The United States returns to Central Asia.

US Secretary of State John Kerry is currently on a tour of all five Central Asian countries heralding a new chapter in relations with the region.

The United States has embarked on a comprehensive charm offensive aimed at the states of Central Asia. US Secretary of State John Kerry is currently visiting the region, in an unprecedented tour that will see him visiting all the five Central Asian Countries, meeting their leaders and engaging with different parts of the societies.

Kerry kicked off his trip in Bishkek where he met President Atambaev. Kerry described Kyrgyzstan as "a vital partner in a growing Central Asia". He also presided over the official opening of the new campus of the American University of Central Asia, an increasingly important academic hub for the whole region.

From Bishkek Kerry travelled to Tashkent for a meeting with Uzbek President Islam Karimov for what he described as "a good discussion". Kerry characterised Uzbekistan as "an important partner in bringing peace [and] prosperity to Central Asia".

In Tashkent, Kerry also had a meeting with the foreign ministers of the five Central Asian states in a new 5 + 1 formula, emphasising that the United States is looking at relations with the region in both a bilateral as well as multilateral format.

On Monday Kerry was in Kazakhstan for a "wide-ranging meeting" with President Nazarbaev. Kerry said that Kazakhstan has a "solid record of leadership in region", and  is a "valued partner.

Kerry is also expected to visit Turkmenistan and Tadjikistan in the next days.

The visit of John Kerry to Central Asia heralds a new chapter in US relations with the region. During his visit Kerry had to navigate around a number of issues that in one way or the other in the past were an obstacle to a more robust American relationship. The region's human rights record and Russia's dominating influence in the region were some of them. Kerry has tried to address these issues during his visit to the region, emphasising the need to look forward. Speaking at Nazarbaev University in Astana, John Kerry stated:

"........ the United States of America is aware that security and stability in Central Asia is an important building block for global security. Your neighborhood includes, obviously, Russia, Iran, Afghanistan, and China - that's your neighborhood. And you sit at the connection of some of the most significant foreign policy and security challenges anywhere on the planet.

But America's stake in Central Asia, I want to emphasize to you, extends far beyond security. This is, after all, the region where globalization truly began. For centuries, your countries - long before we even existed as a country, you were an integral part of a vital economic artery that stretched from Istanbul to Shanghai, and you provided opportunities for trade, for transport, for travel between and across civilizations. You helped to define those civilizations, and those defined - those civilizations have defined all of us today. And today what we want to see is not a struggle between China and Russia and the United States in a zero-sum game. What we want to see is a Central Asia that claims its place as an engine of growth at the heart of a modern and dynamic Asia. And when we invest in each other, all our societies benefit.

Now, of course, we have learned over time that both stability and prosperity are closely linked to good governance - governance that is powered by participatory, accountable institutions and guided by the rule of law.

We know and we have learned - sometimes the hard way - that holding elections, as important as they are, is just one element of real democracy. And this is a lesson we have learned in the United States over more than 200 years. Elections matter little if they are not free and fair, with all political parties competing on a level playing field. And promises contained in constitutions and laws - they don't amount to much unless those promises are actually kept. That's why accountable governance is also measured by the independence of a judiciary; by the health of the civil society; by the ability of every individual to enjoy basic freedoms of thought, speech, and religion, and to engage in political expression of political views.

Now, no democracy is perfect, and obviously, we know that through our own experience. We see it every day. It's a continuing journey. It's why we think of democracy not as a final destination but as an endless pursuit. Every country, including the United States, has room to improve.

Now, obviously, the future of Kazakhstan and this region will be determined and should be determined by the people who live here, not by the United States or any other country. But we want to partner with you how, where, and when we can. And we know that there is a strong platform that you have built on which we can now build together.

A Kazakh proverb teaches that nothing is as remote as yesterday and nothing is as close as tomorrow. In other words, the future is coming whether you're ready for it or not. So we'd better do everything that we can, all of us, to take every moment to prepare ourselves. And particularly in this new world that we live today, where everybody is connected 24/7; where even in the poorest places people have smartphones which gives them access to ideas, to products, to people, to aspirations - and that changes politics everywhere."

Commonspace.eu political editor said in a comment that “Kerry’s visit is of huge significance and places the United States as a stakeholder in the region’s development. For the last decade the US presence in the region looked very much faded. Russia has tried to crawl back some of the influence that it had in the region before the collapse of the USSR. Times however are different. Russia’s biggest challenge in the region at the moment is not from the United States but rather from China. Other Asian countries also vie for influence. The five central Asian states have also developed their own way of managing relations with Russia, re-assuring Moscow on the one hand, but also seeking to maintain room for manoeuvre in their international relations. They have therefore been keen to roll out the red carpet to Kerry, not least because the Secretary of State has adopted a more pragmatic approach to their domestic political circumstances. Whilst this has opened him for some criticism from human rights activists and sections of the media, observers of the region think that a more robust engagement is much more likely to result in positive changes than simply ignoring or isolating the region.”

Source: commonspace.eu with @JohnKerry and the US Department of State press office.

Photo: US Secretary of State John Kerry with the Foreign Ministers of the five Central Asian states at their meeting in Tashkent on Sunday, 1 November 2015. (Picture courtesy of the US State department).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)