Healthcare in Yemen: realities in wartime and prospects for peacetime

In this piece for commonspace.eu, Samar Al-tashi discusses the desperate current state of the healthcare system in wartime Yemen, and offers some prospects and recommendations for the healthcare system in peacetime, stressing its importance in the post-war reconstruction and rehabilitation process.

According to a World Bank policy note of April 2021 on Health, Nutrition and Population HNP operations in Yemen, only 50% of health facilities were fully functional, and over 80% of the population encountered significant challenges in reaching food, drinking water, and accessing healthcare services. All this and more is an expected outcome of the prolonged and ongoing armed conflict, economic decline, and institutional collapse that the country has been suffering for almost 8 years now.

Moreover, health-related disasters in Yemen have exceeded the capacity of the existing poor resources of the health sector and are now forming an extra burden on the limited capacities of this system. Almost 4 million people have been forced to flee their homes, 3.25 million are suffering from acute malnutrition, 5 million are at risk of famine, and 16.2 million are encountering food insecurity, as stated in the World Bank report for 2022.

The healthcare system in Yemen is an out-of-pocket system with consumers paying directly to care providers with little to no insurance coverage. This system is extremely reliant on external funding and the provision of health services is primarily done through implementing NGOs (local and international) for primary care. This is in addition to inefficient, incompetent private and public health organizations (hospitals, clinics, labs,...etc.) that mainly depend on development partners executing vertical health programs e.g. UNICEF.

The healthcare system in Yemen is divided according to the political situation in the country

Coupled with the ongoing war and the random destruction of many healthcare institutions all over the country, there is also the international siege that the country has been under since 2014. These factors and many others have hindered the ability to rebuild and reanimate the healthcare system in Yemen, especially in regions that are controlled by the Houthi rebels, who rebelled against the government, took the reins of power and became the de facto authority (DFA) in the north and central areas.

The situation in the rest of the country is no different. The fact that the Internationally Recognized Government (IRG) with all the decision-makers and stakeholders is situated outside the country, away from the actual reality of the situation inside the country, makes it even harder to compose suitable work plans and agendas to reconstruct what has been destroyed. 

In a similar manner, the healthcare system in Yemen is now divided according to the political situation in the country. Areas under the rule of IRG are facilitated by external support and international funds that are invested in some vertical health programs, such as medical camps that aid people with low socioeconomic status to visit clinics and be seen by doctors for complaints that are not urgent.

Nonetheless, this support is still not actually taking place, at least not as required. In other DFA-administered areas, the aid provided by the United Nations and other INGOs is limited as the DFA places restrictions on how humanitarian programs are implemented. Furthermore, the lack of awareness of the deteriorating healthcare system in the areas under their rule, make the IRG also guilty for the health inequalities that Yemeni people have been encountering all over the country. 

The health sector in Yemen is undermined by conspiracy theories and weakened by brain drain

Similarly, retrograde actions undertaken by politicians against Yemenis’ health reveal themselves in the current anti-vaccine campaigns that are conducted by the DFA in Sana’a and other cities under their control. They deliver widespread messages aimed at discouraging people from giving vaccines to their new-born babies and children under the pretext of conspiracy theories, and that vaccines are made by Zionists who seek to kill their children. This practice, aligned with other similar fallacies, is affecting the population’s health awareness and in fact reducing it, which in turn will finally lead to the deterioration of the general health status by the spreading of epidemics and other preventable diseases. 

Additionally, the health sector is experiencing a brain drain of personnel, namely doctors, nurses, and university professors. This is due to the deterioration of their living conditions and livelihoods, or as in some worse cases, as a result of sometimes even life-threatening persecution because of their political, regional, or even religious affiliations. The gross migration of healthcare personnel has negatively affected the capacity of the national health and education systems to overcome the challenges of this shortage, particularly in times of increasing demand on the health services.

