French Armed Forces Minister calls Mali's accusations of being abandoned by France “indecent”

Tensions continue to rise between France and Mali. “Unacceptable” and “indecent” accusations, which amount to “wiping ones feet on the blood of French soldiers” is how the Minister of the Armed Forces, Florence Parly, qualified, on Monday (27 September), the remarks made by the Malian prime minister, Choguel Kokalla Maïga, against France, on Saturday, at the tribune of the United Nations.

Indeed, during his speech at the UN General Assembly, Maïga accused France of abandoning Mali with its decision to withdraw the Barkhane force. The prime minister claimed that because of France's move to reconfigure its presence in Mali, the country had to find new ways to ensure its safety with the help of other partners, justifying the recruitment of mercenaries from the Russian paramilitary company Wagner.

During a conference in front of students from the prestigious French university Sciences Po Paris, Florence Parly added that “there is no French disengagement, I want to start by re-establishing untruths [...] When we have 5,000 soldiers and we disengage from three rights-of-way, and we intend to leave several thousand more, when state-of-the-art armoured vehicles are deployed in the Sahel […] this is not the normal attitude of a country which intends to leave.”

“It’s a lot of hypocrisy, it’s a lot of bad faith, a lot of indecency, especially because it was said on Saturday 25 September. However, on Friday 24 September, a 52nd French soldier gave his life to fight terrorism in the Sahel,” Parly said indignantly. A French soldier deployed as part of the Barkhane force was killed on Friday in Mali.

According to Parly, recruiting mercenaries from Wagner would represent a way to avoid keeping the commitments made by Mali vis-à-vis the international community regarding the elections that are planned for February 2022. 

“I have the impression that the date” on which the Malian authorities - who came to power by a coup d'état in August 2020 - committed themselves “does not suit them perfectly, and that they want to prolong the thing. But from there to wiping your feet on the blood of French soldiers, it is unacceptable,” she said.

Choguel Maïga told Agence France-Presse on Sunday that the elections could be postponed for a few weeks or months. Following this statement, at the UN on Monday, Paris reiterated its call for legislative and presidential elections to take place on 27 February 2022 in Mali, in accordance with commitments made to the international community by the Malian junta currently in power.

Earlier on Tuesday, the spokesperson for the French foreign ministry said that “the transformation of [France's] military system in the Sahel is neither a departure from Mali, nor a unilateral decision, and it is wrong to say the opposite.” The adaptation of this device was the subject of “consultations with the Sahel and Malian authorities since the Pau summit in January 2020”.

The commander of the Barkhane force also refuted on Monday any lack of consultations and any abandonment. “The plan to leave Kidal, Tessalit and Timbuktu [...] was drawn up with the heads of state of the G5 zone” (which includes Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso and Chad), declared General Laurent Michon during a trip to Nouakchott, Mauritania, recalling that the peacekeepers of the UN Mission MINUSMA and the Malian army remained present in these three places.

 

source: commonspace.eu with Le Monde (Paris) and agencies.
photo: Florence Parly at the military base of Gao, Mali, on Tuesday (21 September); @florence_parly (Twitter).

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.