Opinion: Special but not quite strategic

Benyamin Poghosyan discusses the relationship between Armenia and Georgia and argues that despite the close relations, and the efforts of the leaders, it is not yet strategic.

Two key topics concerning Georgia dominated the attention of the international media and expert community interested in the South Caucasus in past week. One was the outbreak of the novel Coronavirus and the growing number of cases identified in Georgia; the second issue was connected with domestic politics. After months of negotiations facilitated by the US and EU diplomats, the ruling Georgian Dream party and the united opposition reached an agreement to amend the electoral code before the crucial October 2020 Parliamentary elections, agreeing to significantly reduce the number of the majoritarian constituencies, and the threshold required for parties to enter the Parliament. The agreement stipulates that 120 seats in the legislative body will be distributed via a proportional vote and the remaining 30 via the majoritarian system. It also foresees a fair delineation of boundaries of election districts, a 1% threshold, and a cap recognizing that no single party that wins less than 40% of the votes should be able to form a government.

However, from regional perspective the key event of the past week was the official visit of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to Georgia on March 3 - 4. It should be noted that Pashinyan emphasized the significance of relations with Georgia from the very beginning of his tenure in office. Just 22 days after becoming Prime Minister in May 2018 Pashinyan paid a visit to Georgia and met with than Georgian Prime Minister Georgi Kvirikashvili. After the latter was dismissed in June 2018 Pashinyan made efforts to cultivate personal chemistry with next Prime Minister Mamuka Bakhtadze receiving him in September 2018 in Yerevan and holding two unofficial meetings in January 2019 in Bolnisi, Georgia and in March 2019 in Yenokavan, Armenia. After yet another government reshuffle in Georgia in September 2019, the new Prime Minister Giorgi Gakharia visited Yerevan on October 15, 2019 where both leaders reaffirmed the mutual interest in developing economic ties, protecting cultural heritage and promoting peace and stability in the region. According to Georgian official data the Armenia - Georgia trade turnover was 614 million USD in 2018 and 679.9 million USD in 2019 showing more than 10 percent increase.

During the March 3-4, 2020 official visit Pashinyan met with Prime Minister Gakharia, President Zurabishvili, Parliament Speaker Talakvadze and Catholicos Patriarch of all Georgia, His Holiness Ilia II. During these meetings the strategic significance of development of Armenia - Georgia relations were emphasized and Pashinyan stated that the new factor and major cornerstone in strengthening the Armenian-Georgian relations was the shared commitment to democratic values. During the visit a memorandum was signed according to which citizens will have the opportunity to cross the Georgian and Armenian borders with their ID cards.

However, despite all the positive rhetoric of official speeches during high level meetings, the bilateral relations between states are often assessed and measured by the convergence/divergence of their strategic interests, and the implementation of the strategic cooperation projects. In this context Georgia is significant for Armenia as the main transit route towards the outside world and as an important member of the Iran - Armenia - Georgia - Russia North - South electricity corridor, the establishment of which was envisaged in the Road map signed by the representatives of all four countries in April 2016 in Yerevan.

The Road map envisaged putting in operation the Armenia-Georgia 400/500 kV power transmission lines and powering substation by the end of 2018/beginning of 2019. If implemented, the exchange of electric/energy power between two countries could reach up to 350 MW in the first phase and reaching up to 700MW in 2021. However, despite the agreements with KfW German development bank for the funding of the project, as of March 2020 the construction of power transmission lines and powering substation has not started yet, thus endangering the implementation of this strategically important project for Armenia.

Even more, if in mid 2000s 10-15 percent of electricity consumed in Georgia was imported from Armenia, in 2019 Armenian export of electricity to Georgia fell to zero. Given the export oriented structure of Armenian energy infrastructure, the factual lost of the Georgian market is a significant blow to the Armenian energy security. Meanwhile, Azerbaijan has significantly increased its electricity export to Georgia becoming the number one electricity exporter in 2019.

Another significant development in Armenia - Georgia relations could be the agreement on purchase, or the long term lease, of any Georgian Black sea ports' terminal to exclusively serve the import - export operations from and to Armenia. However, to be able to secure the necessary international investments for such an endeavor Armenia needs a Georgian agreement to grant customs privileges for goods exported from or imported to Armenia. However, albeit some initial discussions there are no concrete achievements in this direction.

Thus, we may conclude that despite some recent positive developments in Armenia - Georgia relations including the increase of bilateral trade volume and the intensified dialogue at the leaders' level, no strategically significant achievements have been made since May 2018. The two sides should put more efforts in obtaining tangible results especially in the energy and transport spheres.   

source: Benyamin Poghosyan is the Founder and Chairman of the Center for Political and Economic Strategic Studies in Yerevan.

 

photo:  Armenian prime minister Nikol Pashinyan being welcomed in Georgia by prime minister Gaharia on 4 March 2020 (picture courtesy of the press service of the government of Armenia)

 

The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.
Editor's choice
News
Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Donald Tusk: "One for all, and all for one! Otherwise we are finished."

Europe is rattled by events in Venezuela, and there are serious concerns that US disregard for international law may have consequences close to home.  The BBC diplomatic correspondent, James Landale, said, the question is how Europe may respond in the longer term to America's military operation in Venezuela. Will it provide a catalyst for the continent to take greater responsibility for its own security in the face of so much instability from what many see as an unreliable ally? Polish prime minister, Donald Tusk, appears to have answered the question, saying on social media: "No-one will take seriously a weak and divided Europe: neither enemy nor ally. It is already clear now. "We must finally believe in our own strength, we must continue to arm ourselves, we must stay united like never before. One for all, and all for one. Otherwise, we are finished." The US seizing of Venezuela's leader has faced strong criticism from both America's friends and foes at an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council, held on Monday, 5 January. Many member states agreed with the US that Nicolás Maduro had been an illegitimate and repressive leader. But many also condemned the US military action as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, and they demanded a democratic transition that reflected the will of the Venezuelan people. (click the image to read the full article).

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.