Those challenges could be clearly seen during the Covid-19 pandemic when the massive number of cases were difficult to handle because of the under-equipped health facilities in rural as well as urban areas. Moreover, this scarcity has also affected the performance of trauma centers that were overloaded with injured victims of bombing, and later used to admit patients with Covid-19 infection. Again, in relation to the Covid-19 pandemic, the weaknesses in the Yemeni healthcare system were exposed by its inability to provide enough vaccine doses to immunize the healthcare personnel, let alone the population in general. 

Students must be trained properly, and mental healthcare must also be addressed

Equally important, medical students, the country’s future doctors, were also affected by all the above-mentioned factors and many others, including a poor economic situation and a worsening education system. Nowadays, universities and other educational institutes in Yemen are either destroyed by air strikes and civil armed confrontations, or under-equipped with human and non-human assets. This has obstructed the creation of a suitable environment for those students to be trained properly. Indeed, the final result of this was a weaker and unsustainable healthcare system that is understaffed and unable to keep up with the population’s needs either now or in the future.

Another dilemma is that mental health is given no weight or consideration in Yemeni society. According to a Cordaid report in 2021, only 46 psychiatrists are available across the country, with a rate of one psychiatrist for every 600,000 people. Additionally, the stigmatization of mental health issues represents a big barrier that prevents people with mental problems from tackling it when it is necessary. Superstitions, spiritual rituals, or harmful practices such as moxibustion instead play a leading role, and people tend to use them and believe in their efficacy rather than the professional and scientific services provided by psychiatrists and psychologists.

Currently, the simultaneous adversities that Yemenis are undergoing during the ongoing war - the Covid-19 pandemic, poverty, instability, and internal displacement on top of individuals’ own personal problems - have made raising awareness about mental health and facilitating its accessibility inevitable. Considering this a priority in the healthcare system is needed in the government’s peace and reconstruction agendas. 

It must also be mentioned that due to all the stated reasoning above, people with the luxury of monetary abundance, usually choose to travel abroad for treatment instead of receiving it in the national institutions. This migration costs people huge sums of money, which could be used and invested in the development of the national healthcare system instead of being sent abroad, especially during a global economic crisis and the deterioration of the Yemeni economy.

Image
a
World Health Organisation

Reconstruction Yemen's healthcare system will require transparent and professional governance at all levels

Saving this system and providing the necessary support to its therapeutic and educational institutes is fundamental help in taking the country out of its ongoing humanitarian crisis. This as well as all other steps after the war would never be possible without the essential and foundational need for all warring parties and sides of the conflict to sit at the same table to find ways of resolving the conflict, working together to end the war, cooperating to reconstruct the country’s infrastructure, restoring life and good governance to Yemen and its institutions.

Following a successful cessation of the current conflict, the reconstruction stage will require transparent and professional governance at all levels. Healthcare will be essential in rehabilitating the population and helping them regain their mental and physical well-being, and consequently become able to function and contribute to the rehabilitation and reconstruction process.

To achieve this goal, the healthcare system should be managed and monitored in accordance with international standards, making sure that it matches recognized protocols and follows the relevant laws that guarantee people proper and decent health services all over the country. For this purpose, a successful management network needs to be entirely based on relevant expertise, professional experiences, and knowledge, rather than political, tribal or religious affiliations as is the case currently. Moreover, the ongoing rampant corruption within the system needs to be uprooted so that responsible bodies are held accountable for any violations or breaches. 

 Practical steps to improve the healthcare system, besides establishing peace in the country, can include:

  • First and most importantly, monitoring and evaluation systems that can ensure the proper running of the healthcare system with multiple oversight at public, governmental, and international levels;
     
  • A management system that can put in place strategic plans to rebuild and develop the existing system and continuously follow up the execution of those plans. Furthermore, a successful management system must facilitate equal distribution of services between rural and urban regions.
     
  • Prioritising the needs of healthcare staff and increasing their wages so they can continue their professional development without jeopardising familial duties. Moreover, this policy should include the development of infrastructure and regulate the pharmaceutical market. All of this requires good coordination with other sectors and ministries in the government to enhance the functionality of the healthcare system.
     
