Azerbaijan to restore relations with the European Parliament

The Azerbaijani Parliament (Milli Meclis) has decided to restore its relations with the European Parliament. The decision was taken on Friday during the first meeting of a new session of the Parliament.

"Azerbaijan wants to build a relationship with the European Union at the highest level. However, mutual interests must be respected,". This was stated by Samed Sayedov, the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the Milli Meclis when he presented the resolution for the consideration of the Parliament.

Sayedov said that an official delegation from the European Parliament had travelled to Azerbaijan recently and had frank discussions with the country's leadership and parliament.

Relations between Azerbaijan and the European Parliament reached breaking point last year when the European Parliament on 10 September 2015 adopted a critical resolution on Azerbaijan which triggered a sharp reaction in Azerbaijan

A year later a 15-person delegation of the European Parliament visited Azerbaijan to discuss the issue of repairing relations.

Commonspace.eu
political editor said in a comment that "the decision to restore parliamentary relations between Azerbaijan and the EU is very welcome.The European Parliament is one of the key institutions of the European Union and relations between the EU and Azerbaijan cannot develop if parliamentary relations are non existent. There was a feeling among many MEPs that the resolution of September 2015, whilst saying a lot of things that needed to be said, was clumsily drafted, and gave a very distorted picture of reality. There remain many issues in the bilateral agenda between Azerbaijan and the EU, and concerns about different aspects of Azerbaijan's record on governance and human rights. But with restored parliamentary dialogue it is hoped that these issues can be addressed in an open and frank, but respectful dialogue. There will be those in Azerbaijan, especially among the opposition forces who do not agree with this approach, but they are wrong. What is needed is not less dialogue between Azerbaijan and the EU, but a much more intensified dialogue during which all issues need to be discussed frankly"

source: commonspace.eu

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
The great American love-in in the South Caucasus has ended

The great American love-in in the South Caucasus has ended

US Vice President J.D, Vance has ended his whirlwind visit to the South Caucasus having been in Armenia on Monday (9th February), and Azerbaijan on Tuesday (10th February). It was a big success. Vance was on his best behavior, and went out of his way to be nice and complimentary to his hosts. In Yerevan, the Vice President and Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a joint statement on the completion of negotiations on a 123 Agreement, which establishes a legally binding framework for peaceful nuclear cooperation between the U.S. and partner countries. While in Azerbaijan, Vance and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev signed a Strategic Partnership Charter between the U.S. and Azerbaijan that covers regional connectivity, economic investment, and security and defense issues.  The guests were happy, and the hosts were delighted. Now it is time to put what was agreed in practice. That will be more challenging.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)