike targeting two ships “that smuggled weapons and other military hardware into Mukalla in southern Yemen”. The ships originated in the UAE port of Furjeirah. In a statement carried by the Saudi Press Agency (SPA), the Coalition Forces spokesman, Major General Turki Al-Maliki, said that two ships coming from the port of Fujairah in the United Arab Emirates entered the Port of Mukalla in Hadramaut without obtaining official permits from the Joint Forces Command of the Coalition. He stressed the Coalition's "continued commitment to de-escalation and enforcing calm in the governorates of Hadramawt and Al-Mahra, and to prevent any military support from any country to any Yemeni faction without coordination with the legitimate Yemeni government and the Coalition. The Southern Transitional Council (STC), launched a sweeping military campaign early in December, seizing the governorates of Hadramaut along the Saudi border and the eastern governorate of Al-Mahra in Yemen’s border with Oman. The UAE-backed STC forces captured the city of Seiyun, including its international airport and the presidential palace. They also took control of the strategic PetroMasila oilfields, which account for a massive portion of Yemen’s remaining oil wealth. (click the image to read the article in full).

Popular