  • Improvements in health education, for the general population, as well as for the medical staff in the health sector, are required and are as important as the material development of the infrastructure of the health system. In this regard, universities and health studies institutes should develop or adapt better curricula that are up-to-date and regulate education strategies to provide better theoretical and clinical learning experiences to students.
     
  • Additionally, one must raise awareness among people about health literacy through developing programs and training that can be introduced within the community by primary health professionals to people within their micro-environments. This should be one of the cornerstones that any future leadership of the healthcare system should consider. By investing in this area, by including them in the improvement process as contributors and not just as help receivers, the possibilities to improve the current general health status of the population become higher and more sustainable.
     
  • On a more professional level, a newly developed healthcare system should always consider the necessity of participation in scientific conferences and annual symposiums where healthcare forces can follow developments in the scientific community, whether it be knowledge, practices, or equipment and tools. This requires the presence in these events of the proper health experts who can execute tailor-made updates to keep the national system on par with international ones.

Yemen's healthcare system is a vital part of rebuilding the country after political and military peace is established 

Lastly, sustainability and building a more resilient system that can withstand any predicted future disasters, human or natural, are necessary. Measures in this regard should involve the independence of the healthcare system from all political affiliations, and to prevent non-medical professionals from influencing its structure and policy-making processes. The current practice which imposes religious or political agendas on doctors or healthcare institutions, must be prevented.

Moreover, some aspects of the tribal nature of Yemen’s social system have always formed an adverse influence on the whole healthcare structure. Threats and murder crimes against healthcare staff in some areas, where tribe leaders died in the hospitals, for example, is one representation of such risks. For this reason, supporting healthcare workers and protecting them has to be a priority for a sustainable system. 

Yemen's healthcare system is a vital part of rebuilding the country after political and military peace is established. This process should not necessarily be considered an impossible mission, but achieving it is going to be a long and complex journey, requiring a sufficient, efficient planning strategy, and commitment from all decision-makers to achieve the goal of a sustainable, equitable, and independent system that delivers the required preventive and curative health services to all Yemeni individuals all over the country.

source: Samar Al-tashi is an accomplished medical doctor and global health professional, with expertise in medicine and public health. She holds a Bachelor's degree in General Medicine and Surgery from Sana'a University in Yemen and a Master's degree in Global Health from Maastricht and Thammasat Universities. Samar is also a dedicated advocate for diversity and inclusivity, to that end, she has conducted research about Arab refugee doctors’ experiences with resuming their medical career in the Netherlands. She has participated in a number of medical and social events and cooperated with multiple initiatives and organizations that provide mental and social support to people with migration backgrounds, in particular, women in the Netherlands. She is deeply committed to advocating for peace and development in Yemen on both national and international levels.
photo: UNDP
The views expressed in opinion pieces and commentaries do not necessarily reflect the position of commonspace.eu or its partners

Latest

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Monday Commentary: PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Making peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan was never going to be simple, nor easy, nor quick. It is taking time, writes Dennis Sammut in this Monday Commentary. “There is a sense of realism coming from the leaders of the two countries – President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and prime minister Nikol Pashinyan of Armenia, that frankly, is necessary and welcome”, he writes. At a time when conflicts are raging all over the world – from Ukraine to the Gulf, from Africa to South Asia, the prospect that Armenia and Azerbaijan had finally, after decades of conflict that left thousands of dead and many more displaced, decided on embarking on a journey of peace was welcomed. Peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan can be top-down up to a point. Both leaders have spent political capital preparing for a peace deal. But both are aware that their people are not ready for peace yet. In fact, in Armenia, most of the elite are negative toward a peace deal with Azerbaijan. Pashinyan needs time to persuade his countryfolk. That is why 2031 is realistic. Ilham Aliyev runs a tighter shop, but he is also not immune to public opinion. Every time someone hits a landmine in Karabakh, which unfortunately happens often, peace comes into question. Which is why Aliyev chooses to sound hardline, more often than not. In pursuing the peace agenda, both Aliyev and Pashinyan need to proceed cautiously. But they are right in making peace the central issue in their agenda. It is the main issue, and the one that will define them in history. So forward, cautiously but resolutely! In pursuing the peace agenda, Aliyev and Pashinyan need to be supported clearly and unambiguously. There are too many people in Baku and Yerevan who are sitting on the sides, waiting. The international community is not doing enough. It is time to be counted. Otherwise, the spoilers will win, and the region will go back to its bad habits. (Click the image to read the full commentary).
Editor's choice
News
Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine Peace Talks Set to Expand as Russia and Europe Clash Over Post-war Security

