Sargsyan "withdraws" Turkey protocols from National Assembly.

The President of Armenia,  Serzh Sargsyan, has formally withdrawn from the consideration of the country's parliament the protocols that his country had signed with Turkey in 2009, and which were meant to open a new chapter in the troubled relations between the two countries. The protocols were signed by the Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Turkey in Zurich on 10 October 2009 following long negotiations, mostly held in secret. After the signing it became clear that both sides came under intense pressure from different interest groups not to proceed with the raftification of the agreements that among other things provided for the establishment of diplomatic relations and the opening of borders. Azerbaijan, which had insisted that there should be no normalisation of Turkish relations with Armenia unless there was progress in the Karabakh conflict settlment process had also reacted sharply to the signing, threatening to downgrade its relations with Turkey. Turkey subsequently deferred the ratification of the protocols. In Armenia, and especially amongst Armenian communities in the diaspora the protocols were also negatively evaluated.

In his letter to the Chairman of the Armenian Parliament President Sargsyan said that in the six years since the protocols were signed, Armenia has always had a consistent position on the implementation of the protocols.

"However, we must admit the lack of political will of the Turkish authorities, the distortion of the letter and spirit of protocols and consistent denial. Parallel to this, on the eve of the 100th anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, denial policy and 'adjustment' of history gets a new dimension," the President said. The Armenian leader said he regretted that the Turkish authorities turned a deaf ear to Armenia's calls.

Commonspace.eu political editor said that "the move to withdraw the protocols from the consideration of the Armenian Parliament was a purely symbolic one. The protocols have long since been considered dead, at least in their present format. As Armenian prepares to mark the 100 th anniversary of the atoricities against Armenians in Anatolia in 1915, characterised as the Armenian Genocide, the withdrawal of the protocols is a further mark of Armenian displeasure. However the reasons why Armenia wanted to sign the protocols in the first place remain the same. The country faces serious economic challenges and the opening of the border with Turkey is considered an important part of addressing these challenges. Nothing much will happen in this centenial year but it is likely the two sides will maintain channels of communication open in order to re-visit the subject at a politically more convenient time."


source: commonspace.eu with agencies

photo: Signing of the Armenian-Turkish Protocols in Zurich on 10 October 2009. (archive picture).

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell tells the European Parliament that the situation in Afghanistan was critical, but the EU will remain engaged

Borrell underlined that the European Union will make every effort to support the peace process and to remain a committed partner to the Afghan people. "Of course, we will have to take into account the evolving situation, but disengagement is not an option.  We are clear on that: there is no alternative to a negotiated political settlement, through inclusive peace talks.
Editor's choice
News
NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

Russia could attack a Nato country within the next five years, the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, said in a stark new warning. "Nato's own defences can hold for now," Rutte warned in Berlin, but conflict was "next door" to Europe and he feared "too many are quietly complacent, and too many don't feel the urgency, too many believe that time is on our side. "Russia is already escalating its covert campaign against our societies," Rutte said in a speech in Germany. "We must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured." Earlier this month, Russia's President Vladimir Putin said his country was not planning to go to war with Europe, but it was ready "right now" if Europe wanted to - or started a war. But similar reassurances were given by Moscow in 2022, just before 200,000 Russian troops crossed the border and invaded Ukraine. Putin has accused European countries of hindering US efforts to bring peace in Ukraine - a reference to the role Ukraine's European allies have recently played in trying to change a US peace plan to end the war, whose initial draft was seen as favouring Russia. But Putin was not sincere, Nato's secretary-general said in the German capital, Berlin. Supporting Ukraine, he added, was a guarantee for European security. "Just imagine if Putin got his way; Ukraine under the boot of Russian occupation, his forces pressing against a longer border with Nato, and the significantly increased risk of an armed attack against us." Russia's economy has been on a war footing for more than three years now - its factories churn out ever more supplies of drones, missiles and artillery shells. According to a recent report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Russia has been producing each month around 150 tanks, 550 infantry fighting vehicles, 120 Lancet drones and more than 50 artillery pieces. The UK, and most of its Western allies, are simply not anywhere near this point. Analysts say it would take years for Western Europe's factories to come close to matching Russia's mass-production of weapons. "Allied defence spending and production must rise rapidly, our armed forces must have what they need to keep us safe," the Nato chief said.

Popular

Editor's choice
News
NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

NATO Chief says war is on Europe's doorstep, and warns against complacency

Russia could attack a Nato country within the next five years, the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Rutte, said in a stark new warning. "Nato's own defences can hold for now," Rutte warned in Berlin, but conflict was "next door" to Europe and he feared "too many are quietly complacent, and too many don't feel the urgency, too many believe that time is on our side. "Russia is already escalating its covert campaign against our societies," Rutte said in a speech in Germany. "We must be prepared for the scale of war our grandparents or great-grandparents endured." Earlier this month, Russia's President Vladimir Putin said his country was not planning to go to war with Europe, but it was ready "right now" if Europe wanted to - or started a war. But similar reassurances were given by Moscow in 2022, just before 200,000 Russian troops crossed the border and invaded Ukraine. Putin has accused European countries of hindering US efforts to bring peace in Ukraine - a reference to the role Ukraine's European allies have recently played in trying to change a US peace plan to end the war, whose initial draft was seen as favouring Russia. But Putin was not sincere, Nato's secretary-general said in the German capital, Berlin. Supporting Ukraine, he added, was a guarantee for European security. "Just imagine if Putin got his way; Ukraine under the boot of Russian occupation, his forces pressing against a longer border with Nato, and the significantly increased risk of an armed attack against us." Russia's economy has been on a war footing for more than three years now - its factories churn out ever more supplies of drones, missiles and artillery shells. According to a recent report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Russia has been producing each month around 150 tanks, 550 infantry fighting vehicles, 120 Lancet drones and more than 50 artillery pieces. The UK, and most of its Western allies, are simply not anywhere near this point. Analysts say it would take years for Western Europe's factories to come close to matching Russia's mass-production of weapons. "Allied defence spending and production must rise rapidly, our armed forces must have what they need to keep us safe," the Nato chief said.