Unblocking the Caspian route for Turkmen gas

On 28 November, the official opening of the representative office of the Azerbaijani state oil company SOCAR in Ashgabat took place[1] within the framework of the visit of Azerbaijan’s Minister of Economy, Mikayil Jabbarov, to Turkmenistan. Speaking there, Mr. Jabbarov stated that this initiative “embodies belief in the long-term strengthening of SOCAR’s activity in Turkmenistan and implementation of the countries’ common interests in the energy sector”. A little earlier, at the 7th meeting of the Intergovernmental Commission on Economic Cooperation, both sides agreed to intensify cooperation in energy, oil and gas sectors, chemical industry, transport and communications, agriculture and food industry.

In fact, Turkmenistan had been already developing energy cooperation with Azerbaijan for quite some time. SOCAR is involved in implementing a number of projects in Turkmenistan, including developing the Dostlug field following the MoU signed by the parties in January 2021 after a protracted dispute on its ownership rights, transporting oil from Turkmenistan to international markets in transit through Azerbaijan via the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline, and a number of other areas. Dostlug's oil reserves, estimated at 50 million tons of oil, will be distributed at 30% for Azerbaijan and 70% for Turkmenistan[2]. Moreover, Ashgabat is involved in a trilateral gas swap agreement according to which it has been providing gas to the eastern part of Iran, who further delivers an equivalent amount to Azerbaijan[3]. In early June this year, Iran and Azerbaijan reportedly signed an agreement to double the volume of gas swap between them and Turkmenistan[4].

The latest event, beyond its importance for SOCAR, fits a trend for the Central Asian country, for decades considered one of the most closed countries in the world, towards modest attempts at opening up its economy. Western sanctions against Russia which caused a gradual halt to energy supply from Russia to Europe and swelling Russian gas supplies to China, once Turkmenistan’s almost-exclusive client, made Ashgabat face a new reality that challenged its longstanding economic model, resulting in a significant deterioration of living standards and social discontent. Against this background, the country had to start considering options for diversifying its gas export geography and attracting foreign investment. Thus, in November 2023 Turkmenistan agreed on a 5-year long swap contract with Iraq (through another swap deal with Iran) to export 9 bcm of its natural gas annually.

However, the real intrigue is whether the long-cherished idea of the Transcaspian pipeline, the link which would bring Turkmenistan’s gas cornucopia to European markets, will finally come to fruition after many years of aborted attempts and uncertainty. The idea which had been around since 1990’s, has been viewed by the regional powers, primarily Russia and Iran, with a strong suspicion since it was believed to bring Western interests to this region, do away with European energy dependence on Russia and increase Ashgabat’s leverage. The talks on implementing the Transcaspian pipeline failed multiple times, most recently in December 2022 when a breakthrough was expected from the trilateral meeting between the leaders of Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan and Türkiye ,but their concluding statement was disappointing.

However, the impact of the Russian sanctions triggered Brussels to bolster its efforts at persuading Ashgabat to accepting the Transcaspian project. In fact, Azerbaijan’s 2022 pledge to raise its gas export to the EU up to 20 bcm/year by 2027 already envisaged opportunities for the transit of gas from Turkmenistan. So, the second half of 2023 has brought a number of interesting developments.

On July 25, the MFA of Turkmenistan issued a statement openly endorsing the idea of laying the pipeline through the Caspian. This statement emphasized that relevant trilateral mechanisms with Baku and Brussels had been already established, and Ashgabat is willing to embrace the project “not just as economically and commercially sound, but also as an essential component of diversification of energy flows as a key condition for global energy security and sustainability”[5]. President Berdymukhamedov spoke about the significance of the Transcaspian pipeline with German Chancellor Scholz during his visit to Germany in October; on November 1, Turkmen Deputy Prime Minister Shakhym Abdrakhmanov reiterated that his country will not abandon the Trans-Caspian project[6].

Moreover, European interest in Turkmenistan is not confined to the hydrocarbons import. In October Turkmenistan’s Foreign Minister Meredow, discussed with European Commissioner for International Partnerships, Jutta Urpilainen, potential for enhancing energy cooperation, including production of hydrogen energy, methane emission reduction, and the conversion of natural gas[7]. The parties also discussed an opportunity for Ashgabat to invite German development agency GTZ to implement green energy-related projects in Turkmenistan.

So, the implementation of the Transcaspian project has a potential to re-draw the Eurasian energy map and dramatically increase the value of Azerbaijan as a transit hub, as well. Turkmenistan, with its 4th biggest gas reserves in the world, stands to capture some of Russia’s European gas markets and/or replace Russian exports to Turkiye, currently covering 40% of its consumption. Technical realization of the project in fact is not that difficult given that in 2015 Turkmenistan built a 700-km linear gas pipeline to the Caspian Sea coast starting in Galkynysh.  The existing pipeline project envisions supplying up to 30 bcm of Turkmen gas annually through Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Türkiye to the European market for at least 30 years. Moreover, building an interconnector between Turkmenistan’s and Azerbaijan’s fields in the Caspian which may be envisaged as the first step towards the Transcaspian, will require just $400 million of investment and may be completed in as little as four months[8].

