CIS member-states agree on free trade zone

According to the RF Government press-service, The Prime Ministers of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) member states have signed a free trade agreement, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said on Tuesday.

The agreement eliminates export and import duties on a host of goods. It also contains a number of exemptions that will ultimately be phased out.

The agreement was signed by all the CIS states except Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan.

"As a result of the long, sharp, but constructive talks we:have agreed today to sign a CIS free trade zone agreement," Putin said earlier.

Putin stressed that the deal is "a fundamental document that will lay the groundwork for long-term relations."

The CIS, a loose association of former Soviet republics, consists of  Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. Ukraine has not ratified the CIS Charter but participates in its activities.

The CIS has been trying to form a free trade zone since as far back as the early 1990s and held a summit in Moscow in May in which a draft agreement was presented, but there was no final signature. Belarus, Kazakhstan and Russia formed their own Customs Union earlier this year.

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Twenty-five years ago, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1325, which recognised what women around the world had long demonstrated through their actions: that peace cannot be built without them, and that gender justice is essential for true security. Resolution 1325 recognised that women must be included in peace processes, and that conflict affects women and girls differently. Over the years, the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda has produced an extensive body of rhetoric: national action plans, reporting frameworks, new Security Council resolutions and regular open debates.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Opinion: Women, Peace and Security: Words Endure, but Government Action Lags

Twenty-five years ago, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 1325, which recognised what women around the world had long demonstrated through their actions: that peace cannot be built without them, and that gender justice is essential for true security. Resolution 1325 recognised that women must be included in peace processes, and that conflict affects women and girls differently. Over the years, the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) agenda has produced an extensive body of rhetoric: national action plans, reporting frameworks, new Security Council resolutions and regular open debates.