Armenian parliament to debate bill on recognising Nagorno-Karabakh independence

The Armenian government gave its approval on Thursday to debate a bill that would recognize the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic as independent. Similar bills have been proposed before, but were blocked by the government for fear they will interfere with the delicate peace process.

The development comes two days after Shavarsh Kocharyan, Armenia’s deputy foreign minister, said recognition is a possibility. “If Azerbaijan unleashes new military aggression, the recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh will be included in the agenda,” Kocharyan told journalists.

Current peace talks take place under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group, chaired by Russia, France and the United States. Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov said on Wednesday it was important not to "sound alarm and panic" about the prospect of Nagorno-Karabakh's independence being recognised.

"When I was in Yerevan last time and then, when I talked with my Armenian colleague on the phone, and later, when he was in Moscow after the escalation on the line of contact in Karabakh in early April, the official Yerevan reconfirmed its commitment to a peaceful settlement," said Lavrov in an interview with the RIA Novosti TV channel.

"This means that the status of Karabakh will be determined in the context of an overall agreement and not unilaterally," he said in response to deputy foreign minister Kocharyan's comments. 

The United States said on Friday it does not recognise Nagorno-Karabakh as independent. "We urge the sides to come to the negotiating table in good faith in order to reach a settlement that achieves [a comprehensive settlement]," said State Department spokesman Mark Toner.

The proposed Minsk Group settlement is set out by the “Madrid Principles”, which suggest giving an interim status to Nagorno-Karabakh, and linking it by land to Armenia. Independence for Nagorno-Karabakh would not be acceptable to Azerbaijan.

Earlier this week, Novruz Mammadov, deputy head of the Azerbaijan presidential administration, called the move by Armenian parliamentarians a "provocation".

"Their main goal was to use this as a pretext to spoil the negotiation process and perpetuate the status-quo," he said. "The Armenian side has once again proved that international law, UN Security Council resolutions and the negotiation process are of no value to them."

The bill was submitted by opposition lawmakers Zarui Postanjan and Grant Bagratyan. The government’s decision to debate it was “conditioned by discussions between Armenia and Karabakh, taking external and internal factors into account,” Kocharyan said on Thursday.

On April 2 fierce fighting broke out, the worst in two decades, with many soldiers and civilians killed on both sides. A verbal ceasefire agreement, brokered by Russia, was reached on April 5. However sporadic fighting has continued every night since then, with several casualties.

SOURCE: commonspace.eu and agencies

PHOTO: Karabakh flag

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)