We support those working on the front line of the war on coronavirus

Health and care workers are operating at exceptionally high levels to keep the COVID-19 pandemic under control. On UN World Health Day 2020, William Murray speaks to three healthcare professionals about how to take the pressure off those currently working on the frontline.

As we mark UN World Health Day, it's especially important that we acknowledge the hard work being done by all those working in healthcare during the current pandemic.  Whether you are living with a healthcare worker, working within government, or simply trying to do your bit from home, there are a number of things that you can do to mitigate stress at this difficult time.

Speaking in a personal capacity, Dr Kirsty Licence, a Consultant in Public Health based in Scotland, emphasised that a "little recognition after a long day's work goes a very long way". Dr Licence reminded Commonspace.eu that health and care workers are having to deal professionally and emotionally in abnormally high stress environments with a heightened number of deaths, whilst at the same time worrying about their own nearest and dearest. Dr Licence said that she believes managing uncertainty is the most stressful aspect of the current crisis:

"Everybody is working in an environment where we don't know all the answers. We know some of the answers - and in healthcare, you are always working with a little bit of uncertainty - but at present, the level of uncertainty is magnified."

She provided a number of considerations for those living with health and care workers to keep in mind:

-          It is important to allow them that little bit of time for recuperation when they get home. Think about how you can make that space around someone as relaxed as possible after a long and tiring day.

-          Some of them will want to talk about stressful things that have happened at work whereas others will prefer to keep it to themselves.

-          "Being physically looked after is important, but it is also important to acknowledge that a lot of people find pleasure in routine tasks like cooking." We must be sensitive of the different ways people will handle their stress.

In addition, Dr Licence argued that "care is a huge continuum" and that stress is not limited to the doctors and nurses on 'the frontline':

"Intensive Treatment Unit [ITU] professionals are very much in the spotlight, but there is a huge army of community and social care workers that are sustaining the vast majority of people at home, and looking after people that are very vulnerable... this is a huge group of often underpaid people, who are rarely as thanked or appreciated as those working in different settings."

She summarised by saying:

"I think that overall it's very difficult for people to sustain such a very emotional and physical intensity of work without a level of appreciation and recognition."

Separately, Dr Anne van Leeuwen, an Accident and Emergency specialist based in The Hague, noted that his A&E department had been especially quiet since the spread of the virus. He is concerned that people may be scared to go to the doctor even when they are in need serious of medical attention, fearing that they will put additional stress on the healthcare system. Dr Van Leeuwen suggested that people shouldn't be afraid to seek normal medical attention if something is wrong with them, as "this could lead to big problems down the line".  By going to the doctor where necessary, people can avoid complications that would put further stress of healthcare providers.

In another conversation, Professor Allyson Pollock, Director of the Newcastle University Centre for Excellence in Regulatory Science, put the onus on leaders to relieve pressure on healthcare workers, telling Commonspace.eu that:

"I think people have been amazing...but [governments] are failing at some of the fundamental things that they should be doing and are within their power."

She argued that certain governments are not doing enough to follow guidelines, such as when people should be going back to work, which makes life more difficult for the healthcare sector:

 "If governments are not following the guidelines set by the WHO [World Health Organization], they need to be giving good reasons as to why not."

On behalf of Commonspace.eu, we would like to thank all those that are working in the health and social care sectors for keeping us safe at this very difficult time. It is essential that we do not forget that those working against the pandemic are not limited to doctors and nurses, and include essential ancillary workers, such as cleaners, janitors, secretarial staff and many others.

Note: All those referenced are speaking in a personal capacity.

 

sources: William Murray, LINKS Europe, Project Officer and Coordinator, commonspace.eu

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)