"We Have a Right to Know the TRUTH about the death of our children!"

Parents of Armenian army recruits who died in recent years are concerned that they are not being told the truth about the circumstances of the deaths. The NGO "Peace Dialogue" is leading a campaign for more information. Edgar Khachtryan writes from Vanadzor for commonspace.eu

The Armenian NGO "Peace Dialogue" has launched a video campaign called "We Have a Right to Know the TRUTH!" The campaign consists of a series 30-second video-interviews with members of the families of soldiers who died in the Armenian Army in non-combat conditions. The focus of the videos is to allow the relatives to express their right to know what happened to their sons, husbands and brothers. We have found in our work documenting these deaths in the Safe Soldiers for a Safe Armenia project that many families do not believe the version of the "fatal accidents" that resulted in the death of their family members that is often the official explanation of the deaths given to families.

According to several civil society groups, more than 200 soldiers have died in the Armenian Military during the last five years (For more information see www.safesoldiers.am). Many died as a result of violations of the cease-fire regime signed between Armenian and Azerbaijanis in 1994 after the Nagorno-Karabakh war. However, during these same years many others died as a result of other internal issues: suicides, murders, fatal incidents or because of lack of access to medical service in their military units.

At the end of 2014, "Peace Dialogue" filed a lawsuit in order to obtain information on the fatalities of persons serving in the military from the Ministry of Defense in Armenia (MoD). The Administrative Court of the Republic of Armenia (RA) has now decided to allow the lawsuit to proceed and will soon hold hearings on two cases related to this most important issue. 

The first case would oblige the Ministry of Defense to provide information including; the full names of the deceased soldiers, the location of the incident, the date, unit number, unit commander's full name and title, the cause of death and all other publicly available information. The second part of the lawsuit calls for administrative penalties against Defence Minister Seyran Ohanyan for ignoring the requests to provide this information, as his Ministry is required to do under Armenian law.

Recently two state institutions: the MoD and the General Prosecutor's office refused to provide related information to other civil society groups on this issue. They justified their refusal, by explaining that the required information is classified, was not to be published and could only be viewed with restricted access.

"Peace Dialogue" argues that the required information should not be classified, as it does not fall under the restrictions prescribed in the RA legislation. Furthermore, the MoD had previously provided the same information to "Peace Dialogue"  for the time period of 2010 to 2011. Apart from that, some of the information requested by "Peace Dialogue" is already being released   by the MoD in its own press releases and public statements. The Armenian legislation prescribes that even in cases when the inquiry contains classified information, the officials are still obliged to provide the rest of the information, which was not what happened in this situation.

A number of cases have been recorded by "Peace Dialogue" and other watchdog groups in Armenia, which clearly show that sometimes the official version does not reflect what really happened. "Peace Dialogue" argues that investigative bodies have violated legal procedures during the preliminary investigation or/and judicial processes. In some cases civil society oversight of the military, made it possible to reach a reasonable resolution of the issues.

The "We Have a Right to Know the TRUTH!" campaign aims at increasing public accessibility to information regarding the fatal casualties in the army. "Peace Dialogue" believes that this accessibility will help form public demand for more transparency in order to prevent additional illegalities and falsifications of the investigations in the Armenian Army.

Source: Edgar Khachtryan contributed this article to commonspace.eu

Photo: The Armenian Army on parade. Parents of army recruits who died in recent years are however concerned that they are not being told the truth about the circumstances of the deaths (archive picture).

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

Israeli parliament votes to bring back the death penalty, but only for Palestinians

srael’s parliament approved a bill on Monday that would allow the execution of Palestinians convicted on terror charges for deadly attacks, a move that has been criticized as discriminatory and immediately drew a court challenge. Sixty-two lawmakers, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, voted in favor and 48 against the bill, championed by far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir. There was one abstention and the rest of the lawmakers were not present. Ben Gvir in the run-up to the vote had worn a lapel pin in the shape of a noose, symbolising his support for the legislation. “We made history!!! We promised. We delivered,” he posted on X after the vote. The bill would make the death penalty the default punishment for Palestinians in the Israeli-occupied West Bank found guilty of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed “acts of terrorism” by an Israeli military court. The bill says that the sentence may be reduced to life imprisonment under “special circumstances.” Palestinians in the West Bank are automatically tried in Israeli military courts. Meanwhile, under the bill, in Israeli criminal courts anyone “who intentionally causes the death of a person with the aim of harming an Israeli citizen or resident out of an intention to put an end to the existence of the State of Israel shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment.” Criminal courts try Israeli nationals, including Palestinian citizens and residents of east Jerusalem. The bill sets the execution method as hanging, adding that it should be carried out within 90 days of the sentencing, with a possible postponement of up to 180 days. - ‘Parallel tracks’ - The bill appears to conflict with Israel’s Basic Laws, which prohibit arbitrary discrimination, and shortly after it was passed, a leading human rights group announced that it had filed a petition with the Supreme Court demanding the legislation’s annulment. “The law creates two parallel tracks, both designed to apply to Palestinians,” the Association for Civil Rights in Israel said in a statement. “In military courts — which have jurisdiction over West Bank Palestinians — it establishes a near-mandatory death sentence,” the rights group said. In civilian courts, the law’s stipulation that defendants must have acted “with the aim of negating the existence” of Israel “structurally excludes Jewish perpetrators,” the group added. The association argued the law should be annulled on both jurisdictional and constitutional grounds. During the debate in parliament, opposition lawmaker and former deputy Mossad director, Ram Ben Barak, expressed outrage at the legislation. “Do you understand what it means that there is one law for Arabs in Judea and Samaria, and a different law for the general public for which the State of Israel is responsible?” he asked fellow parliamentarians, using the Israeli name for the West Bank. “It says that Hamas has defeated us. It has defeated us because we have lost all our values.” - ‘Discriminatory application’ - Lawmaker Limor Son Har-Melech from Ben Gvir’s party, who years ago survived an attack by Palestinian militants in which her husband was killed, urged fellow parliamentarians to approve the bill. “For years, we endured a cruel cycle of terror, imprisonment, release in reckless deals, and the return of these human monsters to murder Jews again ... And today, my friends, this cycle has come full circle.” The Palestinian Authority condemned the law’s adoption, saying that “Israel has no sovereignty over Palestinian land.” “This law once again reveals the nature of the Israeli colonial system, which seeks to legitimize extrajudicial killing under legislative cover,” it added. In February, Amnesty International had urged Israeli lawmakers to reject the legislation, citing its “discriminatory application against Palestinians.” On Sunday, Britain, France, Germany and Italy expressed “deep concern” over the bill, which they said risked “undermining Israel’s commitments with regards to democratic principles.” While the death penalty exists for a small number of crimes in Israel, it has become a de facto abolitionist country — the Nazi Holocaust perpetrator Adolf Eichmann was the last person to be executed in 1962. Israel has occupied the West Bank since 1967 and violence there has soared since Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. (read more by clicking the image above).

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)