Commentary: A moratorium on the death penalty can offer a basis for a new EU-GCC relationship

A ten year moratorium on capital punishment can offer a good basis for renewed EU-GCC relations argue the commonspace.eu editorial team in this commentary. This commentary was first published in our sister publication Arabia Concise.

On 10 February the EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Josep Borrell, held a meeting in Brussels with the Bahraini foreign minister, Dr Abdullatif bin Rashid Alzayani, during which a “Cooperation Arrangement” was signed. It was a low-key affair, with Borrell’s controversial trip to Russia the week before still dominating chit-chatter over the EU’s foreign policy agenda.

The meeting was the latest in a number of small steps that indicate an increased EU interest in the Gulf region, particularly the six GCC countries – Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. Many EU member states have strong and long-running bilateral relations with the countries of the region, ranging from the larger member states such as France, Germany, and Italy, to the smaller ones such as the Netherlands, Malta, and Greece. Many believe that the EU’s relations with the GCC as a bloc need to be expanded, taking into account the huge transformational developments ongoing in the region itself, and a looming potential security deficit as the US refocuses its attention to the Indo-Pacific.

The document signed by Borrell with Bahrain on 10 February was described as a “Cooperation Arrangement between the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of Bahrain” – a technical document at best. It provides “an institutional framework for political dialogue and cooperation in areas such as trade, research and innovation, clean energy and renewables.”

It is a small start and “both sides look forward to holding the first EU-Bahrain Senior Officials Meeting later this year, where possibilities of bilateral cooperation will be further explored, including in support of Bahrain’s economic diversification efforts”, an EEAS statement said. It added, “the importance of human rights in the bilateral relationship was underlined with the 5th round of the Human Rights Working Group to be held shortly offering another opportunity to engage in this field.” In Brussels, the Bahraini Foreign Minister also met with European Council president, Charles Michel (picture above).

Relations with Gulf countries tend to receive attention in the media and in the European Parliament often for the wrong reasons, namely the human rights situation which nonetheless remains problematic, and issues revolving around gender rights and the rights of foreign workers. Conversely, there is little focus on people-to-people contacts, support for reforms and societal changes in the Gulf. Diplomats like to say that quiet diplomacy works better than megaphone diplomacy. Some argue that the subtle but sustained engagement on human rights that the Commission and the EEAS appear to have adopted offers a much better approach than the more confrontational style often adopted by the European Parliament, which prefers to name and shame. However, in the context of the GCC countries, a balanced bit of both will go a long way.

The Gulf states are strategically located in the Middle East, and there is already an extensive EU-GCC security agenda that is likely to expand. The GCC countries are an important source for the EU’s energy; they are also important markets for EU trade. The EU must find a way in which it can move relations forward and help the countries as they pursue their own reform agendas whilst keeping human rights and freedoms high on its priorities – through robust dialogue if possible, and robust action if necessary.

Abolishment of the death penalty may offer an important benchmark

It may help to move the discussion about human rights in the context of EU-Gulf relations from the abstract to the tangible, and one area that could serve as a starting point is the issue of the death penalty. All six GCC countries have the death penalty on their statutes although in practice some have not used it for a long time. Saudi Arabia in the past has been the biggest culprit, but even there some progress can be seen. The state-backed Saudi Human Rights Commission recently announced that 27 executions were recorded in 2020. That is down from 184 the year before according to Amnesty International, when Saudi Arabia trailed only China and Iran globally. However, critics attribute the decline to COVID-19 rather than a change of policy. There are around 80 people currently believed to be facing the death penalty in various stages of a trial. Nonetheless, the perception of the death penalty is changing in Riyadh.

The EU should promote the idea of a moratorium on capital punishment across the GCC for a period of ten years, followed by abolition. This is a tangible benchmark to which diplomats, MEPs and activists should strive.

source: This commentary was prepared by the commonspace.eu editorial team. It was first published in our sister publication Arabia Concise on 23 February 2021.
photo: Bahraini Foreign Minister, Dr Abdullatif bin Rashid Alzayani, met with European Council president, Charles Michel in Brussels in February.

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)