Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan demand certain public and political figures to stop derision

Over the last 1.5 year certain public and political figures and public organizations have assumed to themselves the right to come out on behalf of all the Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan, says the statement by a group of Armenian refugees.

The statement signed by around 500 refugees reads: "These people think it enough to name their organizations 'Congress of authorized representatives of Azerbaijani Armenians' or 'Assembly of Azerbaijani Armenians' to assume the right to themselves to submit their projects to the Armenian and world community as quintessence of aspirations, hopes and goals of all the Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan. Some of them suggest building a town in the liberated territories and expel 100,000 Armenian refugees from Azerbaijan to that town. Others are sure that we should return to Baku and live side by side with those who killed our relatives and expelled us. They speak of a third Armenian country of refugees that should be created in the liberated territories. We are alive and we don't want to become a weapon in the hands of adventurers, pseudo-politicians and irresponsible people. None of those people has done anything to deserve our trust and to speak on our behalf:.Let's Ashot Manucharyan, Andreas Ghukasyan, Mariam Avagyan, Anahit Tarkhanyan, Hranush Hakobyan, Nikolay Babajanyan, Grigory Ayvazyan and others (if there are any) set tents in the liberated territories and start building statehood and town for themselves. Maybe in some 3-4 years other patriots will join them. Without all this, their statements are nothing but phrasemongering," the statement reads.

The refugees further state: "We believe that Armenians of Azerbaijan suffered a huge moral and material damage that must be recompensed by Azerbaijan. Relevant authorities of Armenia and Artsakh should raise the issue of compensation and not the self-proclaimed 'defenders' of the refugees' rights."

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

Mecca Joint Defence Agreement is a historic development that may change the face of the Wider Middle East

The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement, signed on 7 August 2026 in Mecca, by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, establishes a collective defence arrangement under which an armed attack against any one of the three states is to be regarded as an attack against all three. This is a historic step, and the agreement is a landmark event, that will change the future of the wider Middle East. Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan are different countries with many particular features. But there is enough common ground between them to make the new situation created by the Mecca Defence Agreement significant, and their efforts credible. They are also complimentary in terms of what they can bring to the process that they are about to start.Pakistan and Turkiye have large and developed standing armiies; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; Turkiye has a dynamic and expanding arms industry; Saudi Arabia has financial resources, and extensive diplomatic kudos in the Islamic world and beyond. The official statement announcing the new agreement said: “Guided by the longstanding historical ties among the three states, based on the enduring bonds of brotherhood and Islamic solidarity that unite them, and building upon their shared strategic interests and longstanding defense cooperation, HRH the Crown Prince, the President of Türkiye, and the Prime Minister of Pakistan signed the Makkah Joint Defence Agreement, reflecting the three states' shared commitment to further strengthening their collective security and to promoting peace, security, and stability in the region and beyond, in pursuit of a secure and prosperous future. The agreement is intended to strengthen collective deterrence against any act of aggression, and stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all. It further provides for the enhancement of all aspects of defense cooperation among the three states”. Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan said that the pact would function similar to NATO, with a minister's committee, political and military committees, and a permanent secretariat to oversee the implementation of decisions. The permanent general secretariat is expected to be based in Saudi Arabia.

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)