Ukraine and Russia could see European countries join the next round of peace negotiations, following talks between US special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Thursday (November 12). However, conflicting positions over European military involvement, Ukraine’s territorial future and the continent’s security arrangements highlight the difficulties facing the diplomatic process. Speaking after the meeting, Witkoff said European participation would be an important development, describing the countries concerned as key partners. Kushner also indicated that Washington had noticed a shift in European attitudes and believed their involvement would not obstruct progress. In a statement published on X, he said the expanded discussions would address broader European security arrangements alongside territorial disputes between Russia and Ukraine. The US envoys subsequently travelled to Dublin, where they met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a European summit. Zelenskyy welcomed the possibility of European participation and expressed hope that the negotiations would include measures to reduce tensions and establish ceasefires. He also reiterated the importance of European representation in decisions concerning the continent’s security. Moscow, however, has offered a more cautious interpretation of the proposed expansion. Putin's aide, Yuri Ushakov, suggested that European countries should first reconsider their military assistance to Kyiv, arguing that their current actions demonstrated an unwillingness to pursue peace. Putin similarly called on Washington to work with its European allies to establish whether they genuinely wanted peace or continued confrontation with Russia. The Russian president also rejected the prospect of European peacekeeping troops being deployed to Ukraine following a potential agreement, describing such a presence as a continuation of the war. His position reflects wider disagreements over the future European security architecture, with Moscow seeking discussions on the continent's broader security arrangements, while European leaders insist that such negotiations cannot replace a settlement of the war. Simultaneously, Zelenskyy raised concerns about disruptions to Starshield, the US-made satellite communications service used by Ukrainian forces. He described Washington’s discussions with Moscow about Europe's future security as unusual and warned against decisions that could undermine Ukraine's sovereignty. Despite the diplomatic activity, fighting continued. Russian drone attacks killed two people in Ukraine's Sumy region and injured five in Rivne, while a separate attack in Russia's Belgorod region killed one person and injured four. Ukrainian agricultural company Kernel Holding also suspended operations at all its oilseed extraction facilities following repeated Russian attacks.

Popular

Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Monday Commentary: European-Azerbaijan relations need an intensive and multifaceted dialogue that is frank and honest

