Biggest obstacle to reviving Iran deal still unresolved but talks may resume soon

After the recent impasse over the designation by the United States of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organisation, Iran signalled a willingness the reopen the seven-week stalled negotiations on the nuclear issue in Vienna. It has, however, not dropped its demands for the group it considers to be an integral part of its security structure to be removed from the the US’ Foreign Terrorist Organization list. 

Enrique Mora, the senior EU official coordinating the nuclear talks, was in Tehran last week for discussions with Iranian officials. The European negotiators remain the most optimistic of the prospects of an agreement, and are active in closing the remaining gaps between the US and Iran. 

The EU's foreign policy chief, Josep Borell, said he believed there had been enough progress during consultations between his envoy and Iranian officials in Tehran to relaunch nuclear negotiations after two months of deadlock.

“These things cannot be resolved overnight,” Borrell told reporters at a G7 foreign ministers' meeting in Germany. “Let's say the negotiations were blocked and they have been de-blocked", with the prospect of “reaching a final agreement”.

However, it seems the most challenging obstacle is yet to be overcomed. According to some western sources, the US might be willing to discuss the IRGC but only after a deal is settled. Following the visit of Mora, it is now believed that Iran will be back at the table for other non-IRGC topics. However, it is not clear if Iran will have any further, or alternative, demands. 

Public opinion about the IRGC designation in the US has also changed. Former President Trump added the IRGC to the list in 2019 based on allegations that the group has attacked numerous Americans and assassinated former officials. Now, Republican and Democratic senators have both registered their bipartisan opposition to removing the IRGC terrorist label in a nonbinding motion. 

Parties may meet again in Vienna in the coming weeks, but no decision has been made yet. 

Source: commonspace.eu with Politico Europe (Brussels) and Reuters (London).
Picture: Iran’s chief negotiator Ali Bagheri Kani and EU’s Enrique Mora meet in Tehran; Twitter: @AbasAslani 
 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular