Central Asian countries make diplomatic adjustments

The Foreign Ministers of both Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan have stepped down in the past few weeks. Kyrgyz FM, Ruslan Kazakbaev, resigned on 22 April and Uzbek FM, Abdulaziz Komilov, left his post on 27 April. The resignations come at a time of uncertainty in the Central Asia region.

In Kyrgyzstan, Erbol Sultanbaev, a spokesperson for President Sadyr Zhaparov, told RFE/RL on 22 April that Kazakbaev had stepped down. A lawmaker since 2015, Kazakbaev had been the FM since 14 October 2020 after previously serving in the same position from 2010 to 2012. The statement did not provide any reasons for the resignation, however, the decision came on the same day Russian FM Sergey Lavrov met with Central Asian Foreign Ministers. President Zhaparov announced two days later through his press service that he had appointed Jeenbek Kulubaev as acting Minister for Foreign Affairs. Kulubaev, a career diplomat, was the previous Head of the Foreign Policy Department of the Presidential administration. Kulubaev, also the former ambassador to China and specialises in relations with the country. The move may illustrate that Kyrgyzstan is focusing on shoring up relations with Beijing rather than with Moscow.

While little is known of the reasons for Kazakbaev’s departure, for Uzbek FM Komilov, the rationale for the dismissal is clearer. In a speech to lawmakers (17 March), Komilov supported the Ukrainian position of territorial sovereignty. He said “Firstly, the military actions and violence must be stopped right away. The Republic of Uzbekistan recognizes Ukraine's independence, sovereignty, and territorial integrity. We do not recognize the Luhansk and Donetsk republics.” The statements came as a surprise; Central Asian countries, due to their deep economic and political ties to Russia, are usually careful to not make large pronouncements on controversial actions carried out by the Kremlin.

After not being seen in public for close to two weeks after the speech, the Uzbek Foreign Ministry said Komilov was being treated for a “chronic illness” in the capital before being moved to an unspecified foreign country. Nearly a month after his abrupt departure from the public eye, Presidential spokesperson Sherzod Asadov said (27 April) that Komilov was to take up another role as deputy secretary of the presidential Security Council. Komilov has been a staple of Uzbek diplomacy dating back decades. Former US ambassador to Turkmenistan tweeted, “He has dominated Uzbek diplomacy to a degree not seen elsewhere in Central Asia […] As we say, he leaves big shoes to fill.”

 

Sources: CommonSpace.eu with RFE/RL (Prague), 24.kg (Bishkek), and other media agencies
Picture: Abdulaziz Komilov in April 2019 (AP)

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.