All eyes on the Hague. The nuclear security summit in the Dutch capital will be the first opportunity for world leaders to consider the situation in Ukraine in face to face meetings.

World leaders are gathering in the Dutch capital The Hague for a nuclear safety summit which has been long in the planning. The topic of the summit is important enough but the summit has assumed even larger importance in view of the current crisis in Ukraine, and Russia's actions which are seen as having badly damaged the international system that regulates relations between nations.

The summit will be attended by President Barak Obama of the United States and President Xi Jinping of China, as well as European leaders amongst others. In view of the current crisis over Ukraine a number of side meetings have been scheduled, including a meeting of the G7 group. This will be the first time world leaders will be meeting face to face since the Ukraine crisis erupted. From this meeting the second wave of global responses to Russian aggression in Ukraine is likely to emerge. Russia will be represented in the summit by the Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov who is likely to encounter a chilly reception.

Whilst there is a clear determination, on the part of western leaders at least, that it should not be business as usual with Russia in the future, there is still a lot of ambiguity about how to deal with Russia on a range of other issues on which there had been close co-operation in the past. One such issue is the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. The leaders of both Armenia and Azerbaijan will also be in the Hague, accompanied by their Foreign Ministers. The process entrusted to mediate a solution of the conflict - the so called OSCE Minsk Process - is headed by France, Russia and the United States, and a good level of co-operation between diplomats of the three countries has been reported in the past.

In Hague they hope to organise another meeting between president Sargsyan of Armenia and president Aliev of Azerbaijan, or failing that one between their foreign ministers, and a lot of largely behind the scenes activity has been going on in this direction. There is a sense that the Minsk process should be insulated from the current problems between Russia and the western countries led by the US, but given the proximity of the issues to those that impact the Karabakh conflict this is likely to prove difficult.

On the other hand both Armenia and Azerbaijan may feel that given the current international situation, and the dangers that it creates to their own countries, this may be a good time for a grand gesture so the timing may offer an opportunity as much as it creates obstacles.

So for the next days all eyes will be on Hague to see how world leaders are proposing to proceed.

source: commonspace.eu

photo: The skyline of the Dutch Capital, The Hague where world leaders are gathering for a summit on nuclear safety.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan edge closer to a peace deal

Armenia and Azerbaijan last week announced they had agreed on the process of demarcation of their border in the Tavush region that will result in the return of four villages that had been under Armenian control since the conflict in the 1990s to Azerbaijan. The agreement is being seen as a milestone event that will greatly contribute to finalising the process leading towards the signing of a peace agreement between the two countries, who have been in conflict for more than three decades. The agreement comes after months of negotiations, and controversy, including some opposition from Armenian residents in the proximity of the four villages. On 19 April, it was announced that the eighth meeting of the Committee on Demarcation and Border Security of the State Border between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan and the State Committee on the Demarcation of the State Border between the Republic of Azerbaijan and the Republic of Armenia was held under the chairmanship of Armenian Deputy Prime Minister Mher Grigoryan and Azerbaijani Deputy Prime Minister Shahin Mustafaev. There are of course many small details that will have to be ironed out later, but the fact that the sides have agreed the basic parameters, and especially their re-affirmation that they will "be guided by Alma Ata's 1991 Declaration in the demarcation process" is a huge step forward. No wonder that the international community in the last few days have lined up to congratulate the two sides on their success and to nudge them forward to complete the process of signing a peace agreement between them. Seasoned observers now see the signing of such an agreement as being truly within reach. Of course, there will be those who for one reason or another will not like these developments and will try to spoil the process. Armenia and Azerbaijan must remain focused on overcoming any last obstacles, and on its part, the international community must also remain focused in helping them do so as a priority.