Baku's twilight zone. The OSCE PA meeting in Azerbaijan opens up space for internal debate.

Commentary prepared by the editorial team of Commonspace.eu

The meeting of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly in Baku highlights Azerbaijan's readiness to manoevre around complicated foreign and domestic political agendas in front of a home audience.

The 23rd Annual Session of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE PA) is currently taking place in the Azerbaijani capital, Baku. Parliamentary delegations from the 57 member states of the OSCE, including Armenia, are participating in the event which opened on Saturday with keynote speeches by the current Chairman-in-Office of the OSCE, Didier Burkhalter, who is also the President of Switzerland, and by the President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliev. This annual meeting has an ambitious agenda focusing on the challenges in the OSCE area. As expected Ukraine is one of the main topics under discussion. High level parliamentary delegations from both Russia and Ukraine are present in Baku and the issues connected with the Ukraine crisis are on the mind of many of the participants and a full debate on Ukraine will take place on the last day (Tuesday).

For the host country, Azerbaijan, the meeting is of the utmost significance. This is not only one of the largest and most prestigious meetings ever held in the Azerbaijani capital. It also has direct significance for the country's foreign and domestic policy.

First, there is the presence in the meeting of an Armenian parliamentary delegation. This is not the first time that a parliamentary delegation from Armenia is attending such an event in Baku. Indeed only three weeks ago a similar delegation attended an event of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. That event was overshadowed by sharp exchanges between the Armenian visitors and their Azerbaijani hosts. But as commonspace.eu reported on that occasion, a precedent had been set. The OSCE event has also seen some sharp exchanges between the two, but at least until now, the atmosphere is calmer. The novelty is wearing off, and the media can focus on other things. Small demonstrations took place against the Armenian presence, but there was no huge public outcry against the Armenian presence. This will hopefully create conditions for more such visits in the future

The OSCE is also the framework for the Minsk Process that is seeking to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. This process is stalled. The current Swiss Chairmanship has been trying to restart it, calling for another meeting between the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan, with a structured agenda. President Burkhalter took the opportunity to repeat this at his opening address on Saturday. The meeting also enabled French MPs to criticise Azerbaijan for putting one of their colleagues on a blacklist for having visited Nagorno-Karabakh. Azerbaijan says that visitors to its occupied territories without co-ordinating with its embassies infringe Azerbaijani law. Overall, an open and honest discussion on the conflict in both Armenia and Azerbaijan is necessary if the conflict is to be resolved. The maximalist positions need to be challenged. We are not there yet, but the recent international meetings in Baku have started carving out some space for discussion and as such are an important contribution to the process.

That brings us to the second important significance of the meeting. Azerbaijan has been under a lot of criticism recently for its record on democratic governance. The OSCE's own Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights was highly critical of the Presidential elections held last year; there have also been tough statements in the past from the OSCE Commissioner on Media Freedom regarding the treatment of journalists. Azerbaijan has used heavy handed tactics in the OSCE Permanent Council in Vienna and forced the downgrade of the OSCE Office in Baku to that of a project office, threatening to veto the whole OSCE budget if it does not get its way. So holding the OSCE PA annual meeting in Baku has risks for both sides. President Aliev in his opening speech on Saturday sought to nip the problem in the bud by addressing issues of democratic governance and highlighting the importance for political reforms which he said need to move hand in hand with economic reforms. Aliev repeated the theme that he set when a few days before he addressed the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, stressing that Azerbaijan has no political prisoners. Of course nobody can deny that there are dozens of political activists, including some still in their teens, who are rotting in Baku's jails accused or convicted of a variety of crimes. Amnesty International calls them political prisoners. The government of Azerbaijan says they are simply criminals. Holding the OSCE PA annual assembly in Baku is on the one hand a prestige for the Azerbaijan government and adds to its legitimacy. However the focus on human rights and other shortcomings, in as much as it has taken place, puts the Azerbaijani government on the spot. There has been criticism that the Azerbaijani NGOs that were invited to attend as guests in the meeting were mainly the ones friendly to the government. If that is the case than this was a shortcoming of the leadership of the OSCE PA which needs to be addressed in the wider European context. In the end however this is a meeting of parliamentarians, and the onus is on the parliamentarians present to raise issues of human rights and democratic defecit as appropriate.

The meeting is also important because it tests Azerbaijan's carefully calculated balancing acts in foreign policy. Discussions on the crisis in Ukraine puts Azerbaijan in a difficult position. On the one hand it is committed in supporting Ukraine's territorial integrity, and has joined the other ninety-nine countries which a few weeks ago condemned Russia's annexation of Crimea at the UN General Assembly. On the other hand Azerbaijan's does not want to be seen as a part of an anti-Russia front. On Saturday, the Azerbaijani parliamentary delegation tried to fudge the issue when confronted with the opening shots of an anti-Russia move during the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly's meeting. It is difficult to see how they will be able to continue doing so by the time the meeting ends tomorrow.

These are difficult issues for Azerbaijan, but the fact that they are being discussed in the presence of the media, and mostly televised live at least on the internet may help create more space for these debates to take place in the wider Azerbaijani society once the foreign guests have gone home. Discussions such as the one that are taking place these days in the framework of the OSCE PA, and the ones held in the framework of the NATO PA earlier this month, open up the space for debate within Azerbaijan. It shows that the leadership of Azerbaijan is not averse to this, at least occasionally and in the controlled environments of international meetings. These meetings are creating a twilight zone in Baku. Time will tell whether this twilight is heralding sunrise, or whether it is the sign of sunset.

This commentary is prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

photo: President Ilham Aliev of Azerbaijan addressing the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Annual Session in Baku on 28 June 2014. (picture courtesy of the press service of the President of Azerbaijan.)


 

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

European Union and Canada agree on "Alliance for the future" at milestone Montreal summit

António Costa, President of the European Council, and Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, represented the EU at the 21st EU-Canada summit, which took place in Montreal on 29 and 30 October 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney represented Canada. The summit marked a major milestone in EU-Canada relations, paving the way for an even broader and deeper political partnership. Leaders took stock of progress made since the previous EU-Canada summit and issued a joint statement launching an Alliance for the Future. Building on their longstanding strategic partnership, the alliance aims to deepen cooperation and create a common prosperity and economic security space. This is a moment to act with clarity and ambition. By aligning more closely – economically, technologically and strategically – Canada and the EU are building an Alliance for the Future based on trust and shared values that meets the scale of today's challenges and opportunities and will reinforce the freedom, prosperity and safety our citizens expect and deserve. We are stronger together. Building on their existing Strategic Partnership Agreement, the EU and Canada will deepen political engagement and coordination on shared priorities. Leaders welcomed the increasingly frequent exchanges with Canadian ministers at relevant Council and ministerial meetings. The EU and Canada will build on these exchanges through regular summits, joint ministerial meetings and cooperation committees. The partners will work to define the concept of an ever-closer association of Canada to the EU, short of full membership, by the 2027 EU-Canada summit. (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)