EU-Azerbaijan Relations are good. Now it is time to make them better. Oil, gas, pipelines and human rights discussed during Aliev's visit to EU.

President Ilham Aliev of Azerbaijan yesterday visited the European institutions in Brussels. He met the President of the European Council, Herman van Rompuy and the President of the European Commission Jose Manuel Barroso. Discussions focused on the future of Azerbaijan's relations with the European Union, issues of tangible cooperation particularly connected with energy, and questions of democratisation and human rights.

 

Speaking after his meeting with the Azerbaijani leader, President Herman van Rompuy said

 

"EU-Azerbaijan relations are good. Our long term committment is to strenghtening our relations even further by working towards concluding negotiations on the Association Agreement. With an Association Agreement our relationship can achieve its full potential". Van Rompuy said that he had reminded President Aliev "of the European Union's very firm ambition to achieve a long term association with Azerbaijan, with democracy and shared values at its core, in particular human rights and fundamental freedoms."

 

The theme was later echoed by the President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso. who told President Aliev that "2013 is indeed a year of great opportunity for EU-Azerbaijan relations. I stand for broader and deeper relations with your nation, a country which we very much respect, with energy as an excellent starting point and with shared values at the core."

 

Energy dominated the discussions in the meetings between President Aliev and EU leaders. As President Barroso said at the conclusion of the visit, the stakes are quite high. Referring to the new gas pipeline project that will connect Azerbaijan to European energy markets Barroso said:  "The Southern Gas Corridor is not a theoretical project on the drawing board. It is about to be realized, to the benefit of all involved. It will bring initially 10 billion cubic meters to Europe by 2019, but we will not stop here. The Corridor could in the medium term cover more than 10% of our annual needs in Europe and thus contribute to our energy security, price stability, growth and jobs. This is our common vision as President Aliyev and I agreed in 2011. This is what we will keep working for, to enhance our mutual security of supply. We believe this is in the best interest of Europe and Azerbaijan."

 

On his part President Aliev also highlighted the importance of relations with the EU for Azerbaijan. He said “Azerbaijan wants to be close to Europe as much as possible.” Aliev reiterated that Azerbaijan and the EU are continuing cooperating within the framework of the Eastern Partnership program. Ilham Aliyev expressed his thanks to the European institutions for supporting Azerbaijan’s development, including in the area of human rights. “This support helps Azerbaijan carry out reforms in line with the high world standards,” he said.

 

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment:

 

"The visit of President Aliev to the European institutions in Brussels came at a very decisive moment in EU-Azerbaijan relations. The two sides understand that this is a defining moment for these relations and that they now need either to deepen their relationship or distant themselves from each other. It seems from the tone and the atmosphere during the Brussels meetings that the two sides have decided to take the relationship forward. This requires balancing the economic side of the co-operation, particularly in the energy sector, with a sound political basis, particularly related to issues of governance and human rights. Both sides now recognise that these processes cannot be separated. The next few weeks will show if words can now be translated into deeds. The decision on the Southern Energy Corridor is due in the next days. President Barroso has hinted that in the long term both options that are currently being considered may be implemented, but for the moment a clear choice will set the process of construction in motion. In the political sphere Azerbaijan will hold Presidential elections in October. It is clear that much depends on how these elections are conducted and on the ability of the Azerbaijani leadership to conduct elections that are not only technically well organised, but that are held in an atmosphere that will allow the Azerbaijani people to elect their leader in a free and fair environment. The message coming out from the Brussels meetings are clear. EU-Azerbaijan relations are good. Now is the time to make them better."

 

source: commonspace.eu with the Press Service of the European Union and agencies.

 

picture: President Barroso and President Aliev in Brussels on 21 June 2013. (Picture courtesy of the Press and Audio Visual Serviuce of the European Union."

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)