Andrei Kaspzyk

We will not be able to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict in the near future but we must do something to minimize the threat of new war - this is the opinion of both the co-chairs and the conflicting parties. At the same time, both the Armenians and the Azeris are seeking to get as much as possible as a result of the peace talks, Andrzej Kasprzyk, personal representative of the OSCE CIO on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, said in an interview to Nowa Europa Wschodnia.

He said that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is very much like a dynamite for the Armenian and Azeri presidents: one wrong move and it may explode. They may lose their positions as a result so they need to be very careful. That's why they are thinking twice before doing something. The Azeris have oil and gas and has much bigger military budget while the Armenians have better geographic positions: they are deployed in highlands while the Azeris are mostly in lowlands.  

Kazprzyk said that there are still lots ot moot points: the Azeris agree to a corridor between Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh but the question is how wide it should be and who will control it before the peace agreement is signed. One more big problem is referendum: the Armenians suggest voting in Nagorno-Karabakh, where were thrice as many Armenians in 1989, while the Azeris insist on a voting covering the whole territory of Azerbaijan. So, there is yet no agreement when exactly the referendum will be held.

Kazprzyk believes that today it is necessary to reduce the tension coming from the sense of endless war. Only patient negotiations will lead to agreement. For the moment, the parties are failing to come to terms and keep appointing new meetings. This is at least a guarantee that there will be no new war. A special committee may be formed for considering ways of to hold the referendum and to determine the status of Nagorno-Karabakh but this will happen only when the tension drops. One thing is clear: this conflict cannot be resolved at one stroke as this would result in displeasure from either the Armenians or the Azeris. 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Intercepts Ballistic Missiles as Russia Continues Nationwide Air Assault

Ukraine Intercepts Ballistic Missiles as Russia Continues Nationwide Air Assault

Ukraine's air defenses intercepted five Russian ballistic missiles during a large-scale overnight attack on July 14–15, marking the first reported successful interceptions of ballistic missiles in nearly two weeks as Kyiv seeks to strengthen its air defense capabilities amid continuing Russian strikes. According to the Ukrainian Air Force, Russia launched eight Iskander-M/S-400 ballistic missiles, two Kh-59/69 cruise missiles, and 135 attack drones overnight. Ukrainian forces said they destroyed seven missiles, including five ballistic missiles, and intercepted 108 drones. However, several missiles and drones penetrated the country's defenses, damaging civilian infrastructure in Kyiv and other regions. In the capital, explosions were reported shortly after midnight, with President Volodymyr Zelensky saying that 16 sites were damaged, including a school and a civilian enterprise. Kyiv Mayor Vitali Klitschko reported fires at two warehouses. While no fatalities were recorded in the capital, Russian attacks elsewhere in the country killed at least seven people and injured 78, according to regional authorities. Casualties were reported in Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Kharkiv, and Chernihiv oblasts, with critical infrastructure also struck in several regions. The successful interceptions come after weeks of concern over Ukraine's dwindling supply of interceptor missiles. Following a massive Russian strike on July 6, Ukrainian officials said they failed to intercept any of the 29 ballistic missiles launched, prompting Air Force spokesperson Yurii Ihnat to warn that the country lacked sufficient interceptor missiles to counter such attacks. Although the Ukrainian Air Force did not specify which system was used during the latest attack, the ballistic missiles were likely intercepted by U.S.-supplied Patriot systems, Ukraine's most effective defense against Russian ballistic threats. President Volodymyr Zelensky himself has repeatedly cautioned that Patriot interceptor stocks are critically low, a shortage that recently prompted the United States to approve a licensing agreement allowing the missiles to be produced in Ukraine with U.S. support. Speaking after the latest bombardment, Zelensky has once again renewed calls for tougher sanctions against Russia and urged the European Union to adopt its 21st sanctions package. "Every day sanctions are delayed gives Russia additional time to prepare. Everything Russia uses to prolong this war and attack people – chips, microelectronics, dual-use goods – must be stopped," Zelensky argued. He also reiterated the need to establish a European anti-ballistic missile defense system, describing it as a more affordable, mass-produced complement to the U.S.-made Patriot system. The appeal comes as Ukraine and its allies expand defense cooperation. During Bastille Day events in Paris on July 14, Zelensky announced the creation of a coalition of ten countries to develop a shared European ballistic missile shield. He said the initiative aims to create a more affordable, mass-produced system that would complement existing Patriot batteries. During the same gathering of the “coalition of the willing,” France also pledged additional military assistance, including advanced SAMP/T-NG air defense systems, Rafale fighter jets, and cooperation on domestic production of Western missiles and precision-guided munitions. The initiative follows a separate agreement with the United States, conceived at the NATO Summit in Ankara, allowing Ukraine to begin licensed production of Patriot interceptor missiles. 

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)