The return of Samuel Babayan to Nagorno-Karabakh

This is a commentary prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu

The return on Sunday to Nagorno-Karabakh of war-lord cum war hero, General Samuel Babayan, is probably the most important political development in the territory in the last decade.

Babayan, who was one of the leaders of the military campaign fought against Azerbaijani in the early 1990s, subsequently became Minister of Defence of the self-declared Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR), and for several years held huge power in the territory. He was fired from the post by NKR president Arkadi Ghoukasian, and was subsequently accused of being behind a car bomb that nearly killed the president. He was arrested in 2000 and subsequently sentenced to 14 years in prison.   He was set free in 2004 and lived in Yerevan until moving to Moscow in 2011 where he has been living in self-imposed exile.

Babayan's return to Nagorno-Karabakh is a direct challenge not only to the current leadership in the self-declared republic, but also to the Armenian president Serzh Sargsyan, and there is speculation that Babayan may be joining political forces that aim to unseat Sargsyan.

Radio Liberty's Armenian service reported from Stepanakert that on his return on Sunday 'the hardline general was greeted by about a thousand people when he laid flowers at a Stepanakert memorial to Karabakh Armenians killed during the 1991-1994 war with Azerbaijan. The crowd, quite large by Karabakh standards, then escorted him to his old apartment, applauding and chanting "Samvel!" The impromptu procession blocked traffic through major streets in the Karabakh capital. "I will do everything in my power to ensure that your security is properly protected," Babayan told the supporters at the war memorial. But he did not clarify how he will do that, again insisting that he has no political ambitions.'

Radio Liberty further reported that 'Speaking to journalists, Babayan said he is ready to hold "discussions" with Karabakh's political and military leaders. But he stressed that no meetings with them have been scheduled yet.'

Babayan's return is far from universally welcome however. Armenia's leading blogger and political analyst Richard Giragosian wrote on his facebook page,

"After a record of corruption and a reputation for authoritarian abuse of power, the return from disgrace and an end to self-imposed exile in Moscow exile affirms that the return of this "warlord" to Karabakh is an ominous sign of the mounting degree of distress within Karabakh".

The population of Nagorno-Karabakh was rattled in April when the territory seemed to be under threat for the first time in decades as a result of an escalation in the fighting on the line of contact separating Armenian and Azerbaijani forces. Political leaders of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh had long assured the population that they had the situation on the line of contact under control. But it subsequently emerged that an influx of new armaments from Russia and Israel had given the Azerbaijani forces an opportunity to inflict serious damage on their Armenian opponents. Some small amount of territory was lost to Azerbaijan during the fighting in April, but more seriously the Armenian claim of military superiority and invincibility was broken. Amid ongoing soul-searching in the Armenian military, which has already resulted in the dismissal of a number of senior generals, Babayan has added insult to injury by warning against complacency and saying that this may lead to the Azerbaijanis ending up drinking coffee in Yerevan.

Babayan may lack the necessary huge popular support, and more importantly support within the Armenian military elite, to present an existential challenge to the current leadership in Yerevan, and its allies in Stepanakert. But his presence and his vocal outbursts at an awkward time for President Sargsyan will not be welcomed. The Armenian political scene, and by extension that in Nagorno-Karabakh, is already under considerable pressure. Babayan's presence will most certainly add some more.

Source: This commentary was prepared by the political editor of commonspace.eu.

Photo: Samuel Babayan addressing supporters in Stepanakert on Sunday, 5 May 2016 following his return from self-imposed exile in Moscow. (picture courtesy of RFE/RL).

 

 

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

Key European countries back Denmark in the face of Trump's continuing insistence on taking over Greenland

 Six major European countries have declared their support to Denmark following renewed insistence by the US that it must have control over Greenland. "Greenland belongs to its people, and only Denmark and Greenland can decide on matters concerning their relations," said the leaders of the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain, in a joint statement, issued on Tuesday (6 January), together with Denmark. On Sunday, Donald Trump said the US "needed" Greenland - a semi-autonomous region of fellow Nato member Denmark - for security reasons. He has refused to rule out the use of force to take control of the territory, and Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen warned on Monday that an attack by the US would spell the end of Nato. The issue of Greenland's future resurfaced in the wake of the US military intervention in Venezuela, during which elite troops went in to seize the country's President Nicolás Maduro and take him to face drugs and weapons charges in New York. Following the raid, Trump said the US would "run" Venezuela for an unspecified period of time. He also said the US was returning to an 1823 policy of US supremacy in its sphere of influence in the Western hemisphere - and he warned a number of countries the US could turn its attention to them. The US military raid in Venezuela has reignited fears that the US may consider using force to secure control of Greenland. A day after the raid, Katie Miller - the wife of one of Trump's senior aides - posted on social media a map of Greenland in the colours of the American flag, alongside the word "SOON". On Monday, her husband Stephen Miller said it was "the formal position of the US government that Greenland should be part of the US". In an interview with CNN, he also said the US "is the power of Nato. For the US to secure the Arctic region, to protect and defend Nato and Nato interests, obviously Greenland should be part of the US." Asked repeatedly whether the US would rule out using force to annex it, Miller responded: "Nobody's going to fight the US over the future of Greenland." Stressing they were as keen as the US in Arctic security, the seven European signatories of Tuesday's joint statement said this must be achieved by Nato allies, including the US "collectively" - whilst "upholding the principles of the UN Charter, including sovereignty, territorial integrity and the inviolability of borders". Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen welcomed the statement and called for "respectful dialogue". "The dialogue must take place with respect for the fact that Greenland's status is rooted in international law and the principle of territorial integrity," Nielsen said. Trump has claimed that making Greenland part of the US would serve American security interests due to its strategic location and its abundance of minerals critical to high-tech sectors. Greenland, which has a population of 57,000 people, has had extensive self-government since 1979, though defence and foreign policy remain in Danish hands. While most Greenlanders favour eventual independence from Denmark, opinion polls show overwhelming opposition to becoming part of the US.

Popular