ArmInfo: The National Interest: In the conflict zone stretching from Syria to Afghanistan lies another war waiting to re-emerge: Nagorno-Karabakh

Yerevan, February 11. ArmInfo. 

"In the conflict zone stretching from Syria to Afghanistan lies another war waiting to re-emerge: Nagorno-Karabakh. This dispute is likely to occupy President Obama's new foreign-policy team whether they want it or not," wrote E. Wayne Merry in an item "Another Regional War in the Wings" in The National Interest Magazine.

"...Since then, a mediation effort led by Washington, Moscow and Paris has sought a solution. Despite the best efforts of the three governments-including presidential initiatives by all three-the parties to the conflict do not and will not negotiate. This impasse has contributed to a dangerous evolution of the dispute in recent years from post-war to pre-war. A major arms race is underway, fueled by Azerbaijan's oil and gas wealth and by Armenia's support from Russia. Azerbaijan is acquiring a distinct advantage in military technology and firepower, but Armenia retains major advantages of terrain and operational skill. 

Azerbaijan has a patron in Turkey, which feels a fraternal commitment, but Armenia has a treaty-based security alliance and historical partnership with Russia.

A new war would likely be pyrrhic for both sides, but also dwarf the first war in scale and destruction. The initial conflict was limited to Karabakh and its surroundings, and was largely an infantry fight. The next war will engage Armenia and Azerbaijan against each other directly, with greatly expanded arsenals. Both sides plan on this basis and both threaten to target civilian infrastructure, such as pipelines. Serious ceasefire violations have recently occurred on their joint border, not just around Karabakh.  The broader danger lies in the patron-client relationships of the regional great powers, Russia with Armenia and Turkey with Azerbaijan.

Ankara and Moscow would not actually come to blows in a new Karabakh war, but both can be dragged into dangerous circumstances by their clients. The Azerbaijani tail has already wagged the Turkish dog to prevent normalizing relations between Ankara and Yerevan. For the time being, Iran plays a marginal political role, but provides vital energy and trade links to Armenia. However, Tehran's relations with Baku are poisonous and, in a new Karabakh war, Iran might seek to settle accounts.

The missing element in the diplomatic equation is Turkey, which needs to play a political role comparable to Russia. Only Moscow and Ankara working together can restrain their clients from renewed war and compel them to real negotiations.

"Ankara and Moscow have differing priorities on Karabakh, but they share broadly similar views on Black Sea, Caucasian and Caspian issues. They both want to avoid a war between Armenia and Azerbaijan while not allowing their clients to compromise their own wider interests:American diplomats have tried to be evenhanded toward Armenia and Azerbaijan, but U.S. influence on this conflict is, candidly, inadequate. 

Thus, Washington should encourage a more active Turkish role and welcome collaboration by Russia and Turkey as Caucasian peacemakers," The National Interest wrote. 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Donald Trump’s extraordinary TV address

Donald Trump’s extraordinary TV address

United States President Donald Trump has delivered an extraordinary prime time television speech, alleging government “cover-ups” and “vulnerability” in the nation’s electoral system. He made broad accusations about a “deep state” conspiracy involving his Democratic predecessors, Barack Obama and Joe Biden, and he lashed out at familiar foes, including the news media and China. For years, Trump has spread baseless claims that his loss in the 2020 presidential election was “rigged” and “stolen”. Trump stopped short of repeating his false claim that he had, in fact, won that race. But in his remarks, he sought to raise suspicion about the election’s outcome, pointing to declassified government documents. Those files, however, painted a more nuanced picture than Trump portrayed, and they failed to substantiate his claims of a conspiracy. After the speech, Democrats criticised Trump for attempting to mislead the public and reduce confidence in the US electoral system, with months to go until the November midterm election. One of the biggest accusations of the night was levied against China, the US’s geopolitical rival. “Starting during the 2020 election cycle, the People’s Republic of China carried out what is believed to be the largest compromise of election data in history,” Trump said near the outset of his speech. He claimed that Beijing, through “illicit” means, had acquired 220 million US voter files, including names, addresses and party preferences. “Think of that: Tens of millions of voters’ data in 18 states have been bought, stolen or hacked by China,” Trump said. A spokesperson for China’s embassy denied such claims, saying the country “has never and will never interfere in the presidential elections of the US”. Trump, however, did not say that the information had been used to influence any election. But critics pointed out that such voter information is already publicly available. Some states even sell that public data, for prices ranging from $0 to $37,000, as the US Election Assistance Commission explained in a 2020 report. The documents declassified by the White House also appeared to indicate Beijing was, at least in part, drawing from publicly available data. It did, however, express curiosity at China’s increasing interest in such information. “While the PRC [People’s Republic of China] government has historically demonstrated interest in US elections, this is a newly-identified interest for this individual actor,” a heavily redacted assessment said. “The US voter registration information is available for public download, with 2021 voter registration information available for some states.”  (click image to read more)

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)