Armenian parliament to debate bill on recognising Nagorno-Karabakh independence

The Armenian government gave its approval on Thursday to debate a bill that would recognize the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic as independent. Similar bills have been proposed before, but were blocked by the government for fear they will interfere with the delicate peace process.

The development comes two days after Shavarsh Kocharyan, Armenia’s deputy foreign minister, said recognition is a possibility. “If Azerbaijan unleashes new military aggression, the recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh will be included in the agenda,” Kocharyan told journalists.

Current peace talks take place under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group, chaired by Russia, France and the United States. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said on Wednesday it was important not to "sound alarm and panic" about the prospect of Nagorno-Karabakh's independence being recognised.

"When I was in Yerevan last time and then, when I talked with my Armenian colleague on the phone, and later, when he was in Moscow after the escalation on the line of contact in Karabakh in early April, the official Yerevan reconfirmed its commitment to a peaceful settlement," said Lavrov in an interview with the RIA Novosti TV channel.

"This means that the status of Karabakh will be determined in the context of an overall agreement and not unilaterally," he said in response to deputy foreign minister Kocharyan's comments. 

The United States said on Friday it does not recognise Nagorno-Karabakh as independent. "We urge the sides to come to the negotiating table in good faith in order to reach a settlement that achieves [a comprehensive settlement]," said State Department spokesman Mark Toner.

The proposed Minsk Group settlement is set out by the “Madrid Principles”, which suggest giving an interim status to Nagorno-Karabakh, and linking it by land to Armenia. Independence for Nagorno-Karabakh would not be acceptable to Azerbaijan.

Earlier this week, Novruz Mammadov, deputy head of the Azerbaijan presidential administration, called the move by Armenian parliamentarians a "provocation".

"Their main goal was to use this as a pretext to spoil the negotiation process and perpetuate the status-quo," he said. "The Armenian side has once again proved that international law, UN Security Council resolutions and the negotiation process are of no value to them."

The bill was submitted by opposition lawmakers Zarui Postanjan and Grant Bagratyan. The government’s decision to debate it was “conditioned by discussions between Armenia and Karabakh, taking external and internal factors into account,” Kocharyan said on Thursday.

On April 2 fierce fighting broke out, the worst in two decades, with many soldiers and civilians killed on both sides. A verbal ceasefire agreement, brokered by Russia, was reached on April 5. However sporadic fighting has continued every night since then, with several casualties.

SOURCE: commonspace.eu and agencies

PHOTO: Karabakh flag

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
United States and Iran on the verge of agreement to end hostilities

United States and Iran on the verge of agreement to end hostilities

Updated on 13 June at 1330 CEST=========================== Source quoting Pakistani prime minister Shehbaz Sharif, says the text of a Memorandum between the US and Iran has been agreed, and is likely to be signed in the next 24 hours. Iranian sources are saying that the Memorandum is likely to be signed remotely. ==================== The United States and Iran signaled on Friday that an agreement to end their war was close, with a senior U.S. administration official saying both sides had agreed on a text and that Washington ​expects to sign an initial deal in the coming days. There are reports that the two sides will meet in Geneva in the coming 3-4 days. iAccording to the BBC, the agreement  includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Iran's Foreign Minister has said. Seyed Abbas Araghchi told state TV the deal also includes the lifting of a US blockade of Iran, but that talks on Iran's nuclear programme would begin later. US officials have confirmed some of the details of the agreement, saying economic benefits for Iran would depend on Tehran meeting its obligations. The war began with US and Israeli strikes across Iran on 28 February, prompting Iran to attack Israel and US-allied states in the Gulf - as well as effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz, a key shipping route for the world's oil and liquefied gas. Trump says there is "no such thing as dealing in good faith" when it comes to negotiating with the Iranians Despite having agreed a ceasefire in April, the US and Iran have exchanged intermittent fire, including two rounds of tit-for-tat strikes this week. US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that he had cancelled "scheduled attacks" against Iran, because negotiators had "just made a great settlement" - a deal that was likely be to signed imminently. On Friday, Iranian media published some details from the alleged 14-point deal which Trump said had "nothing to do with the terms that were agreed to" and "bears no relation to the truth".

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)