August 2008 - A war that changed nothing and changed everything

Today marks the third anniverary of the start of the short Georgia-Russia War. It lasted five days.

Fighting initially began in and around the territory of South Ossetia which had, since 1992, been outside the jurisdiction of the central Georgian government. Russia accused Georgia of starting the fighting and of attacking its peacekeepers. It intervened with military operations against Georgian forces throughout the territory of Georgia.

In some ways the war changed nothing. The two regions of Georgia that had ceceded shortly after the collapse of the USSR remain outside Georgian jurisdiction. Hundreds of thousands of mainly Georgian people displaced by the conflict remain far away from their homes, their numbers augmented by more recently displaced persons from the 2008 war.

In other ways however the war marked the end of the post Soviet era. It saw Russian troops overtly intervening for the first time outside their borders since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Russia followed up its military successes by recognising Abkhazia and South Ossetia as independent countries, thus destroying the post Soviet order that was based on the borders of the 15 constituent republics of the USSR remaining intact. Georgia left the Commonwealth of Independent States and broke off diplomatic relations with Russia. Through a series of military, diplomatic, and economic agreements Abkhazia and South Ossetia have become more dependant on Russia than ever.

Whilst the fighting has stoped a long time ago the implications of the Georgia-Russia war are still to be fully felt and understood.

The new status quo is not sustainable and is a long term source of instability for the whole region. New efforts need to be exerted to normalise what is at the moment a very abnormal situation. Today is a good day to remember those who died in the Georgia-Russia War - Georgians, Ossetians, Russians and others. It is also a good time to reflect on the future.


Prepared by the commonspace.eu editorial team

Picture: a destroyed Georgian tank in Tskhinvali

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Aden under curfew, as problem in Yemen's south deepens

Aden under curfew, as problem in Yemen's south deepens

The port city of Aden, in Yemen's south, has been put under curfew, as the rift in the country between  the Saudi led coalition which  backs Yemen's presidential governing council, and the southern forces led by the Southern Transitional Council (STC), deepens. Abdul Rahman al-Mahrami, a member of the Yemeni Presidential Governing Council and commander of the al-Amalik brigades, has ordered a curfew in the temporary capital, Aden, "to maintain security". "A curfew has been imposed throughout Aden Governorate from 9:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., in accordance with the instructions of Commander Abdul Rahman al-Mahrami, a member of the Presidential Management Council," the statement said. It states that only security and military personnel, as well as medical and technical teams with approved permits, will be allowed to move in the area during these hours. Yemen's presidential council, which is backed by Saudi Arabia and which already is in a struggle with the Houthi Movement in the north of the country who also occupy the capital Sanaa, two days ago issued an order for the arrest of the head of the Southern Transitional Council (STC),, Aidarous al Zubaidi. The STC have wide support among people in the South, and advocate that South Yemen restores its independence. The coalition warned of further escalation in Aden, long regarded as an STC stronghold, as the Presidential Leadership Council (PLC) chief accused STC leader Aidarous Al Zubaidi of “high treason” and announced the revocation of his membership in the governing body. The moves mark a sharp escalation in tensions within the anti-Houthi camp, despite National Shield Forces, rivals of the STC and former allies, having recently retaken control of Hadhramaut and Mahra from southern fighters. The STC’s takeover of the two regions last month angered Saudi Arabia and contributed to igniting the current internal conflict. (click the picture to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Analysis
Analysis: Why what happens in Greenland matters

Analysis: Why what happens in Greenland matters

The snap elections for the parliament of Greenland last Tuesday (6 April 2021) attracted unusual interest from major powers who have been watching the political and economic impact of the election results on their interests in the Arctic region. Among them, the Chinese, who have invested in the Kvanefjeld mine on the island. Maximiliaan van Lange analyses the background to the recent Greenlandic general elections, and the Island's geostrategic position in the Arctic in this article for commonspace.eu.