PLAN B: IS FORCE A SOLUTION FOR RESOLVING THE KARABAKH CONFLICT?

IS FORCE A SOLUTION FOR RESOLVING THE KARABAKH CONFLICT?

Two developments in the last few days left an air of uncertainty and discomfort in international quarters. First in Kazan on Friday,24 June, the long heralded summit between the presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan with the president of Russia failed to achieve a breakthrough in the negotiations. The sides blamed each other, the international community expressed disappointment , and the OSCE co-Chair prepared for another round of shuttle diplomacy.

Two days later, Baku saw the biggest military parade in the history of independent Azerbaijan. Elements of the Army, Navy and Air force displayed some of the hardware that has been bought at great expense in recent years. Baku has been on a military shopping spree, with the military budget this year exceeding  USD 1.2 billion. On paper, the Armenian Military budget is more modest. But given the opaqueness in the arrangements between the Armenian Armed forces and the Russian forces based in Armenia, the Armenian figures may not be telling the whole story. Both sides talk peace most of the time, and they talk war sometimes.

Some experts have taken to drawing up doomsday scenarios - an Azerbaijani lightning strike to liberate its territories, or an Armenian pre-emptive strike to neutralise any Azerbaijani threat. Both scenarios are of course possible and the rhetoric coming out from Baku and Yerevan fuels this speculation.

Both scenarios however, in the unlikely event that they will happen will not lead to a solution.

A renewed conflict is likely to be long and messy, and will result in turning the problem into a new format but not a solution. Luckily Armenia and Azerbaijan are ruled by calm people who calculate well before any move.  That is why they have up to now opted for negotiations.

But the failure to achieve even modest progress in the negotiations is putting a lot of stress on the fragile cease fire on the line of contact where thousands of soldiers from both sides face each other in World War 1 trench conditions. Both sides report daily breaches of the cease fire, and claim casualties.

Strengthening the cease fire and strengthening the international monitoring of its compliance has now become a priority to give the negotiations more time. However the cease fire must not become an end in itself.

Patience is a virtue in conflict resolution, but senseless procrastination is not. The doomsday scenarios cannot be postponed for ever.

Prepared by commonspace.eu editorial team

Photo: Military parade in Baku on 26 June 2011

(photo courtesy of news.az)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
 UN General Assembly vote highlights Israel's isolation

UN General Assembly vote highlights Israel's isolation

Applause rang out in the UN General Assembly Hall on Friday as countries endorsed a declaration on the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and implementation of the two-State solution with Israel.  The New York Declaration is the outcome of an international conference held in July at UN Headquarters, organized by France and Saudi Arabia, which resumes later this month. The General Assembly comprises all 193 UN Member States and 142 countries voted in favour of a resolution backing the document. Israel voted against it, alongside nine other countries – Argentina, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Tonga and the United States – while 12 nations abstained. The vote highlights the current Israeli international isolation as a result of its current policies. Prior to the vote, French Ambassador Jérôme Bonnafont recalled that the New York Declaration “lays out a single roadmap to deliver the two-State solution”. This involves an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, release of all hostages held there, and the establishment of a Palestinian State that is both viable and sovereign. The roadmap further calls for the disarmament of Hamas and its exclusion from governance in Gaza, normalization between Israel and the Arab countries, as well as collective security guarantees.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
 UN General Assembly vote highlights Israel's isolation

UN General Assembly vote highlights Israel's isolation

Applause rang out in the UN General Assembly Hall on Friday as countries endorsed a declaration on the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and implementation of the two-State solution with Israel.  The New York Declaration is the outcome of an international conference held in July at UN Headquarters, organized by France and Saudi Arabia, which resumes later this month. The General Assembly comprises all 193 UN Member States and 142 countries voted in favour of a resolution backing the document. Israel voted against it, alongside nine other countries – Argentina, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Tonga and the United States – while 12 nations abstained. The vote highlights the current Israeli international isolation as a result of its current policies. Prior to the vote, French Ambassador Jérôme Bonnafont recalled that the New York Declaration “lays out a single roadmap to deliver the two-State solution”. This involves an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, release of all hostages held there, and the establishment of a Palestinian State that is both viable and sovereign. The roadmap further calls for the disarmament of Hamas and its exclusion from governance in Gaza, normalization between Israel and the Arab countries, as well as collective security guarantees.