Last week I visited Baku, Azerbaijan. My visit was relatively short, but very intensive, and had many meetings with stakeholders and colleagues. When I arrived in Baku first time in 1996,  Azerbaijan was a different country: weak, poor, and shaken by defeat in war. For thirty year the Karabakh issue dominated the agenda: the political agenda but also the popular mindset. Now, thirty years later, Azerbaijan has returned to Karabakh, and peace with Armenia is on the horizon. It is a new era for Armenia-Azerbaijan relations, for the South Caucasus, but also for Europe.  But we cannot be complacent: the Peace agreement has been initialed but not signed; borders remain closed; TRIPP is ambitious but remains an idea; and there are spoilers who want to turn the clock back. We must not allow them, and in this Europe and Azerbaijan must work together. Europe’ vanguard organization is the European Union – it is a free union of 27 member states; it is a strong global economic force, and increasingly a diplomatic and military force too. But it remains “work in progress” and can often appear dysfunctional. It often lacks collective and institutional memory. In its dealings with Azerbaijan the EU has made many mistakes – not least opening the delegation here late – in 2008. It sometimes appears condescending. Some utterances from the European Parliament and from some quarters in some member states are not understandable even for me. They irritate the Azerbaijanis, but serve no other purpose But Azerbaijan has also not handled relations with the EU well. It has failed to respond when the hand of friendship reached out; and it confused irritating actions, sometimes by well-meaning people; sometimes by outright spoilers, with strategic action. In short, EU-Azerbaijan relations have suffered from a lack of proper dialogue. This dialogue must be frank, honest and multi-faceted involving different segments of society on both sides.   Is Azerbaijan Europe? When Azerbaijan applied to join the Council of Europe in the 1990s, there were some who opposed, saying this was not Europe. I was one of the people who argued that Armenia and Azerbaijan may be on the periphery of the continent geographically, but were European in essence. Certainly their elites. During the discussion on 4 September in Baku, my friend Farhad Mammedov, mentioned that Azerbaijan is not interested in joining the EU, and was now close to the Central Asian countries in the 5 plus 1 format. Neither things mean that Azerbaijan is not Europe. There are several European countries that are not in the EU, and do not want to be, for example Norway and Switzerland. Iceland has recently voted to stay out of the EU. The UK was a member and left. Europe is bigger than the EU, and the holding of the European Political Community summit in Baku in 2027 proves that. Despite all the rhetoric, I never heard the president of Azerbaijan  saying that Azerbaijan is not Europe, nor have I heard any European president say it either. Not wanting to join the EU and forging close relations with neighbouring regions does not make Azerbaijan any less European. It is only logical that when Europeans talk to Azerbaijan they talk like family. The conversation is often frank. It must also be honest, and Europeans need always to remember this too. A frank, honest and multi-faceted dialogue A frank, honest and multifaceted dialogue will contribute to relations between Azerbaijan and the rest of Europe: it will avoid misperception, which unfortunately is very common on both sides; it will provide a forum where problems can be discussed and resolved, and it will increase mutual trust, so that together common problems can be addressed. (click image to read the full Monday Commentary)
Editor's choice
Monday Commentary
Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

Monday Commentary: “The barren rocks of Aden” and “These lands of Yemen are so ruthless”

There are two early 20th-century tunes that mark foreign attempts to occupy and “pacify” Yemen. The Scottish tune “The barren rocks of Aden” marks the mobilisation of Highland soldiers, enlisted to be deployed to the Yemeni port of Aden, that in 1837 became the last colony to be incorporated into the British Empire. The tune talks of the harshness of the terrain, but is celebratory, It was even played as a farewell tune to Sir William Luce at the parade in Sharjah celebrating his end as “British Viceroy” in the Middle East in 1966. The second tune is an Anatolian lament. As Ilker Sezer reminded us this weekend, in his weekly feature on “Turkiye Today”, it “mourns the tragic fate of Ottoman soldiers dispatched to the harsh, remote deserts of Yemen during the fall of the empire, young men who marched away from their villages and never returned home. Most of their names, and numbers, were never recorded. Yet, their fate left a mark on the Turkish psyche.” Subsequent invaders have discovered that Yemen is a grave that cannot be overcome by the strength of modern technology, and that whilst Yemeni society is splintered and divided, building a reliable alliance with Yemeni factions is difficult. These are the harsh lessons facing Saudi Arabia, as the Kingdom faces its biggest challenge in its modern history. The leadership of the Kingdom now has to respond decisively. At stake is their very credibility. This is likely to be a long and messy conflict. Saudi military objectives need to be focused: to box in the Houthis rather than destroy them. This is likely to include: (a) regaining territory lost on the Red Sea coast; (b) control over Bab el Mandeb Strait; (c) some kind of cordon sanitaire on the Saudi-Yemeni border; and if things go well (d) the capture of Sanaa. All this would not eliminate the Houthi problem, but it will contain it. In the end the Saudis will have to continue managing Yemen with a mixture of carrot and stick. For the moment, the stick is likely, but the carrot cannot be forgotten either. (click the image to read the Monday Commentary in full)