Remembering the 1992 Khojaly Massacre - an editorial comment

In the modern history of the Caucasus region there are many examples of pain and suffering caused by conflict and ethnic strife. The events in Khojaly in 1992 stand out both for their cruelty, as well as for the fact that they happened on the eve of the 21st century, when information travelled fast, and the world had no excuses that it did know what was going on.

On the night of 25-26 February 1992 hundreds of Azerbaijani civilians, including women and children were killed as they were trying to leave from the town of Khojaly, that was just about to fall under Armenian occupation. Foreign journalists that visited the scene soon after speak about dozens of bodies littering the roads. It remains one of the most tragic chapters of the long and bloody Karabakh conflict. The anniversary of the massacre is marked not only in Azerbaijan but also among many communities world-wide.

The massacre was documented by a number of human rights organisations, including Human Rights Watch and Memorial, as well as a number of journalists, some of who wrote graphic reports about it in the mainstream western and Russian media.

Some Armenian sources justify what happened in Khojaly, claiming that armed men were hiding among the civilians fleeing Khojaly. But others accept that the Khojaly massacre was an act of revenge against earlier killings of Armenian civilians in Azerbaijan. 

Civilian populations, both Azerbaijani and Armenian, remain captive of the Karabakh conflict. They suffer both as a result of the fighting that erupts regularly, but beyond that hundreds of thousands remain displaced, and communities in the conflict zone live in constant fear.

The world must remember Khojaly in order to ensure that it will never happen again to any community regardless of its ethnicity. The governments of Armenia and Azerbaijan should also take steps in this direction by signing and ratifying the statutes of the International Criminal Court to make it possible to prosecute those who commit similar atrocities in the future. The international community should increase its efforts to bring about a resolution of the Karabakh conflict, and open a new chapter of hope for the people of the region. In that way the victims of Khojaly would not have died in vaiin.

This comment was prepared by the editorial team of commonspace.eu

Related articles

Editor's choice
News
Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

Women emerge favourite to lead United Nations from next year, after straw-poll of UN Security Council members

​ Two women have emerged as favourite to lead the United Nations as Secretary-General from 1 January 2027, when the term of the present incumbent, Antonio Gutteres, expires. A straw poll of the members of the UN Security Council, held on Thursday, 30 July showed that of the seven candidates, Rebecca Grynspan of Costa Rica and Carolyn Rodriguez-Birkett of Guyana received ten and nine positive endorsements respectively, by the 15 members UN Security Council Although the poll and its result are supposed to be secret, the result leaked within minutes, and was carried on world media outlets, such as Reuters. The result was as follows   Michelle Bachelet 6 encourage 5  discourage   4 no opinion María Fernanda Espinosa 5 2 8 Rafael Grossi 7 2 6 Rebeca Grynspan 10 1 4 Olara Otunnu 2 5 8 Carolyn Rodrigues-Birkett 9 2 4 Macky Sall 6 7 2   Article 97 of the UN Charter states that the “Secretary-General shall be appointed by the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council”. Straw polls are informal ballots used to determine the viability of Secretary-General candidates.  The seven current candidates are: Michelle Bachelet Jeria (Chile), who was nominated by Brazil, Chile, and Mexico on 2 February, with Chile withdrawing its nomination on 24 March; María Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (Ecuador), who was nominated by Antigua and Barbuda on 11 May; Rafael Mariano Grossi (Argentina), who was nominated by Argentina on 26 November 2025; Rebeca Grynspan Mayufis (Costa Rica), who was nominated by Costa Rica on 3 March; Olara Otunnu (Uganda), who was nominated by Uganda on 24 July; Carolyn Rodrigues Birkett (Guyana), who was nominated by Guyana on 15 June; and Macky Sall (Senegal), who was nominated by Burundi on 2 March. At Thursday's straw poll, there was no difference between the ballots presented to the five permanent members (P5) and the ten elected members (E10). Council members received one ballot per candidate, containing the candidate’s name followed by three options: “encouraged”, “discouraged”, and “no opinion expressed”.   It is ofcourse early days, and the straw poll is just an informal indication of the mood of the UN Security Council, but the strong showwing by the two womencandidates may be an indication that for the first time, the head of the UN can be a women. (click image to read more) ​

Popular

Editor's choice
Interview
Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Thursday Interview: Murad Muradov

Today, commonspace.eu starts a new regular weekly series. THURSDAY INTERVIEW, conducted by Lauri Nikulainen, will host  persons who are thinkers, opinion shapers, and implementors in their countries and spheres. We start the series with an interview with Murad Muradov, a leading person in Azerbaijan's think tank community. He is also the first co-chair of the Action Committee for a new Armenian-Azerbaijani Dialogue. Last September he made history by being the first Azerbaijani civil society activist to visit Armenia after the 44 day war, and the start of the peace process. Speaking about this visit Murad Muradov said: "My experience was largely positive. My negative expectations luckily didn’t play out. The discussions were respectful, the panel format bringing together experts from Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey was particularly valuable during the NATO Rose-Roth Seminar in Yerevan, and media coverage, while varied in tone, remained largely constructive. Some media outlets though attempted to represent me as more of a government mouthpiece than an independent expert, which was totally misleading.  Overall, I see these initiatives as important steps in rebuilding trust and normalising professional engagement. The fact that soon a larger Azerbaijani civil society visits to Armenia followed, reinforces the sense that this process is moving in the right direction." (click the image to read the interview in full)