Turkish energy regulator EPDK since the 1990’s has already been renovating 10-year licenses to the state gas importer Botas for importing up to 16 bcm/year of gas from Turkmenistan on the expectation that a pipeline would be built. However, two issues constitute major risks. The more immediate one is obtaining necessary funds for completing the works. This far, no energy major has unambiguously expressed their interest, so speaking in May this year, Azerbaijani President Aliyev had to emphasize that despite its commitment to this project, it would help on funding and called on the companies developing Turkmenistan’s gas fields and other international investors to join[9]. There are rumours that Emirati national company ADNOC, which in 2023 acquired a 30-% stake in Azerbaijan’s Absheron gas field, would be an investor but this has not yet materialized.

The second issue is related to the aforementioned irritation the Transcaspian pipeline has traditionally stirred among regional powers. The risk of active Russian efforts aimed at undermining its construction should not be discarded, as the explosion of the Nord Stream-2 pipeline in September 2022 emphasized the vulnerabilities faced by offshore cables. However, there may be some reasons why Moscow could be less worried about these prospects. The war in Ukraine has caused European dependence on the import of American LNG, so for Russia the prospect of Europe’s reorientation towards Turkmenistan may now look like a lesser evil. At the same time, Tehran may also view this perspective positively, since swap deals with Ashgabat have enabled the heavily sanctioned energy industry of the Islamic Republic to raise its profits. Currently, the potential for elevating gas swap supplies from Turkmenistan to Iran from 8 mcm to 20 mcm per day is being considered[10], emphasizing growing trust between the countries.

[1] https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/97012/

[2] https://interfax.com/newsroom/top-stories/97012/

[3] https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/azerbaijan-strengthens-economic-ties-with-turkmenistan-socar-opens-office-in-ashgabat-2023-11-30-0/

[4] ibid

[5] https://www.azernews.az/oil_and_gas/212702.html

[6] https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/turkmenistan-eu-explore-energy-collaboration-expansion-2023-10-27-0/

[7] https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/turkmenistan-eu-explore-energy-collaboration-expansion-2023-10-27-0/

[8] About — TRANS CASPIAN RESOURCES, INC (TCRI)

[9] https://eurasianet.org/turkmenistan-signals-major-change-in-energy-export-stance

[10] https://www.specialeurasia.com/2023/12/11/iran-turkmenistan-culture-ties/

 

source: Murad Muradov is the co-founder and deputy director of the Topchubashov Center in Baku, Azerbaijan. He graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree in International Relations from the Academy of Public Administration of the Republic of Azerbaijan (2011), a Master of Arts in Diplomacy and International Affairs from the Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy (2013) and a Master of Science in Comparative Politics from the London School of Economics (2015). He participated in a number of training programs, summer schools and fellowships both in Azerbaijan and abroad, including the John Smith Trust Fellowship for Wider Europe (2017). His areas of expertise cover British politics, security and geopolitics of post-Soviet countries and international political economy.
photo: Turkmen Gas production site (archive picture)
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Latest

Editor's choice
News
Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia

Lula wins fourth term in Brazil, Vucic loses in Serbia

In elections on both sides of the Atlantic, that are likely to have deep implications for their respective regions, one incumbent won, another lost. In Brazil, Latin America's biggest country, left-wing President Lula won a fourth term in office, defeating his right-wing challenger Flávio Bolsonaro. The 80-year-old, took just under 52% of the vote in a run-off on Sunday. Lula thanked cheering supporters in São Paulo and said he had defended Brazil's democracy. His opponent, Flavio Bolsonaro - who won the first round - says the result is "inexplicable" and called for it to be annulled. His father, ex-president Jair Bolsonaro, is currently serving a jail sentence under house arrest for plotting a coup after losing the last election. This election was bitterly fought - and it bucks a wider regional trend towards right-wing leaders. On the other side of the Atlantic, in Serbia, long-standing leader Aleksandar Vučić has admitted defeat to the student-led protest movement in snap parliamentary elections. "We still do not have final results... it is clear that we have lost these elections," the right-wing populist leader said as he conceded late on Sunday. Preliminary figures from Serbia's election commission indicated a record high turnout, which commentators had suggested would favour the student movement. Celebrations erupted after Vučić conceded. Vučić called the snap elections after two years of protests triggered by the collapse of a train station canopy in the city of Novi Sad, which killed 16 and was seen as emblematic of corruption and negligence. Both election results are going to have a deep impact on their respective regions.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)