Armenian President says defining the status of Karabakh must come first

Serzh Sargsyan told the congress of the ruling  RPA  "as long as the status of Artsakh remains uncertain, no other issue can be solved" since this was the main problem, and everything else was "collateral"

Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan on Saturday (26 November) gave a wide-ranging speech at the opening of the 16th Convention of the ruling Republican Party of Armenia (RPA), of which he is also Chairman.

After dealing with a number of domestic and international issues, President Sargsyan used the speech to set out the Armenian position regarding how the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh can be resolved, stressing that defining the status of Nagorno-Karabakh must come first, and that everything else is, according to the official English translation of the speech published on the President's website, "collateral". This seems to contradict what has so far seemed to be the understanding within the ongoing negotiations facilitated by the OSCE Minsk group co-chair, that a step-by-step approach will lead to a decision on the final status, as a last issue to be defined.

The website of the Armenian president carried an English translation of the speech in which the president is quoted as saying the following:

"Our position remains unaltered: the problem of Nagorno-Karabakh can be solved exclusively through the free self-determination of the people of Artsakh. All other problems are collateral. All other issues will find their logical and fair solution, in parallel with the resolution of the problem. As long as this main problem exists, as long as the status of Artsakh remains uncertain, no other issue can be solved".

This statement seems to exclude the possibility that a peace plan can be implemented that will see Armenia release territories it has occupied around Nagorno-Karabakh back to Azerbaijan, for an interim status to be agreed, and for discussions and decisions on a final status for Karabakh to be dealt with as the final stage of the package.

Commonsapce.eu political editor said in a comment that this leaves the so-called "Madrid principles," that have been long flaunted as the sine qua non of a Karabakh peace process, in something of a limbo, Furthermore, it leaves the so-called "Lavrov ideas", the carefully crafted variation of the Madrid principles which have somewhat superseded the latter as the basis for negotiations, but which have never been made public, in tatters. They have been assumed to include a provision for Armenian withdrawal from some of the territories around Nagorno-Karabakh as a first step, leaving the issue of status for later.

With the Foreign Ministers of the two countries expected to meet in Hamburg around 8 December, on the margins of the Ministerial Council of the OSCE, it is now not clear what are going to be basis of those discussions.

Only recently, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliev, in a reference to the status of Nagorno-Karabakh in the framework of a conflict resolution agreement, said that the maximum level of autonomy that Azerbaijan was ready to envisage was that of an autonomous republic within Azerbaijan, This also at the time seemed to be jumping the gun, since discussions up to now had been based on the assumption that the final status of Nagorno-Karabakh would be decided by plebiscite, as the final step in a peace agreement. It could be that both leaders are simply setting markers for the discussions, and are willing to be more flexible in the course of negotiations. Given the history of these negotiations however this is unlikely."

You can read the full version of the speech of president Serzh Sargsyan to the 16th Convention of the republican Party of Armenia, held in Yerevan on Saturday, 26 November 2016, on the website of the Armenian presidency here.

 

Source: commonspace.eu with the press service of the president of Armenia

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)